| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
This commit deletes the `alloc_system` crate from the standard
distribution. This unstable crate is no longer needed in the modern
stable global allocator world, but rather its functionality is folded
directly into the standard library. The standard library was already the
only stable location to access this crate, and as a result this should
not affect any stable code.
|
|
Remove the `alloc_jemalloc` crate
This commit removes the `alloc_jemalloc` crate from the standard library and all related configuration. We will no longer be shipping this unstable crate. Rationale for this is provided on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36963 and the many linked issues, but I can inline rationale here if desired!
We currently rely on jemalloc for increased perf in the Rust compiler, however. [This perf run shows](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=74ff7dcb1388e60a613cd6050bcd372a3cc4998b&end=7e7928dc0340d79b404e93f0c79eb4b946c1d669&stat=wall-time) that if we switch to glibc 2.23's allocator that it's slower than jemalloc across many benchmarks. [This perf run, however](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=22cc2ae8057d14e980b7c784e1eb2eee26b59e7d&end=10c95ccfa7a7adc12f4e608621ca29f9b98eed29), shows that if we use `jemalloc-sys` from crates.io then rustc actually gets faster across all benchmarks! (presumably because it has a more recent version of jemalloc than our submodule).
As a result, it's expected that this doesn't regress any code (as it's just removing an unstable crate) and it should actually improve rustc performance because it updates jemalloc.
Closes #36963
|
|
Bump cargo-vendor version
Currently we pin `cargo-vendor` to 0.1.4, which doesn't set the `User-Agent` HTTP header. crates.io is going to require that header in the near future, so this PR bumps the pinned version of the crate to the latest one (which correctly sets the header).
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
cc @sgrif
|
|
This commit removes all jemalloc related submodules, configuration, etc,
from the bootstrap, from the standard library, and from the compiler.
This will be followed up with a change to use jemalloc specifically as
part of rustc on blessed platforms.
|
|
r=Mark-Simulacrum
Add libproc_macro to rust-src distribution
Fixes #55279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to to updating Cargo's submodule and Cargo's dependencies,
this also updates Cargo's build to build OpenSSL statically into Cargo
as well as libcurl unconditionally. This removes OpenSSL build logic
from the bootstrap code, and otherwise requests that even on OSX we
build curl statically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We're shipping a rust-enabled lldb, but the "lldb" executable is not
installed into the "bin" directory by rustup. See the discussion in
https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rustup.rs/pull/1492 for
background on this decision. There, we agreed to have rust-lldb
prefer the rust-enabled lldb if it is installed.
This patch changes dist.rs to put lldb into rustlib, following what
was done for the other LLVM tools in #53955, and then fixes rust-lldb
to prefer that lldb, if it exists.
See issue #48168
|
|
Previously we just weren't shipping this at all as we were only looking for the
Linux version!
|
|
This commit tweaks the layout of a few components that we distribute to
hopefully fix across all platforms the recent issues with LLD being unable to
find the LLVM shared object. In #53245 we switched to building LLVM as a dynamic
library, which means that LLVM tools by default link to LLVM dynamically rather
than statically. This in turn means that the tools, at runtime, need to find the
LLVM shared library.
LLVM's shared library is currently distributed as part of the rustc component.
This library is located, however, at `$sysroot/lib`. The LLVM tools we ship are
in two locations:
* LLD is shipped at `$sysroot/lib/rustlib/$host/bin/rust-lld`
* Other LLVM tools are shipped at `$sysroot/bin`
Each LLVM tool has an embedded rpath directive indicating where it will search
for dynamic libraries. This currently points to `../lib` and is presumably
inserted by LLVM's build system. Unfortunately, though, this directive is only
correct for the LLVM tools at `$sysroot/bin`, not LLD!
This commit is targeted at fixing this situation by making two changes:
* LLVM tools other than LLD are moved in the distribution to
`$sysroot/lib/rustlib/$host/bin`. This moves them next to LLD and should
position them for...
* The LLVM shared object is moved to `$sysroot/lib/rustlib/$host/lib`
Together this means that all tools should natively be able to find the shared
object and the shared object should be installed all the time for the various
tools. Overall this should...
Closes #53813
|
|
A recent change (#53245) started to build LLVM with ThinLTO enabled and to
ensure that compile times are kept down it builds LLVM dynamically by default to
ensure that all the various LLVM tools aren't redoing all that optimization
work. This means, however, that all LLVM tools depend on LLVM's dynamic library
by default.
