| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
|
|
By default, `x check` doesn't compile the rust-analyzer. But when it's enabled in the config's
tools section, there's no reason not to do it. This change allows `x check` to compile rust-analyzer
if it's enabled in config's tools section.
Signed-off-by: ozkanonur <work@onurozkan.dev>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and document why the single remaining place can't switch
|
|
This fixes the panic from the previous commit.
|
|
This is useful for profiling metadata generation.
This comes very close to removing all_krates, but doesn't quite -
there's one last usage left in `doc`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were a series of unfortunate interactions here. Here's an MCVE of the test this fixes (committed as `tests/ui/meta/no_std-extern-libc.rs`):
```rust
#![crate_type = "lib"]
#![no_std]
#![feature(rustc_private)]
extern crate libc;
```
Before, this would give an error about duplicate versions of libc:
```
error[E0464]: multiple candidates for `rlib` dependency `libc` found
--> fake-test-src-base/allocator/no_std-alloc-error-handler-default.rs:15:1
|
LL | extern crate libc;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: candidate #1: /home/gh-jyn514/rust/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/liblibc-358db1024b7d9957.rlib
= note: candidate #2: /home/gh-jyn514/rust/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/lib/rustlib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/liblibc-ebc478710122a279.rmeta
```
Both these versions were downloaded from CI, but one came from the `rust-std` component and one came from `rustc-dev`:
```
; tar -tf build/cache/f2d9a3d0771504f1ae776226a5799dcb4408a91a/rust-std-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz | grep liblibc
rust-std-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/rust-std-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/liblibc-68a2d9e195dd6ed2.rlib
; tar -tf build/cache/f2d9a3d0771504f1ae776226a5799dcb4408a91a/rustc-dev-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz | grep liblibc
rustc-dev-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/rustc-dev/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/liblibc-f226c9fbdd92a0fd.rmeta
```
The fix was to only copy files from `rust-std` unless a Step explicitly requests for the `rustc-dev` components to be available by calling `builder.ensure(compile::Rustc)`.
To avoid having to re-parse the `rustc-dev.tar.xz` tarball every time, which is quite slow, this adds a new `build/host/ci-rustc/.rustc-dev-contents` cache file which stores only the names of files we need to copy into the sysroot.
This also allows reverting the hack in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110121; now that we only copy
rustc-dev on-demand, we can correctly add the `Rustc` check artifacts
into the sysroot, so that this works correctly even when
`download-rustc` is forced to `true`.
---
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108767#issuecomment-1501217657 for why `no_std` is required for the MCVE test to fail; it's complicated and not particularly important.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108767.
|
|
Fix x check --stage 1 when download-ci-llvm=false
Bootstrap tries to avoid building LLVM unless it needs to; in particular we only build it for `x build`, not `x check`. Unfortunately, the check forgot about existence of stages - it would break if you used `x check --stage 1`:
```
= note: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lPolly: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lPollyISL: No such file or directory
```
Fix it to work for stage 1.
I recommend reading this commit-by-commit; the first one makes a bunch of whitespace changes but otherwise doesn't change the logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass arguments to `x` subcommands with `--`
Fixes #107375
Any arguments passed to `x` following `--` are removed and not parsed, instead passed down to subcommands (just the ones listed in the issue, not sure if more are needed). This does not remove the existing `--args` and `--test-args` behaviour, just extends it. It's also not documented in the help, not sure of the best way to format it.
r? `@jyn514`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update mdbook
This updates mdbook from 0.4.21 to 0.4.25. The list of changes is [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/mdBook/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#mdbook-0425). The only user-visible changes are some changes around the theme picker, and change to the copy-to-clipboard ignoring hidden lines.
Internally there were some dependency updates and small fixes.
This also updates `clap` from 4.0.15 to 4.0.32 whose changelog is [here](https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#4032---2022-12-22). This impacts tools like cargo. I don't see anything particularly noteworthy there, though there are some small user-visible changes.
Unfortunately this required adding a hack for building `rustix` with a bootstrap tool. The comment explains why. I am unable to think of some other workaround (or even a cleaner way to set the rustflag). Ideas are welcome if you can think of alternatives. I'm struggling to even think of a long-term solution, other than asking projects not to do auto-nightly feature detection.
One medium-term solution is to avoid the clap dependency for the mdbook library (which is how rustix gets pulled in). That is one of my goals for the 0.5 release of mdbook, but that probably won't happen until later this year. It would also require dropping clap from `rustbook` and using some other means to parse arguments (there's only two options, so it can probably be done manually).
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 9dfe50440e6d48bd2fd40a4b7b3992998e55eace.
