about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/bootstrap
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-08-23remove default opts from configbit-aloo-53/+0
2025-08-22Add warning to the `Builder::llvm_config` functionJakub Beránek-0/+4
2025-08-22Ship LLVM tools for the correct target when cross-compilingJakub Beránek-5/+43
2025-08-22Auto merge of #145352 - Shourya742:2025-08-12-remove-default-config, r=Kobzolbors-563/+527
Remove default config from bootstrap This PR removes the default config initialization from parse_inner, as it introduced many assumptions during config setup. Instead, each variable is now manually initialized to eliminate certain invariants in parse_inner and streamline the process. r? `@Kobzol`
2025-08-22Rename `llvm_config` to `host_llvm_config` to avoid confusionJakub Beránek-36/+39
2025-08-22Add aarch64_be-unknown-hermit targetJens Reidel-0/+1
Signed-off-by: Jens Reidel <adrian@travitia.xyz>
2025-08-22Sort Config fields and remove some `mut`s from bindingsJakub Beránek-198/+210
2025-08-21Rollup merge of #145703 - Gelbpunkt:ci-llvm-mips, r=KobzolJacob Pratt-4/+0
Remove MIPS targets from CI LLVM platforms All of these were demoted to tier 3 a while ago and we aren't building LLVM for them anymore.
2025-08-21Promote aarch64-pc-windows-msvc to Tier 1Daniel Paoliello-1/+1
2025-08-21Remove MIPS targets from CI LLVM platformsJens Reidel-4/+0
All of these were demoted to tier 3 a while ago and we aren't building LLVM for them anymore. Signed-off-by: Jens Reidel <adrian@travitia.xyz>
2025-08-21Rollup merge of #145654 - Kobzol:gcc-ci-root, r=jieyouxuJacob Pratt-3/+3
Download CI GCC into the correct directory While doing various experiments with stage3 cross-compilations, I realized that bootstrap is unable to download LLVM from CI for a non-host target, which is quite annoying. Fixing this for LLVM will take some work, but in the meantime we can easily fix this for `download-ci-gcc`, which was implemented in a much more self-contained way.
2025-08-21Rollup merge of #145390 - joshtriplett:rustc-diag-value-earlier, r=lcnrJacob Pratt-5/+5
Shorten some dependency chains in the compiler (I recommend reviewing this commit by commit.) One of the long dependency chains in the compiler is: - Many things depend on `rustc_errors`. - `rustc_errors` depended on many things prior to this PR, including `rustc_target`, `rustc_type_ir`, `rustc_hir`, and `rustc_lint_defs`. - `rustc_lint_defs` depended on `rustc_hir` prior to this PR. - `rustc_hir` depends on `rustc_target`. - `rustc_target` is large and takes a while. This PR breaks that chain, through a few steps: - The `IntoDiagArgs` trait, from `rustc_errors`, moves earlier in the dependency chain. This allows `rustc_errors` to stop depending on a pile of crates just to implement `IntoDiagArgs` for their types. - Split `rustc_hir_id` out of `rustc_hir`, so crates that just need `HirId` and similar don't depend on all of `rust_hir` (and thus `rustc_target`). - Make `rustc_lint_defs` stop depending on `rustc_hir`.
