| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Remove linuxkernel targets
These are not used by the actual Rust-for-Linux project, so they're mostly just confusing.
|
|
Promote {aarch64,i686,x86_64}-unknown-uefi to Tier 2
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/555
CC `@dvdhrm`
|
|
Update linker-plugin-lto.md to contain up to Rust 1.65
The table rows were obtained via the script embedded in the page.
|
|
The helper shell script has been rewritten as a helper Python script
that generates the range-based table.
|
|
These are not used by the actual Rust-for-Linux project, so they're mostly just confusing.
|
|
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/555
|
|
The table rows were obtained via the script embedded in the page.
|
|
|
|
Update note about unstable split-debuginfo flag.
split-debuginfo was effectively stabilized in #98051. The note about it requiring `-Z unstable-options` is no longer accurate.
The rules for when it is gated and when it is supported are somewhat complex. I considered removing the note entirely, or making it more generic, but opted to instead try to summarize the current state.
|
|
Add a tier 3 target for the Sony PlayStation 1
This adds a tier 3 target, `mipsel-sony-psx`, for the Sony PlayStation 1. I've tested it pretty thoroughly with [this SDK](https://github.com/ayrtonm/psx-sdk-rs) I wrote for it.
From the [tier 3 target policy](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/target-tier-policy.html#tier-3-target-policy) (I've omitted the subpoints for brevity, but read over everything)
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I'd be the designated developer
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
The target name follows the conventions of the existing PSP target (`mipsel-sony-psp`) and uses `psx` following the convention of the broader [PlayStation homebrew community](https://psx-spx.consoledev.net/).
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
No legal issues with this target.
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
:+1:
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
The psx supports `core` and `alloc`, but will likely not support `std` anytime soon.
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
This target has an SDK and a `cargo-psx` tool for formatting binaries as psx executables. Documentation and examples are provided in the [psx-sdk-rs README](https://github.com/ayrtonm/psx-sdk-rs#psx-sdk-rs), the SDK and cargo tool are both available through crates.io and docs.rs has [SDK documentation](https://docs.rs/psx/latest/psx/).
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
:+1:
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
No problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The compiler currently has `-Ztime` and `-Ztime-passes`. I've used
`-Ztime-passes` for years but only recently learned about `-Ztime`.
What's the difference? Let's look at the `-Zhelp` output:
```
-Z time=val -- measure time of rustc processes (default: no)
-Z time-passes=val -- measure time of each rustc pass (default: no)
```
The `-Ztime-passes` description is clear, but the `-Ztime` one is less so.
Sounds like it measures the time for the entire process?
No. The real difference is that `-Ztime-passes` prints out info about passes,
and `-Ztime` does the same, but only for a subset of those passes. More
specifically, there is a distinction in the profiling code between a "verbose
generic activity" and an "extra verbose generic activity". `-Ztime-passes`
prints both kinds, while `-Ztime` only prints the first one. (It took me
a close reading of the source code to determine this difference.)
In practice this distinction has low value. Perhaps in the past the "extra
verbose" output was more voluminous, but now that we only print stats for a
pass if it exceeds 5ms or alters the RSS, `-Ztime-passes` is less spammy. Also,
a lot of the "extra verbose" cases are for individual lint passes, and you need
to also use `-Zno-interleave-lints` to see those anyway.
Therefore, this commit removes `-Ztime` and the associated machinery. One thing
to note is that the existing "extra verbose" activities all have an extra
string argument, so the commit adds the ability to accept an extra argument to
the "verbose" activities.
|
|
The system GCC 5 in ubuntu:16.04 will be too old to compile LLVM 16, so
we need an upgrade. To avoid raising the minimum glibc requirements for
`i586-unknown-linux-gnu`, this target is converted to a crosstool-ng
toolchain, *relaxing* it to the same Linux 3.2 / glibc 2.17 minimum we
use elsewhere. The musl targets still use Ubuntu's system toolchain, but
this doesn't have the same compatibility concerns.
|
|
Document some missing command-line arguments
The rustc command-line arguments docs should document all of the stable arguments for rustc. Two were missing, `--force-warn` which was somewhat documented in the lint-levels chapter, but should also include a mention in the arguments list. `--diagnostic-width` was stabilized in #95635, but the docs weren't updated.
|
|
Add a platform support document for Android
r? ``@joshtriplett``
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add armv5te-none-eabi and thumbv5te-none-eabi targets
Creates two new Tier 3 targets, `armv5te-none-eabi` and `thumbv5te-none-eabi`. They are for the same target architecture (armv5te), but one defaults to the A32 instruction set and the other defaults to T32. Based on the existing `armv4t-none-eabi` and `thumbv4t-none-eabi` targets.
