| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
That sentence made it look like there was no option for using 'mut'
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was reading through the Rust Guide (hopefully looking to learn some Rust), and I figured it would be a good idea to open a pull request with some of the errata I noticed along the way. Most of the changes are pretty mundane, but there are a couple that might raise a bit of discussion.
### Punctuation outside of 'key term' quotes
This is something that was inconsistent in the Guide. While the convention in American English is to place punctuation immediately following a quotation mark *inside* the quotation mark, it seems strange to do this with 'key terms', considering they are not a true quotation.
### Changed comment placement in 17.2 code block
This is what the code block in [17.2 — Ownership, borrowing, and lifetimes](http://doc.rust-lang.org/guide.html#ownership,-borrowing,-and-lifetimes) looks like in fullscreened Safari 8:
Some of the comments extend *just* too far, causing them to bleed into the next line, so I moved a few of them above the relevant lines of code to avoid this.
|
|
That sentence made it look like there was no option for using 'mut'
|
|
- Various grammatical changes
- Place punctuation outside of key term quotes
- Change comment placement in 17.2 code block
- Replace double hyphens with en dashes
|
|
This commit is part of a series that introduces a `std::thread` API to
replace `std::task`.
In the new API, `spawn` returns a `JoinGuard`, which by default will
join the spawned thread when dropped. It can also be used to join
explicitly at any time, returning the thread's result. Alternatively,
the spawned thread can be explicitly detached (so no join takes place).
As part of this change, Rust processes now terminate when the main
thread exits, even if other detached threads are still running, moving
Rust closer to standard threading models. This new behavior may break code
that was relying on the previously implicit join-all.
In addition to the above, the new thread API also offers some built-in
support for building blocking abstractions in user space; see the module
doc for details.
Closes #18000
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
On the [guide site](http://doc.rust-lang.org/guide.html#if) I was confused when I got to "5 If". It looked like "5 LF" in lowercase.
Changing the if to lowercase solves this problem. I know titles are all capitalized, but I think it makes sense in this case to keep it lowercase, since `if` is a reserved word. I'd also be open to making it ``` `if` ``` but I'm not sure how that would look on the site.
Before:
After:
|
|
In US english, "that" is used in restrictive clauses in place of
"which", and often affects the meaning of sentences.
In UK english and many dialects, no distinction is
made.
While Rust devs want to avoid unproductive pedanticism, it is worth at
least being uniform in documentation such as:
http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/index.html
and also in cases where correct usage of US english clarifies the
sentence.
|
|
This will hopefully help people with their first steps in Rust.
Fixes #16143.
/cc @jvns
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, @Ap0ph1s.
|
|
Thank you, @Ap0ph1s.
|
|
These should be properly annotated instead.
Fixes #16219.
|
|
In US english, "that" is used in restrictive clauses in place of
"which", and often affects the meaning of sentences.
In UK english and many dialects, no distinction is
made.
While Rust devs want to avoid unproductive pedanticism, it is worth at
least being uniform in documentation such as:
http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/index.html
and also in cases where correct usage of US english clarifies the
sentence.
|
|
cc @steveklabnick
|
|
This will hopefully help people with their first steps in Rust.
Fixes #16143.
|
|
These should be properly annotated instead.
Fixes #16219.
|
|
|
|
Closes #19556.
|
|
Fixes #19599
|
|
There was a link to a non existing guide
|
|
Closes #19556.
|
|
Fixes #19599
|
|
|
|
Fixes #19402.
|
|
Fixes #19335. (or at least, the actionable parts)
|
|
Using `and` here instead of `but` sounds better to me, as but makes it sound like an item which is still under active development shouldn't normally require more testing, but this one does - or something like that :-)
@steveklabnik?
|
|
Fixes #19402.
|
|
Fixes #19335.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- `s/(left|right) hand/\1-hand/`
- `s/parenthesis/parentheses/`
- `s/unicode/Unicode/`
- `s/validly-encoded/validly encoded/`
|
|
Fixes #18844
|
|
|
|
Fixes #19178
|
|
- `s/(left|right) hand/\1-hand/`
- `s/parenthesis/parentheses/`
- `s/unicode/Unicode/`
- `s/validly-encoded/validly encoded/`
|
|
Fixes #18844
|
|
Fixes #19177.
|
|
Fixes #19178
|
|
Fixes #19199
|
|
The reason given didn't make any sense when I read it when reading through the docs. I think this is more clear. Please let me know it is also more correct.
|
|
|
|
As-is, there's no indication that the code examples pop out into a window that runs on `play.rust-lang.org` until you mouse over them. I managed to get to section 4 of the guide before realizing you could do this since it didn't occur to me to mouse over the example text.
cc @rose since we went through the tutorial together and I think it wasn't obvious to her either.
|
|
This breaks code that referred to variant names in the same namespace as
their enum. Reexport the variants in the old location or alter code to
refer to the new locations:
```
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = A;
}
```
=>
```
pub use self::Foo::{A, B};
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = A;
}
```
or
```
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = Foo::A;
}
```
[breaking-change]
|
|
examples.
|
