| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Fix small typo in check-cfg.md
|
|
Update the arm-* and aarch64-* platform docs.
This PR updates some of the arm*-unknown-none target docs, and adds some missing target pages.
## aarch64-none-elf and aarch64-none-elf-softfloat
The Rust Embedded Devices Working Group's Arm Team is added as a maintainer, and a target page is added. Links are added to the EDWG's support crates for this target.
## armv7a-none-eabi and armv7a-none-eabihf
The Rust Embedded Devices Working Group's Arm Team is added as a maintainer, and a target page is added. Links are added to the EDWG's support crates for this target.
## armv7r-none-eabi and armv7r-none-eabihf
The Rust Embedded Devices Working Group's Arm Team is added as a maintainer, and the target page is split from the Big Endian versions. Links are added to the EDWG's support crates for this target.
## armebv7r-none-eabi and armveb7r-none-eabihf
The target page is split from the Little Endian versions. No change in maintainers.
I have agreement to add EDWG/T-Arm as maintainers, which was voted upon in [their repo](https://github.com/rust-embedded/wg/issues/851).
|
|
This is important to note, as it affects how easy it is to build a
binary, and that `#![no_std]` is mandatory.
A different PR should probably add this to all the other platform pages.
|
|
|
|
Removes a bunch of information that isn't, strictly speaking, target specific.
|
|
targets
|
|
This schema is helpful for people writing custom target spec JSON. It
can provide autocomplete in the editor, and also serves as documentation
when there are documentation comments on the structs, as `schemars` will
put them in the schema.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From https://github.com/thejpster/rust/pull/1.
|
|
The Rust Embedded Devices Working Group (wg-embedded) Arm Team (t-arm)
agreed to listed as maintainers of:
* aarch64-unknown-none
* aarch64-unknown-none-softfloat
* armv7a-none-eabi
* armv7r-none-eabi
* armv7r-none-eabihf
The aarch64-unknown-none* target didn't have a page so I added it.
wg-embedded t-arm did not want to take over:
* armebv7r-none-eabi
* armebv7r-none-eabihf
So I gave them their own target page. The current maintainer remains.
|
|
This patch defines minimum CPU feature requirements, updates toolchain
baseline, and streamlines maintainer list:
- Specify double-precision floating-point and LSX as mandatory CPU features
- Raise the minimum required binutils version to 2.42+, due to relocations
introduced by the default medium code model
- Remove outdated maintainers to reduce irrelevant notifications
|
|
Promote aarch64-pc-windows-msvc to Tier 1
Per <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3817>
Tracking issue: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145671>
|
|
don't uppercase error messages
|
|
a more general version of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146080.
after a bit of hacking in [`fluent.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_fluent_macro/src/fluent.rs), i discovered that i'm not the only one that is bad at following guidelines :sweat_smile:. this pr lowercases the first letter of all the error messages in the codebase.
(i did not change things that are traditionally uppercased such as _MIR_, _ABI_ or _C_)
i think it's reasonable to run a `@bors try` so all the test suite is checked, as i cannot run some of the tests on my machine. i double checked (and replaced manually) all the old error messages, but better be safe than sorry.
in the future i will try to add a check in `x test tidy` that errors if an error message starts with an uppercase letter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move `riscv64-gc-unknown-linux-musl` from Tier 2 with Host tools to Tier 2
It is not shipped with host tools, so it was located in the wrong group. The musl target is [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/467c89cd0b1c579edc247808c35941677918d29d/src/ci/docker/host-x86_64/dist-various-2/Dockerfile#L126) - no host tools.
Noticed in https://github.com/rust-lang/docker-rust/pull/247.
|
|
platform-support: Fix LoongArch32 host column
|
|
It is not shipped with host tools, so it was located in the wrong group.
|
|
|
|
Losslessly optimize PNG files
Losslessly optimizes all of the PNG files in the repo. Done with:
```
oxipng -o max -a -s
oxipng -o max --zopfli -a -s
```
|
|
r=davidtwco
Add new Tier-3 target: riscv64a23-unknown-linux-gnu
MCP: [Tier 3 target proposal: riscv64a23-unknown-linux-gnu](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/894)
Changes:
- add new target: riscv64a23-unknown-linux-gnu
- add target page
|
|
Add aarch64_be-unknown-linux-musl target
This PR adds a target definition for big-endian Aarch64 with musl-libc.
cc `@Gelbpunkt`
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: houpo-bob <houpocun@outlook.com>
|
|
Add aarch64_be-unknown-hermit target
Follow-up to rust-lang/rust#144962, which added the target necessary to build the Hermit bootloader and kernel for `aarch64_be`. This adds the target for Rust applications that can run in Hermit.
