| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Also removes redundant newline in code block.
|
|
Here's the issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15333
Tested it. It works. FYI, in case anyone doesn't know: keyboard shortcut `'` restricts text search to only links on Firefox allowing this to be checked easily.
|
|
The specialization logic for patterns is really the same in both
exhaustiveness/reachability checking and codegen.
|
|
|
|
floating point numbers for real.
This will break code that looks like:
let mut x = 0;
while ... {
x += 1;
}
println!("{}", x);
Change that code to:
let mut x = 0i;
while ... {
x += 1;
}
println!("{}", x);
Closes #15201.
[breaking-change]
|
|
This change registers new snapshots, allowing `*T` to be removed from the language. This is a large breaking change, and it is recommended that if compiler errors are seen that any FFI calls are audited to determine whether they should be actually taking `*mut T`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: OGINO Masanori <masanori.ogino@gmail.com>
|
|
This breaks a fair amount of code. The typical patterns are:
* `for _ in range(0, 10)`: change to `for _ in range(0u, 10)`;
* `println!("{}", 3)`: change to `println!("{}", 3i)`;
* `[1, 2, 3].len()`: change to `[1i, 2, 3].len()`.
RFC #30. Closes #6023.
[breaking-change]
|
|
This does not yet change the compiler and libraries from `*T` to `*const T` as
it will require a snapshot to do so.
cc #7362
---
Note that the corresponding RFC, https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/68, has not yet been accepted. It was [discussed at the last meeting](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/wiki/Meeting-weekly-2014-06-10#rfc-pr-68-unsafe-pointers-rename-t-to-const-t) and decided to be accepted, however. I figured I'd get started on the preliminary work for the RFC that will be required regardless.
|
|
`for...in`.
Closes #14803.
If you used a structure literal after one of these keywords, surround it
in parentheses.
[breaking-change]
|
|
There were still Total{Ord,Eq} in docs and src/etc
|
|
This commit makes several changes to the stability index infrastructure:
* Stability levels are now inherited lexically, i.e., each item's
stability level becomes the default for any nested items.
* The computed stability level for an item is stored as part of the
metadata. When using an item from an external crate, this data is
looked up and cached.
* The stability lint works from the computed stability level, rather
than manual stability attribute annotations. However, the lint still
checks only a limited set of item uses (e.g., it does not check every
component of a path on import). This will be addressed in a later PR,
as part of issue #8962.
* The stability lint only applies to items originating from external
crates, since the stability index is intended as a promise to
downstream crates.
* The "experimental" lint is now _allow_ by default. This is because
almost all existing crates have been marked "experimental", pending
library stabilization. With inheritance in place, this would generate
a massive explosion of warnings for every Rust program.
The lint should be changed back to deny-by-default after library
stabilization is complete.
* The "deprecated" lint still warns by default.
The net result: we can begin tracking stability index for the standard
libraries as we stabilize, without impacting most clients.
Closes #13540.
|
|
Closes #8142.
This is not the semantics we want long-term. You can continue to use
`#[unsafe_destructor]`, but you'll need to add
`#![feature(unsafe_destructor)]` to the crate attributes.
[breaking-change]
|
|
This commit makes several changes to the stability index infrastructure:
* Stability levels are now inherited lexically, i.e., each item's
stability level becomes the default for any nested items.
* The computed stability level for an item is stored as part of the
metadata. When using an item from an external crate, this data is
looked up and cached.
* The stability lint works from the computed stability level, rather
than manual stability attribute annotations. However, the lint still
checks only a limited set of item uses (e.g., it does not check every
component of a path on import). This will be addressed in a later PR,
as part of issue #8962.
* The stability lint only applies to items originating from external
crates, since the stability index is intended as a promise to
downstream crates.
* The "experimental" lint is now _allow_ by default. This is because
almost all existing crates have been marked "experimental", pending
library stabilization. With inheritance in place, this would generate
a massive explosion of warnings for every Rust program.
