| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
for `~str`/`~[]`.
Note that `~self` still remains, since I forgot to add support for
`Box<self>` before the snapshot.
r? @brson or @alexcrichton or whoever
|
|
Lots of assorted things here and there, all the details are in the commits.
Closes #11712
|
|
for `~str`/`~[]`.
Note that `~self` still remains, since I forgot to add support for
`Box<self>` before the snapshot.
How to update your code:
* Instead of `~EXPR`, you should write `box EXPR`.
* Instead of `~TYPE`, you should write `Box<Type>`.
* Instead of `~PATTERN`, you should write `box PATTERN`.
[breaking-change]
|
|
Update the example to make the usage of `pub mod foo;` much more
apparent, as well as using an example where setting the visibility of
the module is actually necessary.
|
|
Corrected example to to use Rand trait referenced in preceding
description and included an example using the Show trait to print ABC.
|
|
|
|
Combined redundant paragraphs about the match expression and removed a
redundant example.
|
|
Version changed due to a newer requirement in LLVM.
|
|
Improve tutorial discussion of closures, e.g. with respect to type inference and variable capture.
Fix #13621
---- original description follows
I'd like this pulled to master if possible but if not I'd appreciate comments on what I need to change. I found the closures difficult to understand as they were so I tried to explain it so I would've had an easier time understanding it. I think it's better at least, somewhat.
I don't know that everyone liked the `-> ()` I included but I thought explicit is best to aid understanding. I thought it was much harder to understand than it should have been.
[EDIT] - Clicked too early.
This doesn't `make check` without errors on my Xubuntu on Virtualbox machine. Not sure why. I don't think I changed anything problematic. I'll try `make check` on master tomorrow.
Opened https://github.com/mozilla/rust/issues/13621 regarding this.
|
|
This primary fix brought on by this upgrade is the proper matching of the ```
and ~~~ doc blocks. This also moves hoedown to a git submodule rather than a
bundled repository.
Additionally, hoedown is stricter about code blocks, so this ended up fixing a
lot of invalid code blocks (ending with " ```" instead of "```", or ending with
"~~~~" instead of "~~~").
Closes #12776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most important: distinguish function decl sugar for omitting `-> ()`
from type inference on closures. I also tried to add a couple more
examples to further emphasize this distinction. Note that this sugar
(of omitting `-> ()`) is actually already briefly mentioned in an
earlier section, so it is a little tricky deciding whether to put more
material here, or to move it up to the previous section.
Other drive-by fixes:
* Fix the line length of the code blocks to fit in the width provided
in the rendered HTML
* Some minor revisions to wording (e.g. try to clarify in some cases
where a type mismatch is arising).
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Closes #13591. Relevant example: http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/struct.CChars.htm
(Had to use `!important` to override CSS selector precedence, namely matching over parent class.)
- Implement changes from #13780 feedback, namely:
* Changed font-size from 18px to 15px
* Reintroduced gray background for code samples
* Tightened up the margins
- Fix point 1 and point 4 of #13804.
Samples:
- [enum.FileType](http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/enum.FileType.htm)
- [struct.CChars](http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/struct.CChars.htm)
- [std](http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/std.htm)
- [std::io](http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/io.htm).
r? @brson
|
|
As of cc6ec8df, the Owned closures example uses println! instead of
debug!, making a note about seeing debug seem out-of-place in this
section.
Since debug! is not used elsewhere in the tutorial, remove the note
entirely.
|
|
|
|
Replaced "len" by "length", to match the given code example.
|
|
This pr updates the "Additional tutorials" link in the scope section to match the "What next?" link in the table of contents.
|
|
|
|
Replaced "len" by "length", to match the given code example.
|
|
- Use Fira Sans for headlines, Heuristica for the body (Adobe Utopia derivative). Both are licensed under the SIL OFL license. (I didn't include BoldItalic because it is sparingly used.)
- Split TOC into 2 columns for the docs except manual (too tall, too wide to be readable).
- Some fixes to rustdoc, bring styles in coherency with eachother
- A few tweaks
Two examples: [modified tutorial](http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/tutorial.htm) and [modified manual](http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/manual.htm).
Rustdoc got some fixes, here is [modified `enum.FileType`](http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/enum.FileType.htm), [modified `std`](http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/std.htm) and [modified `std::io`](http://adrientetar.legtux.org/cached/rust-docs/io.htm).
#13484, #13485 follow-up.
cc @brson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See #13476
|
|
|
|
port all code over to use it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=cmr
Work on #13287
This is not ready for a merge yet, but I wanted to get some eyes on what I have done so far.
As of right now, all references in the text to managed boxes or pointers are removed. Code associated with those specific sections of text have likewise been altered. I also removed all references to managed closures.
There is a small change I would like to add to the work done in 3137cd5, on the new lines 1495 and 1496, I would like to change those values to 10 and 20. I did the same in a later change on lines 1596 and 1508.
There are still bits of sample code that use managed pointers and the sigil @. Those are next on my list to remove, but I wanted to have the outstanding changes reviewed first. The uses of @ in the code samples are a bit more embedded, and I will need to be more careful changing them as to not change the purpose of the code examples.
I ensured that make check still passes, although I'm not sure if that actually tests the code in tutorial.md.
One issues I ran into, and tried to avoid, was that `tutorial.md` is formatted with a nice column limit. I was unsure how this was enforced, so wherever I edited a line, I did my best to keep edits on the line they previously existed on. As such, the plain text of `tutorial.md` looks a bit strange as I've left it, and I will clean that up as suggested. The rendered markdown output should not be affected.
|
|
This also changes some of the download links in the documentation
to 'nightly'.
|
|
Closes #13285 (rustc: Stop using LLVMGetSectionName)
Closes #13280 (std: override clone_from for Vec.)
Closes #13277 (serialize: add a few missing pubs to base64)
Closes #13275 (Add and remove some ignore-win32 flags)
Closes #13273 (Removed managed boxes from libarena.)
Closes #13270 (Minor copy-editing for the tutorial)
Closes #13267 (fix Option<~ZeroSizeType>)
Closes #13265 (Update emacs mode to support new `#![inner(attribute)]` syntax.)
Closes #13263 (syntax: Remove AbiSet, use one Abi)
|
|
This also changes some of the download links in the documentation
to 'nightly'.
|
|
|
|
examples in relevant sections were similarly altered.
|
|
Merging the 0.10 release into the master branch.
|
|
Note: "different to" is not exactly incorrect, but "different from" is more
commonly accepted in both US and Commonwealth English, and also more
consistent with other usage within this tutorial.
|
|
There are actually three traits listed.
|
|
Remove some statements that used to refer to similarities between `mod` and
`extern mod`, before the latter was renamed to `extern crate`.
|
|
The `Float` trait methods will be usable as functions via UFCS, and
we came to a consensus to remove duplicate functions like this a long
time ago.
It does still make sense to keep the duplicate functions when the trait
methods are static, unless the decision to leave out the in-scope trait
name resolution for static methods changes.
|
|
|
|
The `Float` trait methods will be usable as functions via UFCS, and
we came to a consensus to remove duplicate functions like this a long
time ago.
It does still make sense to keep the duplicate functions when the trait
methods are static, unless the decision to leave out the in-scope trait
name resolution for static methods changes.
|
