| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
Stabilize `..` in tuple (struct) patterns
I'd like to nominate `..` in tuple and tuple struct patterns for stabilization.
This feature is a relatively small extension to existing stable functionality and doesn't have known blockers.
The feature first appeared in Rust 1.10 6 months ago.
An example of use: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/36203
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33627
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
Add example using Self to reference
When I first came across `Self` I had a hard time finding references to it in the docs (and it's also been asked about on [StackOverflow](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32304595/whats-the-difference-between-self-and-self).
I hope this example provides someone who comes across it for the first time a little more help. If there is a better way to show an example actually using `Self`, I'm happy to modify this. It was just the simplest place to start I could see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prohibit patterns in trait methods without bodies
They are not properly type checked
```rust
trait Tr {
fn f(&a: u8); // <- This compiles
}
```
, mostly rejected by the parser already and generally don't make much sense.
This PR is kind of a missing part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/35015.
Given the [statistics from crater](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37378#issuecomment-256154994), the effect of this PR is mostly equivalent to improving `unused_mut` lint.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35078#issuecomment-255707355 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/35015 https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1685 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35203
r? @eddyb
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that attributes on expressions are still unstable and are behind the `stmt_expr_attributes` flag.
cc [Tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15701)
|
|
reference: use ticks instead of quotes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #36859
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add `must_use` to the Reference
I'm a bit uncertain about the exact phrasing, but having it mentioned at all is probably better than before.
|
|
and add the feature(abi_sysv64) to the list of known features
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add the unstable `:` colon and `<-` inplace operators.
|
|
|
|
Fix ABI string docs in reference.md
|
|
Add mention to RFC 940 in the Rust Reference.
This PR adds a mention to hyphens in Cargo package names being replaced by underscores when used as a crate, as per [RFC 940](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0940-hyphens-considered-harmful.md)
It also formats the RFCs consistently as RFC XXX instead of RFCXXX.
|
|
Update on struct expressions
Update doc for struct expressions (#32769)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The definition of this value recently changed slightly. It no
longer corresponds directly to the target triple.
Also shuffled things around to make the order of cfg descriptions more
logical and added text related them to the target triple.
cc #33403
|
|
|
|
- It also keeps mentions to RFCs consistent with the format "RFC XXX"
|
|
Document heap allocation location guarantee
```
14:25 < aidanhs> is there any guarantee that boxes will not move the value on the heap when they are moved?
14:26 <@steveklabnik> aidanhs: ... i'm not sure if it's a guarantee, but it follows, generally
14:26 <@steveklabnik> aidanhs: moves mean memcpy, so you're memcpying the structure of the box itself, which is copying the pointer
14:26 <@steveklabnik> so the pointer won't be updated
14:26 <@steveklabnik> moves cannot do complex things like move the memory around on the heap
14:26 <@kmc> aidanhs: I would say it's guaranteed
14:27 < aidanhs> steveklabnik: yeah, that's what I was thinking, it'd be pretty strange for rust to do something, but I couldn't find any docs one way or the other
14:27 <@steveklabnik> kmc: aidanhs yeah, it's like a borderline thing that we don't explicitly guanratee but i think IS guaranteed by our other guarantees
14:27 <@steveklabnik> mostly that move == memcpy
14:28 < aidanhs> kmc: steveklabnik great thanks! would a PR to the rust reference along these lines be ok?
14:28 < jmesmon> aidanhs: I believe owning_ref has some discussion of that (stable references)
14:29 <@steveklabnik> aidanhs: i would probably take that, yeah
14:29 < aidanhs> jmesmon: thanks, I'll take a look at that
```
https://botbot.me/mozilla/rust/2016-02-22/?msg=60657619&page=18
r? @steveklabnik
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add other primitive types to the reference
Fixes #31628
|
|
Fixes #31628
|
|
reference.md: clarify the limitation of type alias on an enum
Tentatively define the current behavior as the specification.
Cf. rust-lang/rust#26264, rust-lang/rust#28556, rust-lang/rust#30936
|
|
Clarify the semantics of enum discriminants
cf. https://doc.rust-lang.org/error-index.html#E0082
> The default type for enum discriminants is isize, but it can be adjusted by adding the repr attribute to the enum declaration.
It would be great if anyone could check my English.
|
|
Cf. rust-lang/rust#26264
Signed-off-by: NODA, Kai <nodakai@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: NODA, Kai <nodakai@gmail.com>
|
|
cf. https://doc.rust-lang.org/error-index.html#E0082
|
|
This PR implements [RFC 1192](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1192-inclusive-ranges.md), which is triple-dot syntax for inclusive range expressions. The new stuff is behind two feature gates (one for the syntax and one for the std::ops types). This replaces the deprecated functionality in std::iter. Along the way I simplified the desugaring for all ranges.
This is my first contribution to rust which changes more than one character outside of a test or comment, so please review carefully! Some of the individual commit messages have more of my notes. Also thanks for putting up with my dumb questions in #rust-internals.
- For implementing `std::ops::RangeInclusive`, I took @Stebalien's suggestion from https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1192#issuecomment-137864421. It seemed to me to make the implementation easier and increase type safety. If that stands, the RFC should be amended to avoid confusion.
- I also kind of like @glaebhoerl's [idea](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1254#issuecomment-147815299), which is unified inclusive/exclusive range syntax something like `x>..=y`. We can experiment with this while everything is behind a feature gate.
- There are a couple of FIXMEs left (see the last commit). I didn't know what to do about `RangeArgument` and I haven't added `Index` impls yet. Those should be discussed/finished before merging.
cc @Gankro since you [complained](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/3xkfro/what_happened_to_inclusive_ranges/cy5j0yq)
cc #27777 #30877 rust-lang/rust#1192 rust-lang/rfcs#1254
relevant to #28237 (tracking issue)
|
|
This commit is the result of the FCPs ending for the 1.8 release cycle for both
the libs and the lang suteams. The full list of changes are:
Stabilized
* `braced_empty_structs`
* `augmented_assignments`
* `str::encode_utf16` - renamed from `utf16_units`
* `str::EncodeUtf16` - renamed from `Utf16Units`
* `Ref::map`
* `RefMut::map`
* `ptr::drop_in_place`
* `time::Instant`
* `time::SystemTime`
* `{Instant,SystemTime}::now`
* `{Instant,SystemTime}::duration_since` - renamed from `duration_from_earlier`
* `{Instant,SystemTime}::elapsed`
* Various `Add`/`Sub` impls for `Time` and `SystemTime`
* `SystemTimeError`
* `SystemTimeError::duration`
* Various impls for `SystemTimeError`
* `UNIX_EPOCH`
* `ops::{Add,Sub,Mul,Div,Rem,BitAnd,BitOr,BitXor,Shl,Shr}Assign`
Deprecated
* Scoped TLS (the `scoped_thread_local!` macro)
* `Ref::filter_map`
* `RefMut::filter_map`
* `RwLockReadGuard::map`
* `RwLockWriteGuard::map`
* `Condvar::wait_timeout_with`
Closes #27714
Closes #27715
Closes #27746
Closes #27748
Closes #27908
Closes #29866
|
|
|
|
|