| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
r=ollie27
Rustdoc remove old style files
Reopening of #56577 (which I can't seem to reopen...).
I made the flag unstable so with this change, what was blocking the PR is now gone I assume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit replaces many usages of `File::open` and reading or writing
with `fs::read_to_string`, `fs::read` and `fs::write`. This reduces code
complexity, and will improve performance for most reads, since the
functions allocate the buffer to be the size of the file.
I believe that this commit will not impact behavior in any way, so some
matches will check the error kind in case the file was not valid UTF-8.
Some of these cases may not actually care about the error.
|
|
rustbuild: Fix issues with compiler docs
* Create output directories for crates beforehand so rustdoc uses relative links (fixes #56107)
* Readd rustc_codegen_ssa (fixes #56196)
* Don't build out of tree dependencies for rustdoc like we don't for rustc
|
|
Remove some uses of try!
|
|
* Create output directories for crates beforehand so rustdoc uses relative links
* Readd rustc_codegen_ssa
* Don't build out of tree dependencies for rustdoc like we don't for rustc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add index page argument
@Mark-Simulacrum: I might need some help from you: in bootstrap, I want to add an argument (a new flag added into `rustdoc`) in order to generate the current index directly when `rustdoc` is documenting the `std` lib. However, my change in `bootstrap` didn't do it and I assume it must be moved inside the `Std` struct. But there, I don't see how to pass it to `rustdoc` through `cargo`. Did I miss anything?
r? @QuietMisdreavus
|
|
In addition to to updating Cargo's submodule and Cargo's dependencies,
this also updates Cargo's build to build OpenSSL statically into Cargo
as well as libcurl unconditionally. This removes OpenSSL build logic
from the bootstrap code, and otherwise requests that even on OSX we
build curl statically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its former contents are now in libcore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit updates the stage0 build of tools to use the libraries of the stage0
compiler instead of the compiled libraries by the stage0 compiler. This should
enable us to avoid any stage0 hacks (like missing SIMD).
|
|
make is_tool inherent prop of mode
fix errors from rebase
resolve issues from review
|
|
|
|
Added rustdoc documentation to compiler docs.
Fixes #50004.
r? @alexcrichton
(since you reviewed the last PR about compiler docs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add "the Rustc book"
This PR introduces a new book into the documentation, "The rustc book". We already have books for Cargo, and for Rustdoc, rustc should have some too. This book is focused on *users* of rustc, and provides a nice place to write documentation for users.
I haven't put content here, but plan on scaffolding it out very soon, and wanted this PR open for a few discussions first. One of those is "what exactly should said TOC be?" I plan on having a proposed one up tomorrow, but figured I'd let people know to start thinking about it now.
The big one is that we also will want to put https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rustc-guide in-tree as well, and the naming is... tough. I'm proposing:
* doc.rust-lang.org/rustc is "The Rustc book", to mirror the other tools' books.
* doc.rust-lang.org/rustc-contribution is "The Rustc contribution guide", and contains that book
@nikomatsakis et al, any thoughts on this? I'm not attached to it in particular, but had to put something together to get this discussion going. I think mirroring the other tools is a good idea for this work, but am not sure where exactly that leaves yours.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-docs/team/issues/11
|
|
|
|
r=steveklabnik,QuietMisdreavus,frewsxcv,GuillaumeGomez
Add docs for the test crate with the std docs
If the compiler docs aren't going to include the test crate then it may as well be included with std.
Fixes #49388
|
|
|
|
Host compiler documentation: Include private items
Fixes #29893. Now that compiler documentation is being hosted, including private items seems sensible as these types are going to be being used by contributors working on the compiler.
However, including this means that doc comments that contain codeblocks with invalid Rust and can fail the documenting of a given crate (as evidenced by the changes in the second commit included in this PR). We'd need some way of ensuring that this cannot happen so that these failures don't cause documenting to fail. I'm unsure whether this change to documentation steps will cause this to happen already or if something new will be required.
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
|
|
|
|
This ensures that each build will support the testing design of "dry
running" builds. It's also checked that a dry run build is equivalent
step-wise to a "wet" run build; the graphs we generate when running are
directly compared node/node and edge/edge, both for order and contents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the compiler docs aren't going to include the test crate then it may as well be included with std.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For LLD integration the path to `llvm-config` needed to change to inside the
build directory itself (for whatever reason) but the build directory is
different on MSBuild than it is on `ninja` for MSVC builds, so the path to
`llvm-config.exe` was actually wrong and not working!
This commit removes the `Build::llvm_config` function in favor of the source of
truth, the `Llvm` build step itself. The build step was then updated to find the
right build directory for MSBuild as well as `ninja` for where `llvm-config.exe`
is located.
Closes #48749
|
|
Currently, we are producing headers for markdown files,
which is generally not what we want. As such, passing this
flag causes them to render normally.
|
|
Previously, a Step would be able to tell on its own when it was invoked
"by-default" (that is, `./x.py test` was called instead of `./x.py test
some/path`). This commit replaces that functionality, invoking each Step
with each of the paths it has specified as "should be invoked by."
For example, if a step calls `path("src/tools/cargo")` and
`path("src/doc/cargo")` then it's make_run will be called twice, with
"src/tools/cargo" and "src/doc/cargo." This makes it so that default
handling logic is in builder, instead of spread across various Steps.
However, this meant that some Step specifications needed to be updated,
since for example `rustdoc` can be built by `./x.py build
src/librustdoc` or `./x.py build src/tools/rustdoc`. A `PathSet`
abstraction is added that handles this: now, each Step can not only list
`path(...)` but also `paths(&[a, b, ...])` which will make it so that we
don't invoke it with each of the individual paths, instead invoking it
with the first path in the list (though this shouldn't be depended on).
Future work likely consists of implementing a better/easier way for a
given Step to work with "any" crate in-tree, especially those that want
to run tests, build, or check crates in the std, test, or rustc crate
trees. Currently this is rather painful to do as most of the logic is
duplicated across should_run and make_run. It seems likely this can be
abstracted away into builder somehow.
|