2025-08-21Rollup merge of #145256 - GuillaumeGomez:bootstrap-test-codegen-backend, ↵Jacob Pratt-7/+58
r=Kobzol,bjorn3 Add new `--test-codegen-backend` bootstrap option This new bootstrap command line flag allows to do: ```shell ./x.py test tests/ui/intrinsics/panic-uninitialized-zeroed.rs --stage 1 -j8 --test-codegen-backend gcc ``` This is the last step before running it into the CI. Supersedes rust-lang/rust#144687. r? ``````@Kobzol``````
2025-08-21move few complex initialization from config to parse-innerbit-aloo-49/+61
2025-08-20Update test output for change to number of cratesJosh Triplett-5/+5
2025-08-20make download context lean and remove mutable typesbit-aloo-79/+89
2025-08-20remove unwanted references, and make more initialization inlinebit-aloo-22/+14
2025-08-20add explicit defaultsbit-aloo-4/+4
2025-08-20use local variables coming from toml, directly from tomlbit-aloo-11/+7
2025-08-20remove now not required _bit-aloo-115/+115
2025-08-20Auto merge of #145645 - Kobzol:uplift-fix, r=jieyouxubors-9/+82
Fix rustc uplifting (take two) The rustc uplifting logic is really annoying.. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145557 was not enough to fix it. Consider https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145534#issuecomment-3201868888: in this situation, we do a stage3 build of a cross-compiled rustc (it happens because we run `x test --stage 2`, which mistakenly builds a stage3 rustc, but it doesn't matter what casuses it, what matters is that the stage3 build isn't working). Currently, a stage3 cross-compiled build of rustc works like this: 1) stage0 (host) -> stage1 (host) 2) stage1 (host) -> stage2 (host) 3) stage2 (host) -> stage3 (target) The problem is that in the uplifting logic, I assumed that we will have a stage2 (target) rustc available, which we can uplift. And that would indeed be an ideal solution. But currently, we will actually build a stage2 (*host*) rustc, and only then start the cross-compilation. So the uplifting is broken. I spend a couple of hours trying to fix this, and do the uplifting "from the other direction", so that already when we assemble a stage3 rustc, we notice that an uplift should happen, and we only build stage1 (host) rustc, which also helps avoid one needless rustc build. However, this was relatively complicated and would require larger changes that I was not confident landing at this time. So instead I decided to do a much simpler fix, and just disable rustc uplifting when cross-compiling. Since we currently do the `stage2 (host) -> stage3 (target)` step, it should not actually affect stage3 cross-compiled builds in any way (I hope..), and should only affect stage4+ builds, about which I don't really care (the only change there should be more rustc builds). For normal builds, the stage2 host rustc should (hopefully) always be present, so we shouldn't run into this issue. Eventually, I would like to remove rustc uplifting completely. However, `x test --stage 2` on CI still currently builds a stage3 rustc for some reason, and if we removed uplifting completely, even for non-cross-compiled builds, that would cause an additional rustc build, and that's not great. So for now let's just allow uplifting for non-cross-compiled builds. Fixes rust-lang/rust#145534. r? `@jieyouxu`
2025-08-20Download CI GCC into the correct directoryJakub Beránek-3/+3
2025-08-20Split compiletest `--codegen-backend` into two options ↵Guillaume Gomez-4/+7
`--default-codegen-backend` and `--override-codegen-backend`
2025-08-20Add new `--test-codegen-backend` bootstrap optionGuillaume Gomez-6/+54
2025-08-20Disable rustc uplifting during cross-compilationJakub Beránek-9/+6
2025-08-19Auto merge of #145601 - jieyouxu:rollup-t5mbqhc, r=jieyouxubors-34/+39
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#145538 (bufreader::Buffer::backshift: don't move the uninit bytes) - rust-lang/rust#145542 (triagebot: Don't warn no-mentions on subtree updates) - rust-lang/rust#145549 (Update rust maintainers in openharmony.md) - rust-lang/rust#145550 (Avoid using `()` in `derive(From)` output.) - rust-lang/rust#145556 (Allow stability attributes on extern crates) - rust-lang/rust#145560 (Remove unused `PartialOrd`/`Ord` from bootstrap) - rust-lang/rust#145568 (ignore frontmatters in `TokenStream::new`) - rust-lang/rust#145571 (remove myself from some adhoc-groups and pings) - rust-lang/rust#145576 (Add change tracker entry for `--timings`) - rust-lang/rust#145578 (Add VEXos "linked files" support to `armv7a-vex-v5`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-08-19Add snapshot tests for stage 3 compiler buildsJakub Beránek-0/+76
2025-08-19Rollup merge of #145576 - jieyouxu:bootstrap-timings, r=Kobzol许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)-0/+5
Add change tracker entry for `--timings` Follow-up to rust-lang/rust#145379. Forgor when reviewing. r? `@Kobzol`
2025-08-19Rollup merge of #145560 - Kobzol:bootstrap-remove-ord, r=jieyouxu许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)-34/+34
Remove unused `PartialOrd`/`Ord` from bootstrap It was just wasting compile-time. There is one remaining "old" bootstrap test that uses the `Ord` impl on one test step, I'll remove that later.
