| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Improve Debug implementations of Mutex and RwLock.
This improves the Debug implementations of Mutex and RwLock.
They now show the poison flag and use debug_non_exhaustive. (See #67364.)
|
|
Derive Debug for io::Chain instead of manually implementing it.
This derives Debug for io::Chain instead of manually implementing it.
The manual implementation has the same bounds, so I don't think there's any reason for a manual implementation. The names used in the derive implementation are even nicer (`first`/`second`) than the manual implementation (`t`/`u`), and include the `done_first` field too.
|
|
Fix Debug implementation for RwLock{Read,Write}Guard.
This would attempt to print the Debug representation of the lock that the guard has locked, which will try to lock again, fail, and just print `"<locked>"` unhelpfully.
After this change, this just prints the contents of the mutex, like the other smart pointers (and MutexGuard) do.
MutexGuard had this problem too: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57702
|
|
Use DebugStruct::finish_non_exhaustive() in std.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67364
|
|
lazily calls some fns
Replaced some fn's with it's lazy variants.
|
|
ExitStatus: print "exit status: {}" rather than "exit code: {}" on unix
Proper Unix terminology is "exit status" (vs "wait status"). "exit
code" is imprecise on Unix and therefore unclear. (As far as I can
tell, "exit code" is correct terminology on Windows.)
This new wording is unfortunately inconsistent with the identifier
names in the Rust stdlib.
It is the identifier names that are wrong, as discussed at length in eg
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/process/struct.ExitStatus.html
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/os/unix/process/trait.ExitStatusExt.html
Unfortunately for API stability reasons it would be a lot of work, and
a lot of disruption, to change the names in the stdlib (eg to rename
`std::process::ExitStatus` to `std::process::ChildStatus` or
something), but we should fix the message output. Many (probably
most) readers of these messages about exit statuses will be users and
system administrators, not programmers, who won't even know that Rust
has this wrong terminology.
So I think the right thing is to fix the documentation (as I have
already done) and, now, the terminology in the implementation.
This is a user-visible change to the behaviour of all Rust programs
which run Unix subprocesses. Hopefully no-one is matching against the
exit status string, except perhaps in tests.
|
|
Use detailed and shorter fs error explaination
Includes suggestion from `@the8472` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79390#issuecomment-733263336
|
|
Generalize and inline slice::fill specializations
This makes the memset specialization applicable to more types. And since the code now lives in a generic method it is also eligible for cross-crate inlining which should fix #83235
|
|
Includes suggestion from the8472 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79390#issuecomment-733263336
More detail error explanation in fs doc
|
|
They now show the poison flag and use debug_non_exhaustive.
|
|
The manual implementation has the same bounds, so I don't think there's
any reason for a manual implementation. The names used in the derive
implementation are even nicer (`first`/`second`) than the manual
implementation (`t`/`u`), and include the `done_first` field too.
|
|
This would attempt to print the Debug representation of the lock that
the guard has locked, which will try to lock again, fail, and just print
"<locked>" unhelpfully.
After this change, this just prints the contents of the mutex, like the
other smart pointers (and MutexGuard) do.
|
|
|
|
Add IEEE 754 compliant fmt/parse of -0, infinity, NaN
This pull request improves the Rust float formatting/parsing libraries to comply with IEEE 754's formatting expectations around certain special values, namely signed zero, the infinities, and NaN. It also adds IEEE 754 compliance tests that, while less stringent in certain places than many of the existing flt2dec/dec2flt capability tests, are intended to serve as the beginning of a roadmap to future compliance with the standard. Some relevant documentation is also adjusted with clarifying remarks.
This PR follows from discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/1074, and closes #24623.
The most controversial change here is likely to be that -0 is now printed as -0. Allow me to explain: While there appears to be community support for an opt-in toggle of printing floats as if they exist in the naively expected domain of numbers, i.e. not the extended reals (where floats live), IEEE 754-2019 is clear that a float converted to a string should be capable of being transformed into the original floating point bit-pattern when it satisfies certain conditions (namely, when it is an actual numeric value i.e. not a NaN and the original and destination float width are the same). -0 is given special attention here as a value that should have its sign preserved. In addition, the vast majority of other programming languages not only output `-0` but output `-0.0` here.
While IEEE 754 offers a broad leeway in how to handle producing what it calls a "decimal character sequence", it is clear that the operations a language provides should be capable of round tripping, and it is confusing to advertise the f32 and f64 types as binary32 and binary64 yet have the most basic way of producing a string and then reading it back into a floating point number be non-conformant with the standard. Further, existing documentation suggested that e.g. -0 would be printed with -0 regardless of the presence of the `+` fmt character, but it prints "+0" instead if given such (which was what led to the opening of #24623).