I've been testing this for a while now and `@mkroening` and `@stlankes` are on board with adding this target.
About the [tier 3 target policy](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/target-tier-policy.html#tier-3-target-policy):
> - A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
The maintainers for this target are the same as for the other Hermit targets, `@mkroening` and `@stlankes.`
> - Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
> - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
> - If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
The target name is consistent with the existing `aarch64-unknown-hermit` target and the existing big endian aarch64 targets like `aarch64_be-unknown-linux-gnu`.
> - Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
> - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
> - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
> - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
> - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
There are no licensing issues or proprietary components required to compile for this target.
> - Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
> - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Ack.
> - Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
This target implements std with the same featureset as `aarch64-unknown-hermit`.
> - The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Ack, that is part of the markdown document.
> - Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
> - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
Ack.
> - Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
> - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
This doesn't break any existing targets.
> - Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)
The LLVM backend works.
> - If a tier 3 target stops meeting these requirements, or the target maintainers no longer have interest or time, or the target shows no signs of activity and has not built for some time, or removing the target would improve the quality of the Rust codebase, we may post a PR to remove it; any such PR will be CCed to the target maintainers (and potentially other people who have previously worked on the target), to check potential interest in improving the situation.
Ack.
r? compiler_leads
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jens Reidel <adrian@travitia.xyz>
|
|
Signed-off-by: xihuwenhua <xihuwenhua@outlook.com>
|
|
|
|
Losslessly optimizes all of the PNG files in the repo. Done with:
```
oxipng -o max -a -s
oxipng -o max --zopfli -a -s
```
|
|
r=Kobzol,madsmtm
Demote x86_64-apple-darwin to Tier 2 with host tools
Switch to only using aarch64 runners (implying we are now cross-compiling) and stop running tests. In the future, we could enable (some?) tests via Rosetta 2.
This implements the decision from https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3841.
|
|
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#145538 (bufreader::Buffer::backshift: don't move the uninit bytes)
- rust-lang/rust#145542 (triagebot: Don't warn no-mentions on subtree updates)
- rust-lang/rust#145549 (Update rust maintainers in openharmony.md)
- rust-lang/rust#145550 (Avoid using `()` in `derive(From)` output.)
- rust-lang/rust#145556 (Allow stability attributes on extern crates)
- rust-lang/rust#145560 (Remove unused `PartialOrd`/`Ord` from bootstrap)
- rust-lang/rust#145568 (ignore frontmatters in `TokenStream::new`)
- rust-lang/rust#145571 (remove myself from some adhoc-groups and pings)
- rust-lang/rust#145576 (Add change tracker entry for `--timings`)
- rust-lang/rust#145578 (Add VEXos "linked files" support to `armv7a-vex-v5`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Rollup of 15 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#145338 (actually provide the correct args to coroutine witnesses)
- rust-lang/rust#145429 (Couple of codegen_fn_attrs improvements)
- rust-lang/rust#145452 (Do not strip binaries in bootstrap everytime if they are unchanged)
- rust-lang/rust#145464 (Stabilize `const_pathbuf_osstring_new` feature)
- rust-lang/rust#145474 (Properly recover from parenthesized use-bounds (precise capturing lists) plus small cleanups)
- rust-lang/rust#145486 (Fix `unicode_data.rs` mention message)
- rust-lang/rust#145490 (Trace some basic I/O operations in bootstrap)
- rust-lang/rust#145493 (remove `should_render` in `PrintAttribute` derive)
- rust-lang/rust#145500 (Port must_use to the new target checking)
- rust-lang/rust#145505 (Simplify span caches)
- rust-lang/rust#145510 (Visit and print async_fut local for async drop.)
- rust-lang/rust#145511 (Rust build fails on OpenBSD after using file_lock feature)
- rust-lang/rust#145532 (resolve: debug for block module)
- rust-lang/rust#145533 (Reorder `lto` options from most to least optimizing)
- rust-lang/rust#145537 (Do not consider a `T: !Sized` candidate to satisfy a `T: !MetaSized` obligation.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Require approval from t-infra instead of t-release on tier bumps
Discussed at https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Tier.201.20target.20promotion.20RFC.20FCP.20sign-offs/with/532735844.
