| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
previous commit.
The previous commit could be part of the current PR.
|
|
Previously, this would be caught by a change for modified submodules;
now that rustfmt is no longer a submodule, the check needs to be
explicit.
|
|
- Add rustfmt to `x.py check`
- Update Cargo.lock
- Remove rustfmt from the toolstate list
- Make rustfmt an in-tree tool
- Give an error on `x.py test rustfmt` if rustfmt fails to build or if tests fail
- Don't call `save_toolstate` when testing rustfmt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retry clang+llvm download
We've been seeing a pretty high rate of spurious network failures (e.g., openssl
connection reset by peer). Not clear why, but let's add a retry.
r? `@pietroalbini`
|
|
|
|
This will make it easier for tools to programmatically detect which
channel CI is building.
|
|
We've been seeing a pretty high rate of spurious network failures (e.g., openssl
connection reset by peer). Not clear why, but let's add a retry.
|
|
Needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84764 . Tarballs
already uploaded to the CI mirror bucket.
|
|
Currently, we have LLVM tarballs for win64, generated by someone running
the installer via wine and tarring up the result.
7z knows how to extract NSIS installers directly, and the result is
identical to our tarball, except that it doesn't include `Uninstall.exe`
(which we don't care about) and it includes the NSIS plugin directory
(which we also don't care about).
This simplifies the process of upgrading CI, and allows us to just
mirror the upstream release .exe directly. This also improves our
supply chain.
|
|
Build sanitizers for x86_64-unknown-linux-musl
The support of sanitizers on target `x86_64-unknown-linux-musl` is landed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84126
|
|
|
|
further split up const_fn feature flag
This continues the work on splitting up `const_fn` into separate feature flags:
* `const_fn_trait_bound` for `const fn` with trait bounds
* `const_fn_unsize` for unsizing coercions in `const fn` (looks like only `dyn` unsizing is still guarded here)
I don't know if there are even any things left that `const_fn` guards... at least libcore and liballoc do not need it any more.
`@oli-obk` are you currently able to do reviews?
|
|
|
|
The old version was renamed to
`expat-2.2.6-RENAMED-VULNERABLE-PLEASE-USE-2.3.0-INSTEAD`. :)
|
|
This commit implements the idea of a new ABI for the WebAssembly target,
one called `"wasm"`. This ABI is entirely of my own invention
and has no current precedent, but I think that the addition of this ABI
might help solve a number of issues with the WebAssembly targets.
When `wasm32-unknown-unknown` was first added to Rust I naively
"implemented an abi" for the target. I then went to write `wasm-bindgen`
which accidentally relied on details of this ABI. Turns out the ABI
definition didn't match C, which is causing issues for C/Rust interop.
Currently the compiler has a "wasm32 bindgen compat" ABI which is the
original implementation I added, and it's purely there for, well,
`wasm-bindgen`.
Another issue with the WebAssembly target is that it's not clear to me
when and if the default C ABI will change to account for WebAssembly's
multi-value feature (a feature that allows functions to return multiple
values). Even if this does happen, though, it seems like the C ABI will
be guided based on the performance of WebAssembly code and will likely
not match even what the current wasm-bindgen-compat ABI is today. This
leaves a hole in Rust's expressivity in binding WebAssembly where given
a particular import type, Rust may not be able to import that signature
with an updated C ABI for multi-value.
To fix these issues I had the idea of a new ABI for WebAssembly, one
called `wasm`. The definition of this ABI is "what you write
maps straight to wasm". The goal here is that whatever you write down in
the parameter list or in the return values goes straight into the
function's signature in the WebAssembly file. This special ABI is for
intentionally matching the ABI of an imported function from the
environment or exporting a function with the right signature.
With the addition of a new ABI, this enables rustc to:
* Eventually remove the "wasm-bindgen compat hack". Once this
ABI is stable wasm-bindgen can switch to using it everywhere.
Afterwards the wasm32-unknown-unknown target can have its default ABI
updated to match C.
* Expose the ability to precisely match an ABI signature for a
WebAssembly function, regardless of what the C ABI that clang chooses
turns out to be.
* Continue to evolve the definition of the default C ABI to match what
clang does on all targets, since the purpose of that ABI will be
explicitly matching C rather than generating particular function
imports/exports.
Naturally this is implemented as an unstable feature initially, but it
would be nice for this to get stabilized (if it works) in the near-ish
future to remove the wasm32-unknown-unknown incompatibility with the C
ABI. Doing this, however, requires the feature to be on stable because
wasm-bindgen works with stable Rust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use checkout@v2 in CI for master
Updates CI workflow to use checkout@v2 from v1 (as other parts of CI) for master, plus slightly faster checkout as result
compare v2
https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/2ccf06302c08d7d4911aad40e66a9a3ee731c6f9/checks/2113902859/logs
and v1 logs
https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/commit/2ccf06302c08d7d4911aad40e66a9a3ee731c6f9/checks/2115229351/logs
|
|
Simplify C compilation for Fortanix-SGX target
cc ``@raoulstrackx``
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain features of Linux (getauxval() and epoll_create1()) are only
available in android SDK/NDK levels 18 and 21 respectively. The 32bit
platform is currently on level 14 for compatibility with Android 4.0.