While the LLVM tools and LLDB components were updated to include the shared
library we accidentally forgot about LLD, included with the main rustc
component. LLD also links dynamically to LLVM and ships a non-working binary
right now because of this!
This commit updates our distribution to ship the LLVM dynamic library with the
compiler libraries. While not technically needed for rustc itself to operate
(right now) it may be needed for LLD, and otherwise it serves as a good basis
for the other LLVM tools components to work with as well.
This should...
Closes #53813
|
|
|
|
This optionally adds lldb (and clang, which it needs) to the build.
Because rust uses LLVM 7, and because clang 7 is not yet released, a
recent git master version of clang is used.
The lldb that is used includes the Rust plugin.
lldb is only built when asked for, or when doing a nightly build on
macOS. Only macOS is done for now due to difficulties with the Python
dependency.
|
|
Its former contents are now in libcore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes: #52102
|
|
Inject clippy into the rls again
Also makes sure we actually point to the local rustfmt
r? @nrc
cc @Manishearth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update crates in `Cargo.lock`
This is a "hopefully routine" update of our crates.io-based crates in
`Cargo.lock`, and let's see how it fares on CI...
|
|
rename rustc's lld to rust-lld
to not shadow the system installed LLD when linking with LLD.
Before:
- `-C linker=lld -Z linker-flavor=ld.lld` uses rustc's LLD
- It's not possible to use a system installed LLD that's named `lld`
With this commit:
- `-C linker=rust-lld -Z linker-flavor=ld.lld` uses rustc's LLD
- `-C linker=lld -Z linker-flavor=ld.lld` uses the system installed LLD
we don't offer guarantees about the availability of LLD in the rustc sysroot so we can rename the tool as long as we don't break the wasm32-unknown-unknown target which depends on it.
r? @alexcrichton we discussed this before
|
|
|
|
This commit updates the stage0 build of tools to use the libraries of the stage0
compiler instead of the compiled libraries by the stage0 compiler. This should
enable us to avoid any stage0 hacks (like missing SIMD).
|
|
Did you mean to block nightlies on clippy?
Discussion: https://gitter.im/rust-lang/WG-clippy?at=5b073b6597a0361fb760cdc2
r? @alexcrichton
did I forget anything?
cc @nrc @Manishearth
|
|
|
|
|
|
to not shadow the system installed LLD when linking with LLD.
Before:
- `-C linker=lld -Z linker-flavor=ld.lld` uses rustc's LLD
- It's not possible to use a system installed LLD that's named `lld`
With this commit:
- `-C linker=rust-lld -Z linker-flavor=ld.lld` uses rustc's LLD
- `-C linker=lld -Z linker-flavor=ld.lld` uses the system installed LLD
|
|
|
|
Use `target` instead.
|
|
|
|
This commit expands on a previous commit to build llvm-tools as a rustup
component. It causes the llvm-tools component to be built if the
extended step is active. It also adds llvm-tools to the build manifest
so rustup can find it.
|
|
ship LLVM tools with the toolchain
this PR adds llvm-{nm,objcopy,objdump,size} to the rustc sysroot (right next to LLD)
this slightly increases the size of the rustc component. I measured these numbers on x86_64 Linux:
- rustc-1.27.0-dev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz 180M -> 193M (+7%)
- rustc-1.27.0-dev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.xz 129M -> 137M (+6%)
r? @alexcrichton
cc #49584
|
|
|
|
|
|
make is_tool inherent prop of mode
fix errors from rebase
resolve issues from review
|
|
|
|
This makes it go through boostrap/bin/rustc.rs, so it will use
-crt-static if needed.
|
|
|
|
add a dist builder to build rust-std components for the THUMB targets
the rust-std component only contains the core and compiler-builtins (+c +mem) crates
cc #49382
- I'm not entirely sure if this PR alone will produce rust-std components installable by rustup or if something else needs to be changed
- I could have done the THUMB builds in an existing builder / image; I wasn't sure if that was a good idea so I added a new image
- I could build other crates like alloc into the rust-std component but, AFAICT, that would require calling Cargo a second time (one for alloc and one for compiler-builtins), or have alloc depend on compiler-builtins (#49503 will perform that change) *and* have alloc resurface the "c" and "mem" Cargo features.
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
|
|
|
|
This ensures that each build will support the testing design of "dry
running" builds. It's also checked that a dry run build is equivalent
step-wise to a "wet" run build; the graphs we generate when running are
directly compared node/node and edge/edge, both for order and contents.
|
|
Ensures that test cases will be somewhat easier to write.
|