2025-08-19Rollup merge of #145490 - Kobzol:bootstrap-io-tracing, r=jieyouxu许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)-27/+86
Trace some basic I/O operations in bootstrap When working on removing the rmeta sysroot copies, it is quite difficult to figure out *why* was did a certain file appear in a given directory. This should help with that a bit. r? `@jieyouxu`
2025-08-19Rollup merge of #145452 - Kobzol:bootstrap-strip, r=jieyouxu许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)-1/+12
Do not strip binaries in bootstrap everytime if they are unchanged I was profiling bootstrap to figure out why a no-op build takes upward of two seconds on my machine. I found that half of that is Cargo (which is mostly unavoidable) and the rest (~900ms) is running strip. We don't need to restrip already stripped binaries all the time. r? `@jieyouxu`
2025-08-19Rollup merge of #145565 - Kobzol:bootstrap-ci-print-error, r=jieyouxuStuart Cook-0/+4
Improve context of bootstrap errors in CI Inspired by https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/printing.20test.20suite.20name.20by.20default/with/534920583, this PR attempts to improve the context displayed when a bootstrap invocation fails in CI. Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145261, we now see the latest started step when a failure occurs. However, we can go further. 1) The first commit prints the actual executed bootstrap invocation command arguments when bootstrap ends. Since CI jobs often run multiple bootstrap commands, this makes it easier to figure out which one of them failed (before it was annoying having to search for that in CI logs). Because bootstrap doesn't really use `Result`s much, and most of them time it ends with the `detail_exit` function, which YOLOs `std::process::exit(...)`, I added the print there. 2) Adds `#[track_caller]` to a few bootstrap Cargo builder functions. This makes the log that we print when a command fails more accurate: ``` 2025-08-16T18:18:51.6998201Z Command ... failed ... 2025-08-16T18:18:51.7003653Z Created at: src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/cargo.rs:423:33 2025-08-16T18:18:51.7004032Z Executed at: src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/doc.rs:933:26 ``` Before, the `cargo.rs:XYZ` location wasn't very useful. 3) Is the most wild thing (I'll revert if you find it too magical). We store the step stack of the currently active `Builder` instance in a global variable, and when bootstrap exits with a failure, we print the stack, to make it easier to find out what was happening when a failure occurred. We could print an actual captured `Backtrace`, but I think that would be too much information in the common case. We now pass `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` on CI, so if bootstrap actually crashes unexpectedly, we would see the stacktrace. The end of the bootsrap failure log in CI now looks like this now: ``` Bootstrap failed while executing `x build library` ---BOOTSTRAP step stack start--- Assemble { target_compiler: Compiler { stage: 1, host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, forced_compiler: false } } Rustc { target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, build_compiler: Compiler { stage: 0, host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, forced_compiler: false }, crates: [] } ---BOOTSTRAP step stack end--- ``` r? `@jieyouxu`
2025-08-19Rollup merge of #145557 - Kobzol:rustc-link-fix, r=jieyouxuStuart Cook-34/+78
Fix uplifting in `Assemble` step In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145310, I removed [this line](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145310/files#diff-5a1e05f2688d271039171a547d407d0c8a96715ee64d35562fc76b4c9a874303L2109), which adjusted the stage of the build compiler if an uplift has happened. This broke stage3+ uplifted rustc builds (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145534). I could swear I tested this in the PR, but somehow I missed it. Instead of keeping the original returned stage, I made it more explicit by returning the actually used `build_compiler` from the `Rustc` step, and then use that in the `Assemble` step. The changes to `RustcLink` were needed to fix `ui-fulldeps`, which apparently build a stage3 rustc, because I haven't fixed the test steps yet :sweat_smile: Hopefully we might be able to remove `RustcLink` if the approach from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144252 will work. Should fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145534. r? ``@jieyouxu``