My particular use case for these targets is Nintendo DS homebrew, but they should be usable for any armv5te system.
Going through the Tier 3 target policy:
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
That will be me.
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets.
Naming is consistent with previous targets.
>> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility.
No ambiguity here.
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
Doesn't create any legal issues.
>> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
This doesn't introduce any new licenses.
>> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Yep.
>> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
No new license requirements.
>> Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries.
Everything this uses is FOSS, no proprietary required.
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
OK.
>> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
OK.
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
This is a bare-metal target with only support for `core` (and `alloc`, if the user provides an allocator).
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Documentation has been added.
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
OK.
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
OK.
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
This doesn't break any other targets.
>> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
No unnecessary unconditional features here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx platform
cc `@raoulstrackx` `@mzohreva`
|
|
Adding Fuchsia zxdb debugging walkthrough to docs
Adding `zxdb` docs to walkthrough to show debugging steps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add -api-level to pm command
As of ~Aug 30th, `pm build` commands require an `api-level` flag. This flag should match the fuchsia api-level that's being targeted by the code. Since this is dependent on the version of the SDK that's being used, we may want to change this to something a bit more robust in the future.
|
|
Co-authored-by: Andrew Pollack <andrewpkq@gmail.com>
|
|
ffx component run should provide a collection
In the future,`ffx component run` will not default to the using the `/core/ffx-laboratory` collection. Updated the run commands to include this.
|
|
In the future,`ffx component run` will not default to the using the `/core/ffx-laboratory` collection. Updated the run commands to include this.
|
|
As of ~Aug 30th, `pm build` commands require an `api-level` flag. This flag should match the fuchsia api-level that's being targeted by the code. Since this is dependent on the version of the SDK that's being used, we may want to change this to something a bit more robust in the future.
|
|
Fuchsia .manifest files do not support a `#` comment syntax. Because of this, if you copy and paste the current example code for this file, and then remove the line you don't need, you still see an error. To make this a bit easier to follow, split this into two code blocks, one for rustc, and one for cargo.
|
|
|
|
Fix filename of armv4t-none-eabi.md
The filename differed from the link in SUMMARY.md, causing it to 404.
|
|
Fixes/adjustments to Fuchsia doc walkthrough
Small fixes/adjustments missed during #100927
|
|
Fix bad target name in Walkthrough
Walkthrough currently say:
```
rustup target add aarch_64-fuchsia
```
but should say
```
rustup target add aarch64-fuchsia
```
|
|
The filename differed from the link in SUMMARY.md, causing it to 404.
|
|
Fix a bunch of typo
This PR will fix some typos detected by [typos].
I only picked the ones I was sure were spelling errors to fix, mostly in
the comments.
[typos]: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
|
|
|
|
Walkthrough currently say:
```
rustup target add aarch_64-fuchsia
```
but should say
```
rustup target add aarch64-fuchsia
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
This PR will fix some typos detected by [typos].
I only picked the ones I was sure were spelling errors to fix, mostly in
the comments.
[typos]: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
|
|
Add tier-3 support for powerpc64 and riscv64 openbsd
# powerpc64
- MCP for [powerpc64-unknown-openbsd tier-3 support](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/551)
- only need to add spec definition in rustc_target
# riscv64
- MCP for [riscv64-unknown-openbsd tier-3 support](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/552)
- add spec definition in rustc_target
- follow freebsd about avoiding linking with `libatomic`
|
|
Adding new Fuchsia rustup docs... reworking walkthrough
Docs improvements:
* Adding new `rustup` target add for Fuchsia targets
* Reworking walkthrough to show directory building as it happens
* Reworking walkthrough to use `hello_fuchsia_pkg/` directory
cc. `@djkoloski`
|
|
Co-authored-by: Tyler Mandry <tmandry@gmail.com>
|