There are other parsing and formatting issues for floating point numbers which prevent Rust from complying with the standard, as well as other well-documented challenges on the arithmetic level, but I hope that this can be the beginning of motion towards solving those challenges.
|
|
|
|
Document that the SocketAddr memory representation is not stable
Intended to help out with #78802. Work has been put into finding and fixing code that assumes the memory layout of `SocketAddrV4` and `SocketAddrV6`. But it turns out there are cases where new code continues to make the same assumption ([example](https://github.com/spacejam/seaslug/commit/96927dc2b7b918860a79c4eb6336051e52c6137a#diff-917db3d8ca6f862ebf42726b23c72a12b35e584e497ebdb24e474348d7c6ffb6R610-R621)).
The memory layout of a type in `std` is never part of the public API. Unless explicitly stated I guess. But since that is invalidly relied upon by a considerable amount of code for these particular types, it might make sense to explicitly document this. This can be temporary. Once #78802 lands it does not make sense to rely on the layout any longer, and this documentation can also be removed.
|
|
Make # pretty print format easier to discover
# Rationale:
I use (cargo cult?) three formats in rust: `{}`, debug `{:?}`, and pretty-print debug `{:#?}`. I discovered `{:#?}` in some blog post or guide when I started working in Rust. While `#` is documented I think it is hard to discover. So taking the good advice of ```@carols10cents``` I am trying to improve the docs with a PR
As a reminder "pretty print" means that where `{:?}` will print something like
```
foo: { b1: 1, b2: 2}
```
`{:#?}` will prints something like
```
foo {
b1: 1
b2: 3
}
```
# Changes
Add an example to `fmt` to try and make it easier to discover `#`
|
|
|
|
Fixes #83046
The program
fn main() {
println!("{:?}", '"');
println!("{:?}", "'");
}
would previously print
'\"'
"\'"
With this patch it now prints:
'"'
"'"
|
|
ExitStatusExt: Fix missing word in two docs messages
Looks like I missed the lack of these "and"s.
|
|
Add docs for Vec::from functions
Part of #51430
|
|
Update the minimum external LLVM to 10
r? `@nikic`
|
|
Looks like I missed the lack of these "and"s.
Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
|
|
Revert reverting of stabilizing integer::BITS.
Now that `lexical-core` has an updated version that won't break with this stabilization, let's try to stabilize this again.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81654#issuecomment-778564715
Tracking issue with FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76904
|
|
Proper Unix terminology is "exit status" (vs "wait status"). "exit
code" is imprecise on Unix and therefore unclear. (As far as I can
tell, "exit code" is correct terminology on Windows.)
This new wording is unfortunately inconsistent with the identifier
names in the Rust stdlib.
It is the identifier names that are wrong, as discussed at length in eg
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/process/struct.ExitStatus.html
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/os/unix/process/trait.ExitStatusExt.html
Unfortunately for API stability reasons it would be a lot of work, and
a lot of disruption, to change the names in the stdlib (eg to rename
`std::process::ExitStatus` to `std::process::ChildStatus` or
something), but we should fix the message output. Many (probably
most) readers of these messages about exit statuses will be users and
system administrators, not programmers, who won't even know that Rust
has this wrong terminology.
So I think the right thing is to fix the documentation (as I have
already done) and, now, the terminology in the implementation.
This is a user-visible change to the behaviour of all Rust programs
which run Unix subprocesses. Hopefully no-one is matching against the
exit status string, except perhaps in tests.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
|
|
|
|
Part of #51430
|
|
Use intra-doc link in core::cell
``@rustbot`` label T-doc A-intra-doc-links
r? ``@jyn514``
|
|
Add Result::into_err where the Ok variant is the never type
Equivalent of #66045 but for the inverse situation where `T: Into<!>` rather than `E: Into<!>`.
I'm using the same feature gate name. I can't see why one of these methods would be OK to stabilize but not the other.
Tracking issue: #61695
|
|
Remove Option::{unwrap_none, expect_none}.
This removes `Option::unwrap_none` and `Option::expect_none` since we're not going to stabilize them, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62633.
Closes #62633
|
|
stabilize debug_non_exhaustive
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67364
but it is still an open question whether the other `Debug*` struct's should have a similar method. I would guess that would best be put underneath a new feature gate, as this one seems uncontroversial enough to stabilize as is
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expose str::SplitInclusive in alloc and therefore in std
This seems to have been omitted from the beginning when this feature was first introduced in 86bf96291d82. Most users won't need to name this type which is probably why this wasn't noticed in the meantime.
See #83372 for a different but related bug.