The lint should be changed back to deny-by-default after library
stabilization is complete.
* The "deprecated" lint still warns by default.
The net result: we can begin tracking stability index for the standard
libraries as we stabilize, without impacting most clients.
Closes #13540.
|
|
Replace its usage with byte string literals, except in `bytes!()` tests.
Also add a new snapshot, to be able to use the new b"foo" syntax.
The src/etc/2014-06-rewrite-bytes-macros.py script automatically
rewrites `bytes!()` invocations into byte string literals.
Pass it filenames as arguments to generate a diff that you can inspect,
or `--apply` followed by filenames to apply the changes in place.
Diffs can be piped into `tip` or `pygmentize -l diff` for coloring.
|
|
See #14646 (tracking issue) and rust-lang/rfcs#69.
This does not close the tracking issue, as the `bytes!()` macro still needs to be removed. It will be later, after a snapshot is made with the changes in this PR, so that the new syntax can be used when bootstrapping the compiler.
|
|
|
|
`#[inline(never)]` is used.
Closes #8958.
This can break some code that relied on the addresses of statics
being distinct; add `#[inline(never)]` to the affected statics.
[breaking-change]
|
|
This does not yet change the compiler and libraries from `*T` to `*const T` as
it will require a snapshot to do so.
cc #7362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These were only used for the markdown tests, and there's no reason they should
be distinct from the other tests.
|
|
Also updated/corrected a few other details in the tuple and struct sections.
|
|
|
|
Also updated/corrected a few other details in the tuple and struct sections.
|
|
Now that rustdoc understands proper language tags
as the code not being Rust, we can tag everything
properly. `norust` as a negative statement is a bad
tag.
This change tags examples in other languages by
their language. Plain notations are marked as `text`.
Console examples are marked as `console`.
Also fix markdown.rs to not highlight non-rust code.
Amends the documentation to reflect the new
behaviour.
|
|
|
|
Now that rustdoc understands proper language tags
as the code not being Rust, we can tag everything
properly.
This change tags examples in other languages by
their language. Plain notations are marked as `text`.
Console examples are marked as `console`.
Also fix markdown.rs to not highlight non-rust code.
|
|
I removed all remaining deprecated owned vectors from the docs. All example tests pass.
|
|
|
|
This is part of the ongoing renaming of the equality traits. See #12517 for more
details. All code using Eq/Ord will temporarily need to move to Partial{Eq,Ord}
or the Total{Eq,Ord} traits. The Total traits will soon be renamed to {Eq,Ord}.
cc #12517
[breaking-change]
|
|
According to the corresponding section, accessing a mutable static variable requires `unsafe` too, and I believe it counts as as language level feature. Add it to the relevant list in the Unsafety section.
|
|
|
|
According to the corresponding section, accessing a mutable static variable requires `unsafe` too, and I believe it counts as as language level feature. Add it to the relevant list in the Unsafety section.
|
|
|
|
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
[breaking-change]
|
|
There's a fair number of attributes that have to be whitelisted since
they're either looked for by rustdoc, in trans, or as needed. These can
be cleaned up in the future.
|
|
The grammar for use declarations was outdated. Corrected some other mistakes.
|
|
The grammar for use declarations was outdated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The core library in theory has 0 dependencies, but in practice it has some in
order for it to be efficient. These dependencies are in the form of the basic
memory operations provided by libc traditionally, such as memset, memcmp, etc.
These functions are trivial to implement and themselves have 0 dependencies.
This commit adds a new crate, librlibc, which will serve the purpose of
providing these dependencies. The crate is never linked to by default, but is
available to be linked to by downstream consumers. Normally these functions are
provided by the system libc, but in other freestanding contexts a libc may not
be available. In these cases, librlibc will suffice for enabling execution with
libcore.
cc #10116
|
|
|
|
After allowing mixing rlibs and dylibs in #13892, the documentation was not
updated accordingly to reflect this new capability.
|
|
Keyword for continue expressions was changed from loop to continue, but the
manual was not updated.
|
