| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
The definition of this value recently changed slightly. It no
longer corresponds directly to the target triple.
Also shuffled things around to make the order of cfg descriptions more
logical and added text related them to the target triple.
cc #33403
|
|
Document heap allocation location guarantee
```
14:25 < aidanhs> is there any guarantee that boxes will not move the value on the heap when they are moved?
14:26 <@steveklabnik> aidanhs: ... i'm not sure if it's a guarantee, but it follows, generally
14:26 <@steveklabnik> aidanhs: moves mean memcpy, so you're memcpying the structure of the box itself, which is copying the pointer
14:26 <@steveklabnik> so the pointer won't be updated
14:26 <@steveklabnik> moves cannot do complex things like move the memory around on the heap
14:26 <@kmc> aidanhs: I would say it's guaranteed
14:27 < aidanhs> steveklabnik: yeah, that's what I was thinking, it'd be pretty strange for rust to do something, but I couldn't find any docs one way or the other
14:27 <@steveklabnik> kmc: aidanhs yeah, it's like a borderline thing that we don't explicitly guanratee but i think IS guaranteed by our other guarantees
14:27 <@steveklabnik> mostly that move == memcpy
14:28 < aidanhs> kmc: steveklabnik great thanks! would a PR to the rust reference along these lines be ok?
14:28 < jmesmon> aidanhs: I believe owning_ref has some discussion of that (stable references)
14:29 <@steveklabnik> aidanhs: i would probably take that, yeah
14:29 < aidanhs> jmesmon: thanks, I'll take a look at that
```
https://botbot.me/mozilla/rust/2016-02-22/?msg=60657619&page=18
r? @steveklabnik
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add other primitive types to the reference
Fixes #31628
|
|
Fixes #31628
|
|
reference.md: clarify the limitation of type alias on an enum
Tentatively define the current behavior as the specification.
Cf. rust-lang/rust#26264, rust-lang/rust#28556, rust-lang/rust#30936
|
|
Clarify the semantics of enum discriminants
cf. https://doc.rust-lang.org/error-index.html#E0082
> The default type for enum discriminants is isize, but it can be adjusted by adding the repr attribute to the enum declaration.
It would be great if anyone could check my English.
|
|
Cf. rust-lang/rust#26264
Signed-off-by: NODA, Kai <nodakai@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: NODA, Kai <nodakai@gmail.com>
|
|
cf. https://doc.rust-lang.org/error-index.html#E0082
|
|
This PR implements [RFC 1192](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1192-inclusive-ranges.md), which is triple-dot syntax for inclusive range expressions. The new stuff is behind two feature gates (one for the syntax and one for the std::ops types). This replaces the deprecated functionality in std::iter. Along the way I simplified the desugaring for all ranges.
This is my first contribution to rust which changes more than one character outside of a test or comment, so please review carefully! Some of the individual commit messages have more of my notes. Also thanks for putting up with my dumb questions in #rust-internals.
- For implementing `std::ops::RangeInclusive`, I took @Stebalien's suggestion from https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1192#issuecomment-137864421. It seemed to me to make the implementation easier and increase type safety. If that stands, the RFC should be amended to avoid confusion.
- I also kind of like @glaebhoerl's [idea](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1254#issuecomment-147815299), which is unified inclusive/exclusive range syntax something like `x>..=y`. We can experiment with this while everything is behind a feature gate.
- There are a couple of FIXMEs left (see the last commit). I didn't know what to do about `RangeArgument` and I haven't added `Index` impls yet. Those should be discussed/finished before merging.
