| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They are internal tools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The specific reason I decided to update is since newer versions of
chrono don't depend on time 0.1, which has some soundness issues.
Of course, staying up-to-date in general is a good idea.
|
|
They currently also point to filenames, which is redundant.
current
- [ ] thir.md
- [ ] line 7: 2022-04
- [ ] line 60: 2022-08
- [ ] traits/chalk.md
- [ ] line 4: 2022-05
proposed
- thir.md
- [ ] line 7: 2022-04
- [ ] line 60: 2022-08
- traits/chalk.md
- [ ] line 4: 2022-05
|
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1428#discussion_r948143840
|
|
One could not run it like the following, for the would be a panic:
cargo run --manifest-path ci/date-check/Cargo.toml .
Also, remove the need to specify argument, in which case, current_dir
is assumed.
|
|
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
* make date-check lightweight
This avoids having to write the date twice when updating date-check.
Before "As of <-- 2022-07 --> July 2022"
After "As of July 2022"
* please clippy
* update date-check docs
* accept review suggestion
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#pullrequestreview-1042163557
* accept review suggestion
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#pullrequestreview-1042167261
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#issuecomment-1189105017
* this breaks markdown
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#discussion_r934018268
This led to a more robust regex, though making the tool more picky.
It also found a wrong date format that was missed.
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#discussion_r934018419
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#discussion_r934018816
* accept review suggestion
This was reverted by mistake
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#discussion_r934019395
* use a more simple fn
* address review comment
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1394#discussion_r934018981
Much more clean
* nit
* accept review suggestion
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
* avoid a failed regex
Also, test new shape
* adjust to new regex (which uses named groups)
New regex was introduced by 456008cc35de0597d26fec0030ee5db8a0c2fb65
Co-authored-by: Noah Lev <camelidcamel@gmail.com>
|
|
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
No migrations were necessary.
|
|
Now, if people use 'Date' instead of 'date', it won't be ignored.
|
|
This tool looks for HTML comments like `<!-- date: 2021-01 -->` in each
Markdown source file and compiles a list of dates that are older than
six months. It then opens an issue with that list, with checkboxes for
each file and date. Note that it will only open an issue if there was at
least one date older than six months; it does nothing if the list is
empty.
This tool is automatically run monthly in a GitHub Actions workflow.
I have tested the tool on a private repo and confirmed that it works.
|