### Notes for reviewers
I think I have got this right but TBH I am not very familiar with the relationship between core and std and so on. <strike>I also haven't don't any kind of test (not even a build) yet. I will do a local docs build to see that the type now appears in the std docs.</strike> I did a local docs build and it has made this type appear as `std::str::SplitInclusive` as expected
The linkification of the return value from `str::split_inclusive` teleports me to the online url for `core::str::SplitInclusive`. I think this may be a rustdoc anomaly (similar to #79630 maybe) but I am not sure. Perhaps it means I haven't done the `std` -> `core` referrence correctly.
I made this insta-stable since it seems like simply a bug. Please LMK if that is not right. *(edited to add:)* In particular, IDK how this ought to relate to the (?)current release process.
|
|
|
|
Add internal io::Error::new_const to avoid allocations.
This makes it possible to have a io::Error containing a message with zero allocations, and uses that everywhere to avoid the *three* allocations involved in `io::Error::new(kind, "message")`.
The function signature isn't perfect, because it needs a reference to the `&str`. So for now, this is just a `pub(crate)` function. Later, we'll be able to use `fn new_const<MSG: &'static str>(kind: ErrorKind)` to make that a bit better. (Then we'll also be able to use some ZST trickery if that would result in more efficient code.)
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83352
|
|
|
|
|
|
This seems to have been omitted from the beginning when this feature
was first introduced in 86bf96291d82.
Most users won't need to name this type which is probably why this
wasn't noticed in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
|
|
Add `debug-refcell` feature to libcore
See https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Attaching.20backtraces.20to.20RefCell/near/226273614
for some background discussion
This PR adds a new off-by-default feature `debug-refcell` to libcore.
When enabled, this feature stores additional debugging information in
`RefCell`. This information is included in the panic message when
`borrow()` or `borrow_mut()` panics, to make it easier to track down the
source of the issue.
Currently, we store the caller location for the earliest active borrow.
This has a number of advantages:
* There is only a constant amount of overhead per `RefCell`
* We don't need any heap memory, so it can easily be implemented in core
* Since we are storing the *earliest* active borrow, we don't need any
extra logic in the `Drop` implementation for `Ref` and `RefMut`
Limitations:
* We only store the caller location, not a full `Backtrace`. Until
we get support for `Backtrace` in libcore, this is the best tha we can
do.
* The captured location is only displayed when `borrow()` or
`borrow_mut()` panics. If a crate calls `try_borrow().unwrap()`
or `try_borrow_mut().unwrap()`, this extra information will be lost.
To make testing easier, I've enabled the `debug-refcell` feature by
default. I'm not sure how to write a test for this feature - we would
need to rebuild core from the test framework, and create a separate
sysroot.
Since this feature will be off-by-default, users will need to use
`xargo` or `cargo -Z build-std` to enable this feature. For users using
a prebuilt standard library, this feature will be disabled with zero
overhead.
I've created a simple test program:
```rust
use std::cell::RefCell;
fn main() {
let _ = std::panic::catch_unwind(|| {
let val = RefCell::new(true);
let _first = val.borrow();
let _second = val.borrow();
let _third = val.borrow_mut();
});
let _ = std::panic::catch_unwind(|| {
let val = RefCell::new(true);
let first = val.borrow_mut();
drop(first);
let _second = val.borrow_mut();
let _thid = val.borrow();
});
}
```
which produces the following output:
```
thread 'main' panicked at 'already borrowed: BorrowMutError at refcell_test.rs:6:26', refcell_test.rs:8:26
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
thread 'main' panicked at 'already mutably borrowed: BorrowError at refcell_test.rs:16:27', refcell_test.rs:18:25
```
|
|
|
|
"semantic equivalence" is too strong a phrasing here, which is why
actually explaining what kind of circumstances might produce a -0
was chosen instead.
|
|
This commit removes the previous mechanism of differentiating
between "Debug" and "Display" formattings for the sign of -0 so as
to comply with the IEEE 754 standard's requirements on external
character sequences preserving various attributes of a floating
point representation.
In addition, numerous tests are fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilize or_patterns (RFC 2535, 2530, 2175)
closes #54883
This PR stabilizes the or_patterns feature in Rust 1.53.
This is blocked on the following (in order):
- [x] The crater run in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78935#issuecomment-731564021
- [x] The resolution of the unresolved questions and a second crater run (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78935#issuecomment-735412705)
- It looks like we will need to pursue some sort of edition-based transition for `:pat`.
- [x] Nomination and discussion by T-lang
- [x] Implement new behavior for `:pat` based on consensus (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80100).
- [ ] An FCP on stabilization
EDIT: Stabilization report is in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79278#issuecomment-772815177
|
