| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
Allow calling these functions without `unsafe` blocks in editions up
until 2021, but don't trigger the `unused_unsafe` lint for `unsafe`
blocks containing these functions.
Fixes #27970.
Fixes #90308.
CC #124866.
|
|
|
|
Use queue-based `RwLock` on more platforms
This switches over Windows 7, SGX and Xous to the queue-based `RwLock` implementation added in #110211, thereby fixing #121949 for Windows 7 and partially resolving #114581 on SGX. TEEOS can't currently be switched because it doesn't have a good thread parking implementation.
CC `@roblabla` `@raoulstrackx` `@xobs` Could you help me test this, please?
r? `@ChrisDenton` the Windows stuff should be familiar to you
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts #121666 due to #123495
|
|
|
|
The dead_code lint was previously eroneously missing this dead code.
Since this lint bug has been fixed, the unused field need
to be removed or marked as `#[allow(dead_code)]`.
These structures API is common to all platforms so the code cannot be
removed and is hence marked allow(dead_code).
|
|
Use the OS thread name by default if `THREAD_INFO` has not been initialized
Currently if `THREAD_INFO` hasn't been initialized then the name will be set to `None`. This PR changes it to use the OS thread name by default. This mostly affects foreign threads at the moment but we could expand this to make more use of the OS thread name in the future.
Note: I've only implemented `Thread::get_name` for windows, linux and macos (and macos adjacent) targets. The rest just return `None`.
|
|
|
|
Delete architecture-specific memchr code in std::sys
Currently all architecture-specific memchr code is only used in `std::io`. Most of the actual `memchr` capacity exposed to the user through the slice API is instead implemented in `core::slice::memchr`.
Hence this commit deletes `memchr` from `std::sys[_common]` and replace calls to it by calls to `core::slice::memchr` functions. This deletes `(r)memchr` from the list of symbols linked to libc.
The interest of putting architecture specific code back in core is linked to the discussion to be had in #113654
|
|
Fix sgx unit test compilation
Fixes a compilation error:
```
error[E0583]: file not found for module `tests`
--> library/std/src/sys/locks/rwlock/sgx.rs:2:1
|
2 | mod tests;
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: to create the module `tests`, create file "library/std/src/sys/locks/rwlock/sgx/tests.rs" or "library/std/src/sys/locks/rwlock/sgx/tests/mod.rs"
= note: if there is a `mod tests` elsewhere in the crate already, import it with `use crate::...` instead
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0583`.
error: could not compile `std` (lib test) due to 1 previous error`
```
When running command:
```
`TF_BUILD=True RUST_TEST_THREADS=1 ./x.py test --stage 1 "library/std" tests/assembly tests/run-make --target=x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx --no-doc --exclude src/tools/linkchecker --exclude src/tools/rust-demangler --no-fail-fast 2>&1
```
The fix is done by moving a file to the location suggested by the compiler.
The issue was introduced by PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121177
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently all architecture-specific memchr code is only used in
`std::io`. Most of the actual `memchr` capacity exposed to the user
through the slice API is instead implemented in core::slice::memchr.
Hence this commit deletes memchr from std::sys[_common] and replace
calls to it by calls to core::slice::memchr functions. This deletes
(r)memchr from the list of symbols linked to libc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|