This patch adds SDK/NDK level 21 to the docker for 32 bit platforms,
while leaving the default setup at level 14.
With this done, projects such as `rustup` which rely on these dockers
can build with modern ecosystem crates such as tokio 1.0, by using
the level 21 toolchain, but those which do not need to switch will
be unaffected, since the level 14 toolchain remains available.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@digital-scurf.org>
|
|
Pin es-check version to prevent unrelated CI failures
es-check v5.2.1 causes a lot of unrelated CI failures on mingw-check, e.g. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80723#issuecomment-790294196.
es-check v5.2.2 fixes it but let's pin its version to prevent further failures.
|
|
Upgrade to LLVM 12
This implements the necessary adjustments to make rustc work with LLVM 12. I didn't encounter any major issues so far.
r? `@cuviper`
|
|
|
|
musl-toolchain.sh is called with REPLACE_CC=1, so it will replace
the host compiler and the subsequent cmake build will fail because
it cannot find the openssl headers.
Move the cmake build earlier, so it happens before the compiler
is replaced.
|
|
Python 2 is needed for Clang 10, Python 3 for LLVM 12.
The Python 2 dependency could be removed by upgrading to Clang 11,
but that causes linker errors of unclear origin.
|
|
LLVM requires CMake 3.13.4, which is only available as of Ubuntu 20.04.
On images using an older version, build it manually.
|
|
|
|
fix env var name in CI
There no `SKIP_JOBS` env var name, only `SKIP_JOB`.
|
|
Closes #81514
|
|
|
|
Rustdoc gui tests
This is a reopening of #70533.
For this first version, there will be no screenshot comparison. Also, a big change compared to the previous version: the tests are now hosted in the rust repository directly. Since there is no image, it's pretty lightweight to say the least.
So now, only remains the nodejs script to run the tests and the tests themselves. Just one thing is missing: where should I put the documentation for these tests? I'm not sure where would be the best place for that. The doc will contain important information like the documentation of the framework used and how to install it (`npm install browser-ui-test`, but still needs to be put somewhere so no one is lost).
We'd also need to install the package when running the CI too. For now, it runs as long as we have nodejs installed, but I think we don't it to run in all nodejs targets?
cc `@jyn514`
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't release Miri if its tests only failed on Windows
Extends #66053 to Windows, so the released Miri won't be broken if its tests only fail on Windows.
Relevant Zulip thread: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/269128-miri/topic/Miri.20is.20still.20available.20in.20rustup.20today.3F
|
|
|
|
Upgrade wasm32 image to Ubuntu 20.04
This switches the wasm32 image, which is used to test
wasm32-unknown-emscripten, to Ubuntu 20.04. While at it, enable
most of the excluded tests, as they seem to work fine with some
minor fixes.
|
|
This switches the wasm32 image, which is used to test
wasm32-unknown-emscripten to Ubuntu 20.04. While at it, enable
most of the excluded tests, as they seem to work fine with some
minor fixes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CI: only copy python.exe to python3.exe if the latter does not exist
We're copying the binary to make sure we can call `python3.exe` around, but it seems like the base image of GitHub Actions changed, copying the file before we do so. This PR changes the CI script to only copy the file if it doesn't already exist.
r? `@m-ou-se`
cc `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
We're copying the binary to make sure we can call python3.exe around,
but it seems like the base image of GitHub Actions changed, copying the
file before we do so.
This commit changes the CI script to only copy the file if it doesn't
already exist.
|
|
Update test-various to Ubuntu 20.04
The test command-setgroups.rs is adjusted to skip on musl, where `sysconf(_SC_NGROUPS_MAX)` always returns a dummy value of 32, even though the actual value is 65536. I'm not sure why this only became a problem now, as the information I found indicates that this value changed in kernel version 2.6.4, which is ages ago.
I'm a bit unsure whether this one will go through, because I locally also saw a failure in std-backtrace.rs which went away on subsequent runs, and also had port assignment failures, but I think those might be on my side. I'm kind of curious how the code in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/b122908617436af187252572ed5db96850551380/library/std/src/net/test.rs#L43-L56 is supposed to work, as the directory names it checks don't seem to appear anywhere else.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
Update armhf-gnu to Ubuntu 20.04
This requires updating the used Linux kernel to avoid an assembler
error, the used busybox version to avoid a linker error, the used
rootfs to match the host version and the qemu flags to work with
the newer version.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