cc @Gankro since you [complained](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/3xkfro/what_happened_to_inclusive_ranges/cy5j0yq)
cc #27777 #30877 rust-lang/rust#1192 rust-lang/rfcs#1254
relevant to #28237 (tracking issue)
|
|
This commit is the result of the FCPs ending for the 1.8 release cycle for both
the libs and the lang suteams. The full list of changes are:
Stabilized
* `braced_empty_structs`
* `augmented_assignments`
* `str::encode_utf16` - renamed from `utf16_units`
* `str::EncodeUtf16` - renamed from `Utf16Units`
* `Ref::map`
* `RefMut::map`
* `ptr::drop_in_place`
* `time::Instant`
* `time::SystemTime`
* `{Instant,SystemTime}::now`
* `{Instant,SystemTime}::duration_since` - renamed from `duration_from_earlier`
* `{Instant,SystemTime}::elapsed`
* Various `Add`/`Sub` impls for `Time` and `SystemTime`
* `SystemTimeError`
* `SystemTimeError::duration`
* Various impls for `SystemTimeError`
* `UNIX_EPOCH`
* `ops::{Add,Sub,Mul,Div,Rem,BitAnd,BitOr,BitXor,Shl,Shr}Assign`
Deprecated
* Scoped TLS (the `scoped_thread_local!` macro)
* `Ref::filter_map`
* `RefMut::filter_map`
* `RwLockReadGuard::map`
* `RwLockWriteGuard::map`
* `Condvar::wait_timeout_with`
Closes #27714
Closes #27715
Closes #27746
Closes #27748
Closes #27908
Closes #29866
|
|
|
|
|
|
`continue` expression's description mentioned `break` instead of `continue`
|
|
`continue` expression's description mentioned `break` instead of `continue`
Signed-off-by: benaryorg <binary@benary.org>
|
|
It appears in the examples, but is not covered by any of the cases
in the prose description.
|
|
|
|
Reference implied that use declarations may appear *only* at the top of blocks and modules, but it is not the case, and the following is valid:
```Rust
fn foo() {
let x = 92;
use baz::bar;
}
```
r? @steveklabnik
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently the `mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu` target doesn't actually set the
`target_arch` value to `mipsel` but it rather uses `mips`. Alternatively the
`powerpc64le` target does indeed set the `target_arch` as `powerpc64le`,
causing a bit of inconsistency between theset two.
As these are just the same instance of one instruction set, let's use
`target_endian` to switch between them and only set the `target_arch` as one
value. This should cut down on the number of `#[cfg]` annotations necessary and
all around be a little more ergonomic.
|
|
Block comments don't have to be in the format `/*! ... !*/`
in order to be read as doc comments about the parent block.
The format `/*! ... */` is enough.
|
|
Block comments don't have to be in the format `/*! ... !*/`
in order to be read as doc comments about the parent block.
The format `/*! ... */` is enough.
|
|
The missing_docs lint only applies to public items in public modules, so this
example code did not actually generate any warnings or errors.
|
|
Add support to use functions exported using vectorcall.
This essentially only allows to pass a new LLVM calling convention
from rust to LLVM.
```rust
extern "vectorcall" fn abc(param: c_void);
```
references
----
http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/CallingConv_8h_source.html
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn375768.aspx
|
|
This adds support for big endian and little endian PowerPC64.
make check runs clean apart from one big endian backtrace issue.
|
|
|
|
This adds support for big endian and little endian PowerPC64.
make check runs clean apart from one big endian backtrace issue.
|
|
|
|
Rust differs in that behavior from C: In C, the newline escapes are resolved
before anything else, and in Rust this depends on whether the backslash is
escaped itself.
A difference can be observed in the following two programs:
```c
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
printf("\\
n\n");
return 0;
}
```
```rust
fn main() {
println!("\\
n");
}
```
The first program prints two newlines, the second one prints a backslash, a
newline, the latin character n and a final newline.
|
|
This PR is a rebase of the original PR by @eddyb https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/21836 with some unrebasable parts manually reapplied, feature gate added + type equality restriction added as described below.
This implementation is partial because the type equality restriction is applied to all type ascription expressions and not only those in lvalue contexts. Thus, all difficulties with detection of these contexts and translation of coercions having effect in runtime are avoided.
So, you can't write things with coercions like `let slice = &[1, 2, 3]: &[u8];`. It obviously makes type ascription less useful than it should be, but it's still much more useful than not having type ascription at all.
In particular, things like `let v = something.iter().collect(): Vec<_>;` and `let u = t.into(): U;` work as expected and I'm pretty happy with these improvements alone.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/23416
|
|
+ Rebase fixes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make clear that `super` may be included in the path several times.
r? @steveklabnik
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`unit` was in code formatting, which is wrong, since it's not actual code. The correct code is `()`.
|
