| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 6342aa62efd1b3aa7e1bc8f834f317290b11c519.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221
The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when
writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the
possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot
because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak
of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other
circumlocutions.
Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when
operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate
out a section describing the "Err-producing" case.
We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as
an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology
accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe.
To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead.
Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this
will work on UNIX based systems:
grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g'
You can of course also do this by hand.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This makes it consistent with the same functions for slices,
and allows the search closure to be specified last.
[breaking-change]
|
|
arrays.
|
|
|
|
This was only ever a transitionary macro.
|
|
[breaking-change]
|
|
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Added `// no-pretty-expanded` to pretty-print a test, but not run it through
the `expanded` variant.
* Removed #[deriving] and other expanded attributes after they are expanded
* Removed hacks around &str and &&str and friends (from both the parser and the
pretty printer).
* Un-ignored a bunch of tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now it is possible to specify run-flags in tests. For example, by using `run-flags: --bench` the Bencher is run.
|
|
Now it is possible to specify run-flags in tests. For example, by using `run-flags: --bench` the Bencher is run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(And fix some tests.)
|
|
`~[T]` in test, libgetopts, compiletest, librustdoc, and libnum.
|
|
Most IO related functions return an IoResult so that the caller can handle failure
in whatever way is appropriate. However, the `lines`, `bytes`, and `chars` iterators all
supress errors. This means that code that needs to handle errors can't use any of these
iterators. All three of these iterators were updated to produce IoResults.
Fixes #12368
|
|
The new methodology can be found in the re-worded comment, but the gist of it is
that -C prefer-dynamic doesn't turn off static linkage. The error messages
should also be a little more sane now.
Closes #12133
|
|
When tests fail, their stdout and stderr is printed as part of the summary, but
this helps suppress failure messages from #[should_fail] tests and generally
clean up the output of the test runner.
|
|
Loadable syntax extensions don't work when cross compiling (see #12102), so the
fourcc tests all need to be ignored. They're valuable tests, so they shouldn't
be outright ignored, so they're now flagged with ignore-cross-compile
|
|
|
|
|
|
The new macro loading infrastructure needs the ability to force a
procedural-macro crate to be built with the host architecture rather than the
target architecture (because the compiler is just about to dlopen it).
|
|
* Reexport io::mem and io::buffered structs directly under io, make mem/buffered
private modules
* Remove with_mem_writer
* Remove DEFAULT_CAPACITY and use DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE (in io::buffered)
cc #11119
|
|
The new macro loading infrastructure needs the ability to force a
procedural-macro crate to be built with the host architecture rather than the
target architecture (because the compiler is just about to dlopen it).
|
|
* Reexport io::mem and io::buffered structs directly under io, make mem/buffered
private modules
* Remove with_mem_writer
* Remove DEFAULT_CAPACITY and use DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE (in io::buffered)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- `Buffer.lines()` returns `LineIterator` which yields line using
`.read_line()`.
- `Reader.bytes()` now takes `&mut self` instead of `self`.
- `Reader.read_until()` swallows `EndOfFile`. This also affects
`.read_line()`.
|
|
This reverts commit c54427ddfbbab41a39d14f2b1dc4f080cbc2d41b.
Leave the #[ignores] in that were added to rustpkg tests.
Conflicts:
src/librustc/driver/driver.rs
src/librustc/metadata/creader.rs
|
|
|
|
compile-fail tests, run-fail tests, and run-pass tests.
|
|
language.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This adds bindings to the remaining functions provided by libuv, all of which
are useful operations on files which need to get exposed somehow.
Some highlights:
* Dropped `FileReader` and `FileWriter` and `FileStream` for one `File` type
* Moved all file-related methods to be static methods under `File`
* All directory related methods are still top-level functions
* Created `io::FilePermission` types (backed by u32) that are what you'd expect
* Created `io::FileType` and refactored `FileStat` to use FileType and
FilePermission
* Removed the expanding matrix of `FileMode` operations. The mode of reading a
file will not have the O_CREAT flag, but a write mode will always have the
O_CREAT flag.
Closes #10130
Closes #10131
Closes #10121
|
|
This commit moves all thread-blocking I/O functions from the std::os module.
Their replacements can be found in either std::rt::io::file or in a hidden
"old_os" module inside of native::file. I didn't want to outright delete these
functions because they have a lot of special casing learned over time for each
OS/platform, and I imagine that these will someday get integrated into a
blocking implementation of IoFactory. For now, they're moved to a private module
to prevent bitrot and still have tests to ensure that they work.
I've also expanded the extensions to a few more methods defined on Path, most of
which were previously defined in std::os but now have non-thread-blocking
implementations as part of using the current IoFactory.
The api of io::file is in flux, but I plan on changing it in the next commit as
well.
Closes #10057
|
|
Who doesn't like a massive renaming?
|
