| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As rustbook now depends transitively on openssl, it needs access to the
rustc-workspace-hack/all-static feature to pick up openssl-sys/vendored.
This fixes the rust build with `all-static = true` on systems where
openssl is not installed (e.g. when cross-compiling).
|
|
This logic is *super* old and can be tweaked and moved into `builder.rs`
|
|
This commit changes the return type of `Builder::cargo` to return a
builder that allows dynamically adding more `RUSTFLAGS` values
after-the-fact. While not used yet, this will later be used to delete
more of `rustc.rs`
|
|
Since its inception rustbuild has always worked in three stages: one for
libstd, one for libtest, and one for rustc. These three stages were
architected around crates.io dependencies, where rustc wants to depend
on crates.io crates but said crates don't explicitly depend on libstd,
requiring a sysroot assembly step in the middle. This same logic was
applied for libtest where libtest wants to depend on crates.io crates
(`getopts`) but `getopts` didn't say that it depended on std, so it
needed `std` built ahead of time.
Lots of time has passed since the inception of rustbuild, however,
and we've since gotten to the point where even `std` itself is depending
on crates.io crates (albeit with some wonky configuration). This
commit applies the same logic to the two dependencies that the `test`
crate pulls in from crates.io, `getopts` and `unicode-width`. Over the
many years since rustbuild's inception `unicode-width` was the only
dependency picked up by the `test` crate, so the extra configuration
necessary to get crates building in this crate graph is unlikely to be
too much of a burden on developers.
After this patch it means that there are now only two build phasese of
rustbuild, one for libstd and one for rustc. The libtest/libproc_macro
build phase is all lumped into one now with `std`.
This was originally motivated by rust-lang/cargo#7216 where Cargo was
having to deal with synthesizing dependency edges but this commit makes
them explicit in this repository.
|
|
|
|
Now that we've fully moved to Azure Pipelines and bors has been updated
to only gate on Azure this commit removes the remaining Travis/AppVeyor
support contained in this repository. Most of the deletions here are
related to producing better output on Travis by folding certain
sections. This isn't supported by Azure so there's no need to keep it
around, and if Azure ever adds support we can always add it back!
|
|
In developing #61557 I noticed that there were two parts of our tools
that were rebuilt twice on CI. One was rustfmt fixed in #61557, but
another was Cargo. The actual fix for Cargo's double compile was
rust-lang/cargo#7010 and took some time to propagate here. In an effort
to continue to assert that Cargo is itself not compiled twice, I updated
the assertion in rustbuild at the time of working on #61557 but couldn't
land it because the fix wouldn't be ready until the next bootstrap.
The next bootstrap is now here, so the fix can now land! This does not
change the behavior of rustbuild but it is intended to catch the
previous iteration of compiling cargo twice. The main update here was to
consider more files than those in `$target/release/deps` but also
consider those in `$target/release`. That's where, for example,
`libcargo.rlib` shows up and it's the file we learn about, and that's
what we want to deduplicate.
|
|
Removing the tool argument in the previous commit means it's no longer
restricted to just bootstrap tools despite being written as such.
Inlining it prevents accidental use.
|
|
|
|
Currently `rustfmt` is excluded from the "don't build dependencies
twice" check but it's currently building dependencies twice! Namely big
dependencies like `rustc-ap-syntax` are built once for rustfmt and once
for the RLS. This commit includes `rustfmt` in these checks and then
fixes the resulting feature mismatches for winapi.
|
|
ci: Attempt to skip a full rustc compile on dist*
Currently when we're preparing cross-compiled compilers it can take
quite some time because we have to build the compiler itself three
different times. The first is the normal bootstrap, the second is a
second build for the build platform, and the third is the actual target
architecture compiler. The second compiler was historically built
exclusively for procedural macros, and long ago we didn't actually need
it.
This commit tries out avoiding that second compiled compiler, meaning we
only compile rustc for the build platform only once. Some local testing
shows that this is promising, but bors is of course the ultimate test!
|
|
Currently when we're preparing cross-compiled compilers it can take
quite some time because we have to build the compiler itself three
different times. The first is the normal bootstrap, the second is a
second build for the build platform, and the third is the actual target
architecture compiler. The second compiler was historically built
exclusively for procedural macros, and long ago we didn't actually need
it.
This commit tries out avoiding that second compiled compiler, meaning we
only compile rustc for the build platform only once. Some local testing
shows that this is promising, but bors is of course the ultimate test!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rework how bootstrap tools are built
This makes bootstrap tools buildable and testable in stage 0 with the downloaded bootstrap compiler, futhermore, it makes it such that they cannot be built in any other stage.
Notably, this will also mean that compiletest may need to wait a cycle before it can use changes to `libtest`, as it no longer depends on the in-tree libtest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This allows us to e.g. test compiletest, including doctests, in stage 0
without building a fresh compiler and rustdoc.
|
|
This avoids building compilers that we don't need -- most tools will work
just fine with the downloaded compiler.
|
|
|
|
Fixes rustdoc in stage 0, stage 1
When a request for rustdoc is passed for stage 0, x.py build --stage 0
src/tools/rustdoc or ensure(tool::Rustdoc { .. }) with top_stage = 0, we
return the rustdoc for that compiler (i.e., the beta rustdoc).
This fixes stage 0 of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52186 as well as being part of general workflow improvements (making stage 0 testing for std work) for rustbuild.
The stage 1 fix (second commit) completely resolves the problem, so this fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52186.
|
|
The RUSTDOC_LIBDIR should be rustc_libdir, not sysroot_libdir; rustdoc
is like the compiler and should link against rustc's libdir.
Some people currently (i.e., in general, may not be on master) have doc
tests working, but no attempt to determine why has been attempted.
|
|
When a request for rustdoc is passed for stage 0, x.py build --stage 0
src/tools/rustdoc or ensure(tool::Rustdoc { .. }) with top_stage = 0, we
return the rustdoc for that compiler (i.e., the beta rustdoc).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When building a distributed compiler on Linux where we use ThinLTO to
create the LLVM shared object this commit switches the compiler to
dynamically linking that LLVM artifact instead of statically linking to
LLVM. The primary goal here is to reduce CI compile times, avoiding two+
ThinLTO builds of all of LLVM. By linking dynamically to LLVM we'll
reuse the one ThinLTO step done by LLVM's build itself.
Lots of discussion about this change can be found [here] and down. A
perf run will show whether this is worth it or not!
[here]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53245#issuecomment-417015334
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit f1051b574c26e20608ff26415a3dddd13f140925, reversing
changes made to 833e0b3b8a9f1487a61152ca76f7f74a6b32cc0c.
|
|
When building a distributed compiler on Linux where we use ThinLTO to
create the LLVM shared object this commit switches the compiler to
dynamically linking that LLVM artifact instead of statically linking to
LLVM. The primary goal here is to reduce CI compile times, avoiding two+
ThinLTO builds of all of LLVM. By linking dynamically to LLVM we'll
reuse the one ThinLTO step done by LLVM's build itself.
Lots of discussion about this change can be found [here] and down. A
perf run will show whether this is worth it or not!
[here]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53245#issuecomment-417015334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clippy uses it to identify the correct documentation to point to
|
