| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Prevent double reference in generic futex
In the Windows futex implementation we were a little lax at allowing references to references (i.e. `&&`) which can lead to deadlocks due to reading the wrong memory address. This uses a trait to tighten the constraints and ensure this doesn't happen.
r? libs
|
|
Make more Windows functions `#![deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]`
As part of #127747, I've evaluated some more Windows functions and added `unsafe` blocks where necessary. Some are just trivial wrappers that "inherit" the full unsafety of their function, but for others I've added some safety comments. A few functions weren't actually unsafe at all. I think they were just using `unsafe fn` to avoid an `unsafe {}` block.
I'm not touching `c.rs` yet because that is partially being addressed by another PR and also I have plans to further reduce the number of wrapper functions we have in there.
r? libs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These need to get their safety story straight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make os/windows and pal/windows default to `#![deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]`
This is to prevent regressions in modules that currently pass. I did also fix up a few trivial places where the module contained only one or two simple wrappers. In more complex cases we should try to ensure the `unsafe` blocks are appropriately scoped and have any appropriate safety comments.
This does not fix the windows bits of #127747 but it should help prevent regressions until that is done and also make it more obvious specifically which modules need attention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As with USHORT, keep using C types for BSD socket APIs.
|
|
We stick to C types in for socket and address as these are at least nominally BSD-ish and they're used outside of pal/windows in general *nix code
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows: Add experimental support for linking std-required system DLLs using raw-dylib
For Windows, this allows std to define system imports without needing the user to have import libraries. It's intended for this to become the default.
For now it's an experimental feature so it can be tested using build-std.
|
|
|
|
control how a new process should display its window (normal, minimized, maximized, etc)
|
|
For Windows, this allows defining imports without needing the user to have import libraries. It's intended for this to become the default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove `MaybeUninit::uninit_array()` and replace it with inline const blocks.
\[This PR originally contained the changes in #125995 too. See edit history for the original PR description.]
The documentation of `MaybeUninit::uninit_array()` says:
> Note: in a future Rust version this method may become unnecessary when Rust allows [inline const expressions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76001). The example below could then use `let mut buf = [const { MaybeUninit::<u8>::uninit() }; 32];`.
The PR adding it also said: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65580#issuecomment-544200681>
> if it’s stabilized soon enough maybe it’s not worth having a standard library method that will be replaceable with `let buffer = [MaybeUninit::<T>::uninit(); $N];`
That time has come to pass — inline const expressions are stable — so `MaybeUninit::uninit_array()` is now unnecessary. The only remaining question is whether it is an important enough *convenience* to keep it around.
I believe it is net good to remove this function, on the principle that it is better to compose two orthogonal features (`MaybeUninit` and array construction) than to have a specific function for the specific combination, now that that is possible.
|
|
This is possible now that inline const blocks are stable; the idea was
even mentioned as an alternative when `uninit_array()` was added:
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65580#issuecomment-544200681>
> if it’s stabilized soon enough maybe it’s not worth having a
> standard library method that will be replaceable with
> `let buffer = [MaybeUninit::<T>::uninit(); $N];`
Const array repetition and inline const blocks are now stable (in the
next release), so that circumstance has come to pass, and we no longer
have reason to want `uninit_array()` other than convenience. Therefore,
let’s evaluate the inconvenience by not using `uninit_array()` in
the standard library, before potentially deleting it entirely.
|
|
std: refactor the TLS implementation
As discovered by Mara in #110897, our TLS implementation is a total mess. In the past months, I have simplified the actual macros and their expansions, but the majority of the complexity comes from the platform-specific support code needed to create keys and register destructors. In keeping with #117276, I have therefore moved all of the `thread_local_key`/`thread_local_dtor` modules to the `thread_local` module in `sys` and merged them into a new structure, so that future porters of `std` can simply mix-and-match the existing code instead of having to copy the same (bad) implementation everywhere. The new structure should become obvious when looking at `sys/thread_local/mod.rs`.
Unfortunately, the documentation changes associated with the refactoring have made this PR rather large. That said, this contains no functional changes except for two small ones:
* the key-based destructor fallback now, by virtue of sharing the implementation used by macOS and others, stores its list in a `#[thread_local]` static instead of in the key, eliminating one indirection layer and drastically simplifying its code.
* I've switched over ZKVM (tier 3) to use the same implementation as WebAssembly, as the implementation was just a way worse version of that
Please let me know if I can make this easier to review! I know these large PRs aren't optimal, but I couldn't think of any good intermediate steps.
`@rustbot` label +A-thread-locals
|
|
Rename `std::fs::try_exists` to `std::fs::exists` and stabilize fs_try_exists
FCP completed in tracking issue.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83186
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83186
Stabilized API:
```rust
mod fs {
pub fn exists<P: AsRef<Path>>(path: P) -> io::Result<bool>;
}
```
|
|
Bump windows-bindgen to 0.57
This PR updates our generated Windows API bindings using the latest version of `windows-bindgen`.
The only change to the generated code is that `derive` is used for `Copy` and `Clone` instead of `impl`.
|
|
As discovered by Mara in #110897, our TLS implementation is a total mess. In the past months, I have simplified the actual macros and their expansions, but the majority of the complexity comes from the platform-specific support code needed to create keys and register destructors. In keeping with #117276, I have therefore moved all of the `thread_local_key`/`thread_local_dtor` modules to the `thread_local` module in `sys` and merged them into a new structure, so that future porters of `std` can simply mix-and-match the existing code instead of having to copy the same (bad) implementation everywhere. The new structure should become obvious when looking at `sys/thread_local/mod.rs`.
Unfortunately, the documentation changes associated with the refactoring have made this PR rather large. That said, this contains no functional changes except for two small ones:
* the key-based destructor fallback now, by virtue of sharing the implementation used by macOS and others, stores its list in a `#[thread_local]` static instead of in the key, eliminating one indirection layer and drastically simplifying its code.
* I've switched over ZKVM (tier 3) to use the same implementation as WebAssembly, as the implementation was just a way worse version of that
Please let me know if I can make this easier to review! I know these large PRs aren't optimal, but I couldn't think of any good intermediate steps.
@rustbot label +A-thread-locals
|
|
PR #125443 will reformat all the use declarations in the repo. This
would break a patch kept in `rustc_codegen_cranelift` that gets applied
to `library/std/src/sys/pal/windows/rand.rs`.
So this commit formats the use declarations in
`library/std/src/sys/pal/windows/rand.rs` in advance of #125443 and
updates the patch file accordingly.
The motivation is that #125443 is a huge change and we want to get
fiddly little changes like this out of the way so it can be nothing more
than an `x fmt --all`.
|
|
|
|
|