I also changed "viability and value" to just "viability". I think that t-infra should decide whether it's viable to support a given target on our CI. The value should be determined by t-compiler.
r? ``@jieyouxu``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Switch to only using aarch64 runners (implying we are now
cross-compiling) and stop running tests. In the future, we could
enable (some?) tests via Rosetta 2.
|
|
Improve `--remap-path-prefix` documentation
This PR improves the `--remap-path-prefix` documentation by:
- moving it into it's own page
- adding a small example
- mentioning that the remapping is best effort[^1]
- mentioning `link.exe`/PDB issues[^2]
- mentioning the path separator issue (textual replacement)
r? ``@wesleywiser``
[^1]: [#t-compiler > link.exe leaking paths in Windows PDB @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/link.2Eexe.20leaking.20paths.20in.20Windows.20PDB/near/523343774)
[^2]: [#t-compiler > link.exe leaking paths in Windows PDB @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/link.2Eexe.20leaking.20paths.20in.20Windows.20PDB/near/523331762)
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Weihang Lo <me@weihanglo.tw>
Co-Authored-By: Wesley Wiser <wwiser@gmail.com>
|
|
r=davidtwco
Add aarch64_be-unknown-none-softfloat target
This adds a new target for bare-metal big endian ARM64 without FPU. We want to use this in [the Hermit unikernel](https://github.com/hermit-os/kernel) because big endian ARM64 is the most accessible big endian architecture for us and it can be supported with our existing aarch64 code. I have compiled our kernel and bootloader with this target and they work as expected in QEMU.
Regarding the [tier 3 target policy](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/target-tier-policy.html#tier-3-target-policy):
> - A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
The maintainer(s) (currently just me) are listed in the markdown document that documents the target.
> - Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
> - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
> - If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
The target name is consistent with the existing `aarch64-unknown-none-softfloat` target and the existing big endian aarch64 targets like `aarch64_be-unknown-linux-gnu`.
> - Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
> - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
> - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
> - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
> - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
There are no licensing issues and any toolchain that can compile for `aarch64-unknown-none-softfloat` can also compile for `aarch64_be-unknown-none-softfloat` (well, at least GCC and LLVM). No proprietary components are required.
> - Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
> - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Ack.
> - Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
This target does not implement std and is equivalent to `aarch64-unknown-none-softfloat` in all these regards.
> - The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Ack, that is part of the markdown document.
> - Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via ```@)``` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
> - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
Ack.
> - Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
> - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
This doesn't break any existing targets.
> - Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)
The LLVM backend works.
> - If a tier 3 target stops meeting these requirements, or the target maintainers no longer have interest or time, or the target shows no signs of activity and has not built for some time, or removing the target would improve the quality of the Rust codebase, we may post a PR to remove it; any such PR will be CCed to the target maintainers (and potentially other people who have previously worked on the target), to check potential interest in improving the situation.
Ack.
|
|
Deprecate RUST_TEST_* env variables
Like with rust-lang/rust#139224, this is a documentation-only deprecation for now. Over time, we can
- warn and then remove on use of unstable environment variables
- warn on use of stable environment variables (no plan to remove due to compatibility)
Longer term, we expect test runners, like `cargo test`, to provide the necessary mechanisms for environmental or persistent configuration (e.g. using cargo config which supports `.cargo/config.toml` as well as environment variables).
This would include:
- `RUST_TEST_THREADS`
- `RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE`
- `RUST_TEST_SHUFFLE` (unstable)
- `RUST_TEST_SHUFFLE_SEED` (unstable)
The primary outcomes for this change are
- Reducing the scope of what is expected for custom test harnesses to implement
- Reduce the mechanisms that test runners, like `cargo test`, are expected to track when they are being bypassed to protect against negative interactions, e.g. `RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE=1` when json output is being read.
For testing-devex FCP, see rust-lang/testing-devex-team#10
Fixes rust-lang/testing-devex-team#10
History
-------
At each step, I could not find evidence of design discussions on whether to support CLI, env, or both. The first env variable seems to come from the fact that it was being forked out of an existing env variable that had a much wider scope.
At best, this seems like a way to offer a more persistent configuration for these flags but environment variables hidden away in libtest is a bit clunky and this seems like the wrong layer to handle this problem.
**Originally:** `RUST_THREADS` was respected by the Rust runtime and libextra/test got this for free
**2013:** rust-lang/rust#7335 suggested splitting `RUST_TEST_TASKS` out of `RUST_THREADS`. In that issue and the implementation (rust-lang/rust#8823).
**2014:** rust-lang/rust#13374 ask for support to disable capturing of stdout/stderr. `--nocapture` and `RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE` were added together.
**2015:** rust-lang/rust#23525 renamed `RUST_TEST_TASKS` to `RUST_TEST_THREADS`
**2016:** rust-lang/rust#25636 asked to configure `RUST_TEST_THREADS` via `--test-threads` which was implemented in rust-lang/rust#35414
**2021:** rust-lang/rust#85440 asked for test randomization which was implemented in rust-lang/rust#89082, adding `--shuffle` / RUST_TEST_SHUFFLE` and `--shuffle-seed SEED` / `RUST_TEST_SHUFFLE_SEED`
Potentially relevant issues
---------------------------
- rust-lang/rust#74845
|
|
Co-authored-by: zachs18 <8355914+zachs18@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