2025-08-19Rollup merge of #144252 - Kobzol:rmeta-sysroot, r=jieyouxuStuart Cook-88/+335
Do not copy .rmeta files into the sysroot of the build compiler during check of rustc/std Before, when bootstrap did a check build of rustc stage N (with a build compiler that was stage N-1), it automatically copied the resulting `.rmeta` artifacts into the sysroot of the stage N-1 build compiler, so that stage N `rustc_private` tools such as `miri` could be compiled using the stage N-1 build compiler. This has a number of issues: - It was done unconditionally, even if no `rustc_private` tools were actually built. - If we did a check and a build of the same stage compiler in the same bootstrap invocation, the generated rmeta and rlib files could clash. This is also why you can see that `check::Std` actually doesn't copy the artifacts anymore (which forced us to build std instead of just checking it in a bunch of `Check` steps). - It was polluting the sysroot of the build compiler. This is especially annoying for the stage 0 compiler, because we are forced to create an artificial sysroot for it, so that we can copy new stuff into it. - It was very implicit in bootstrap. Based on suggestions by ```@cuviper``` and ```@bjorn3,``` I tried to change how this behaves. Instead of copying the rmeta artifacts into the sysroot of the build compiler (from where they would be loaded implicitly), they are now stored in a separate transient bootstrap build directory, and they are then explicitly passed *only* when checking `rustc_private` tools using the `-L` flag. The flags are passed out-of-band through our rustc wrapper, to avoid invalidating the build cache. This is the first commit. The second commit does the same for std. For a few months, we used to build std instead of just checking it when doing a cross-compile check of something that required std, this now fixes it. There is still the previous ordering requirement though, that `check::Std` has to be executed as the last check step, or rather nothing that requires checked std should be executed *after* it, because it will run into rmeta/rlib duplications (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/4fa90ef7996f891f7f1e126411e5d75afe64accf/src/bootstrap/src/core/builder/mod.rs#L1066). I tried to fix in this PR, but it quickly runs into the fact that building things currently copies *rlib* artifacts into the build compiler sysroot. I want to fix that as one of the next steps. After we get rid of all the copies (or rather, we only do the copies for dist/stage2+ and do not copy anything into the stage0 compiler's sysroot), we could hopefully finally get rid of `stage0-sysroot`. Based on my local tests, this seems to be working fine. If it works on CI, and we don't run into other issues after merging it, I'd like to do the same also for rlib artifacts generated during `x build`. r? ```@jieyouxu```
2025-08-18Assume UTF-8 in sysroot pathsJakub Beránek-1/+1
2025-08-18Fix uplifting in `Assemble` stepJakub Beránek-34/+78
2025-08-18remove downstream new methodbit-aloo-51/+12
2025-08-18Add change tracker entry for `--timings`Jieyou Xu-0/+5
2025-08-18Provide more useful command creation spansJakub Beránek-0/+4
2025-08-18Remove unused `PartialOrd`/`Ord` from bootstrapJakub Beránek-34/+34
2025-08-18Do not overwrite the value of `RUSTC_ADDITIONAL_SYSROOT_PATHS`Jakub Beránek-1/+28
2025-08-18Trace some basic I/O operations in bootstrapJakub Beránek-27/+86
2025-08-18clippy'edbit-aloo-1/+1
2025-08-18remove default configbit-aloo-582/+563
2025-08-16Only check std in cross-compilation instead of building itJakub Beránek-57/+153
2025-08-16Avoid copying rustc rmeta artifacts into the build compiler sysrootJakub Beránek-65/+189
This helps to avoid polluting the sysroot of the build compiler.
2025-08-16Optimize `copy_src_dirs`Jakub Beránek-39/+42
2025-08-16Do not call `fs::remove_file` in `cp_link_filtered_recurse`Jakub Beránek-1/+0
The target is removed by `copy_link` too, so no need to duplicate the syscall.
2025-08-15Rollup merge of #145455 - Kobzol:bootstrap-copy-src-dirs-dry-run, r=jieyouxuJacob Pratt-0/+6
Do not copy files in `copy_src_dirs` in dry run This reduces the time to run the current 9 dist snapshot tests from ~24s to ~2s on my PC. r? `@jieyouxu`
2025-08-15Rollup merge of #145454 - Kobzol:bootstrap-fix-step-debug-repr, r=jieyouxuJacob Pratt-3/+8
Fix tracing debug representation of steps without arguments in bootstrap I was wondering why I see `lainSourceTarbal` in tracing logs... r? `@jieyouxu`