| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Field init shorthand allows writing initializers like `tcx: tcx` as
`tcx`. The compiler already uses it extensively. Fix the last few places
where it isn't yet used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implements the ACP https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/393.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PinCoerceUnsized trait into core
cc ``@Darksonn`` ``@wedsonaf`` ``@ojeda``
This is a PR to introduce a `PinCoerceUnsized` trait in order to make trait impls generated by the proc-macro `#[derive(SmartPointer)]`, proposed by [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/e17e19ac7ad1c8ccad55d4babfaee1aa107d1da5/text/3621-derive-smart-pointer.md#pincoerceunsized-1), sound. There you may find explanation, justification and discussion about the alternatives.
Note that we do not seek stabilization of this `PinCoerceUnsized` trait in the near future. The stabilisation of this trait does not block the eventual stabilization process of the `#[derive(SmartPointer)]` macro. Ideally, use of `DerefPure` is more preferrable except this will actually constitute a breaking change. `PinCoerceUnsized` emerges as a solution to the said soundness hole while avoiding the breaking change. More details on the `DerefPure` option have been described in this [section](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/e17e19ac7ad1c8ccad55d4babfaee1aa107d1da5/text/3621-derive-smart-pointer.md#derefpure) of the RFC linked above.
Earlier discussion can be found in this [Zulip stream](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/136281-t-opsem/topic/Pin.20and.20soundness.20of.20unsizing.20coercions) and [rust-for-linux thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/425075-rust-for-linux/topic/.23.5Bderive.28SmartPointer.29.5D.20and.20pin.20unsoundness.20rfc.233621).
try-job: dist-various-2
|
|
|
|
After things that are immediately followed by a `use` declaration and
look like they might apply to that `use` item but actually don't.
|
|
The previous commit updated `rustfmt.toml` appropriately. This commit is
the outcome of running `x fmt --all` with the new formatting options.
|
|
Many tiny changes to stdlib doc comments to make them consistent (for example
"Returns foo", rather than "Return foo", per RFC1574), adding missing periods, paragraph
breaks, backticks for monospace style, and other minor nits.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1574-more-api-documentation-conventions.md#appendix-a-full-conventions-text
|
|
|
|
As discovered by Mara in #110897, our TLS implementation is a total mess. In the past months, I have simplified the actual macros and their expansions, but the majority of the complexity comes from the platform-specific support code needed to create keys and register destructors. In keeping with #117276, I have therefore moved all of the `thread_local_key`/`thread_local_dtor` modules to the `thread_local` module in `sys` and merged them into a new structure, so that future porters of `std` can simply mix-and-match the existing code instead of having to copy the same (bad) implementation everywhere. The new structure should become obvious when looking at `sys/thread_local/mod.rs`.
Unfortunately, the documentation changes associated with the refactoring have made this PR rather large. That said, this contains no functional changes except for two small ones:
* the key-based destructor fallback now, by virtue of sharing the implementation used by macOS and others, stores its list in a `#[thread_local]` static instead of in the key, eliminating one indirection layer and drastically simplifying its code.
* I've switched over ZKVM (tier 3) to use the same implementation as WebAssembly, as the implementation was just a way worse version of that
Please let me know if I can make this easier to review! I know these large PRs aren't optimal, but I couldn't think of any good intermediate steps.
@rustbot label +A-thread-locals
|
|
r=jethrogb
Fix `mut` static task queue in SGX target
[PR 125046](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125046) prevents mutable references to statics with `#[linkage]`. Such a construct was used with the tests for the `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` target. This PR fixes this and cleans up code a bit in 5 steps. Each step passes CI:
- The `mut` static is removed, and `Task` explicitly implements `Send`
- Renaming of the `task_queue::lock` function
- Pass function for `Thread` as `Send` to `Thread::imp` and update when `Packet<'scope, T>` implements `Sync`
- Storing `Task::p` as a type that implements `Send`
- Letting the compiler auto implement `Send` for `Task`
cc: ``@jethrogb``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allow calling these functions without `unsafe` blocks in editions up
until 2021, but don't trigger the `unused_unsafe` lint for `unsafe`
blocks containing these functions.
Fixes #27970.
Fixes #90308.
CC #124866.
|
|
|
|
Use queue-based `RwLock` on more platforms
This switches over Windows 7, SGX and Xous to the queue-based `RwLock` implementation added in #110211, thereby fixing #121949 for Windows 7 and partially resolving #114581 on SGX. TEEOS can't currently be switched because it doesn't have a good thread parking implementation.
CC `@roblabla` `@raoulstrackx` `@xobs` Could you help me test this, please?
r? `@ChrisDenton` the Windows stuff should be familiar to you
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts #121666 due to #123495
|
|
|
|
The dead_code lint was previously eroneously missing this dead code.
Since this lint bug has been fixed, the unused field need
to be removed or marked as `#[allow(dead_code)]`.
These structures API is common to all platforms so the code cannot be
removed and is hence marked allow(dead_code).
|
|
Use the OS thread name by default if `THREAD_INFO` has not been initialized
Currently if `THREAD_INFO` hasn't been initialized then the name will be set to `None`. This PR changes it to use the OS thread name by default. This mostly affects foreign threads at the moment but we could expand this to make more use of the OS thread name in the future.
Note: I've only implemented `Thread::get_name` for windows, linux and macos (and macos adjacent) targets. The rest just return `None`.
|
|
|
|
Delete architecture-specific memchr code in std::sys
Currently all architecture-specific memchr code is only used in `std::io`. Most of the actual `memchr` capacity exposed to the user through the slice API is instead implemented in `core::slice::memchr`.
Hence this commit deletes `memchr` from `std::sys[_common]` and replace calls to it by calls to `core::slice::memchr` functions. This deletes `(r)memchr` from the list of symbols linked to libc.
The interest of putting architecture specific code back in core is linked to the discussion to be had in #113654
|
|
Fix sgx unit test compilation
Fixes a compilation error:
```
error[E0583]: file not found for module `tests`
--> library/std/src/sys/locks/rwlock/sgx.rs:2:1
|
2 | mod tests;
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: to create the module `tests`, create file "library/std/src/sys/locks/rwlock/sgx/tests.rs" or "library/std/src/sys/locks/rwlock/sgx/tests/mod.rs"
= note: if there is a `mod tests` elsewhere in the crate already, import it with `use crate::...` instead
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0583`.
error: could not compile `std` (lib test) due to 1 previous error`
```
When running command:
```
`TF_BUILD=True RUST_TEST_THREADS=1 ./x.py test --stage 1 "library/std" tests/assembly tests/run-make --target=x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx --no-doc --exclude src/tools/linkchecker --exclude src/tools/rust-demangler --no-fail-fast 2>&1
```
The fix is done by moving a file to the location suggested by the compiler.
The issue was introduced by PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121177
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently all architecture-specific memchr code is only used in
`std::io`. Most of the actual `memchr` capacity exposed to the user
through the slice API is instead implemented in core::slice::memchr.
Hence this commit deletes memchr from std::sys[_common] and replace
calls to it by calls to core::slice::memchr functions. This deletes
(r)memchr from the list of symbols linked to libc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