Fixes `x clippy`.
|
|
The actual object code should be linked from librustc_driver.so,
which is still included in rustc-dev. This saves on download time and
disk usage.
|
|
|
|
Before:
```
Testing ["rustc_interface"] stage0 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu -> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu)
```
After:
```
Testing {rustc_interface} stage0 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu -> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu)
```
Note there is a slight consistency between `build` and `test`: The
former doesn't print "compiler artifacts". It would be annoying to fix
and doesn't hurt anything, so I left it be.
```
; x t rustc_interface --stage 0 --dry-run
Testing {rustc_interface} stage0 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu -> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu)
; x b rustc_interface --stage 0 --dry-run
Building {rustc_interface} stage0 compiler artifacts (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu -> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu)
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
only run --all-targets in stage0 for Std
Repro'd the issue with `python3 x.py check --stage 1 library/std` and tested the fix with the same command.
r? `@jyn514`
I tried to implement [this solution](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98720#issuecomment-1184435462), but didn't have any luck. I don't think I fully understood what needed to be done. However, I would love to be mentored on it since it would be a more correct solution, and I can learn more about how bootstrap works.
|
|
|
|
- use `path` instead of `paths`
- don't mark rust-analyzer as an optional tool
- print the cargo command that's run in the proc-macro-test build script
this originally was part of a change to fix `test --stage 0 rust-analyzer`,
but I'm going to leave that for a separate PR so it's easier to review.
|
|
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <github@jyn.dev>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support `-A`, `-W`, `-D` and `-F` when running `./x.py clippy`
Resolves #97059
This PR adds support for `-A`, `-W`, `-D` and `-F` when running `./x.py clippy`.
|
|
|
|
- Add `Interned<Vec<String>>` and use it for tail args
- Refactor `cache.rs` not to need a separate impl for each internable type
|
|
Add `x {check,build,doc} {compiler,library}` aliases.
While working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95503, I realized that it will interfere with existing command lines:
Currently people run `x build library/std` expecting it to "add all library crates to the sysroot",
but after that change, it will *only* build `libstd` and its dependencies (and add them to the sysroot), not libtest or libproc_macro.
That will work for local testing in most cases, but could be confusing. Even if not, though, I think `x build library` is more clear about what actually happens than the current `x build library/std`.
The intended end goal is something like:
- For check/build/doc, we have library + compiler aliases, which correspond to basically "most possible" for that piece. This is the intended path of entry (rather than library/test or similar as today) for when you just want the thing to work -- for example, getting a compiler that is "crates.io-compatible" would be roughly `x.py build library`). #95504
- Specific crate invocations build up to that crate, which means that if you don't care about tests you probably want x.py build library/proc_macro or library/std for faster build times. #95503
Note that this is already implemented today for the `doc` command and seems to work pretty well in practice.
I plan to change the dev-guide and various instructions in the README to `build library` once this is merged.
`@rustbot` label +A-rustbuild
|
|
Bootstrap already allows selecting these in `PathSet::has`, which allows
any string that matches the end of a full path.
I found these by adding `assert!(path.exists())` in `StepDescription::paths`.
I think ideally we wouldn't have any aliases that aren't paths, but I've held
off on enforcing that here since it may be controversial, I'll open a separate PR.
|
|
While working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95503,
I realized that this will interfere with existing command lines:
Currently people run `x build library/std` expecting it to be added to the sysroot,
but after that change, it will *only* build `libstd` without making it available
for the toolchain.
It's debatable whether that's a breaking change that will be accepted; if so, this PR is absolutely
necessary to make sure there's a command for "build the standard library and add it to the sysroot".
Even if not, though, I think `x build library` is more clear about what actually happens than the
current `x build library/std`.
For consistency, also add support for `compiler` and all other command variants. Note that `doc
compiler` was already supported, so in a sense this is just fixing an existing inconsistency.
I plan to change the dev-guide and various instructions in the README to `build library` once this is merged.
|
|
Libgccjit codegen
This PR introduces a subtree for a gcc-based codegen backend to the repository, per decision in https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/442. We do not yet expect to ship this backend on nightly or run tests in CI, but we do verify that the backend checks (i.e., `cargo check`) successfully.
Work is expected to progress primarily in https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_gcc, with semi-regular upstreaming, like with other subtrees.
|
|
These were left over in migrations to subtrees, which should generally be treated
as-if it was local.
Also fixes a warning caused by this change.
|
|
this caused a lot of noise because benchmarks and tests were also checked
|
|
Now that Cargo deduplicates diagnostics from different targets, this doesn't flood the console with
duplicate errors.
Note that this doesn't add `--all-targets` in `Builder::cargo` directly because `impl Step for Std`
actually wants to omit `--all-targets` the first time while it's still building libtest.
When passed `--all-targets`, this warns that the option isn't needed, but still continues to compile.
|