| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Support using #[unstable_feature_bound] on trait
This is needed to unblock https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145095
r? ```````@BoxyUwU```````
|
|
Co-authored-by: zachs18 <8355914+zachs18@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
This is more in-line with what Apple's tooling expects, and allows us to
better support custom compiler drivers (such as certain Homebrew and
Nixpkgs compilers) that prefer their own `-isysroot` flag.
Effectively, we now invoke the compiler driver as-if it was invoked as
`xcrun -sdk $sdk_name $tool`.
|
|
This is a documentation-only deprecation for now.
Over time, we can
- warn and then remove on use of unstable environment variables
- warn on use of stable environment variables (no plan to remove due to
compatibility)
Longer term, we expect test runners, like `cargo test`, to provide the
necessary mechanisms for environmental or persistent configuration (e.g.
using cargo config which supports `.cargo/config.toml` as well as
environment variables).
This would include:
- `RUST_TEST_THREADS`
- `RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE`
- `RUST_TEST_SHUFFLE` (unstable)
- `RUST_TEST_SHUFFLE_SEED` (unstable)
The primary outcomes for this change are
- Reducing the scope of what is expected for custom test harnesses to
implement
- Reduce the mechanisms that test runners, like `cargo test`, are
expected to track when they are being bypassed to protect against
negative interactions, e.g. `RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE=1` when json output
is being read.
|
|
see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145253 for reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, remove redundant word
|
|
|
|
r=ChrisDenton
Stabilize `duration_constructors_lite` feature
This closes [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140881) and stabilises `Duration::from_hours` and `Duration::from_mins` while not touching a `duration_constructors` feature from the related [tracking issue (2)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120301)
|
|
Stabilize loongarch32 inline asm
r? ````````@Amanieu````````
|
|
unstable-book: Add stubs for environment variables; document some of the important ones
This uses a very hacky regex that will probably miss some variables. But having some docs seems better than none at all.
In particular, this documents the following env vars explicitly (cc ````````@madsmtm```````` ````````@flba-eb```````` - do the docs for SDKROOT and QNX_TARGET look right?):
- COLORTERM
- QNX_TARGET
- SDKROOT
- TERM
and generates stubs for the following env vars:
- RUST_BACKTRACE
- RUSTC_BLESS
- RUSTC_BREAK_ON_ICE
- RUSTC_CTFE_BACKTRACE
- RUSTC_FORCE_RUSTC_VERSION
- RUSTC_GRAPHVIZ_FONT
- RUSTC_ICE
- RUSTC_LOG
- RUSTC_RETRY_LINKER_ON_SEGFAULT
- RUSTC_TRANSLATION_NO_DEBUG_ASSERT
- RUST_DEP_GRAPH_FILTER
- RUST_DEP_GRAPH
- RUST_FORBID_DEP_GRAPH_EDGE
- RUST_MIN_STACK
- RUST_TARGET_PATH
- UNSTABLE_RUSTDOC_TEST_LINE
- UNSTABLE_RUSTDOC_TEST_PATH
rendered: 
|
|
Co-authored-by: Florian Bartels <108917393+flba-eb@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mads Marquart <mads@marquart.dk>
|
|
|
|
The official Discord server is no longer active (cannot be posted to).
|
|
|
|
Add minimal `armv7a-vex-v5` tier three target
This PR adds minimal, `no_std` support for the VEX V5 Brain, a robotics microcontroller used in educational contexts. In comparison to rust-lang/rust#131530, which aimed to add this same target, these changes are limited in scope to the compiler.
## Tier 3 Target Policy Compliance
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
Lewis McClelland (`@lewisfm),` `@Tropix126,` Gavin Niederman (`@Gavin-Niederman),` and Max Niederman (`@max-niederman)` will be the designated maintainers for `armv7a-vex-v5` support.
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
`armv7a-vex-v5` follows the cpu-vendor-model convention used by most tier three targets. For example: `armv76k-nintendo-3ds` or `armv7k-apple-watchos`.
> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
> If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
This target name is not confusing.
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
It's using open source tools only.
> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
>
> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Understood.
> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
There are no new dependencies/features required in the current state of this target. Porting the standard library will likely require depending on the crate `vex-sdk` which is MIT-licensed and contains bindings to the VEX SDK runtime (which is included in VEXos).
> Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
>
> "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
Although the VEX V5 Brain and its SDK are proprietary, this target does not link to any proprietary binaries or libraries, and is based solely on publicly available information about the VEX SDK.
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
>
> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
I understand.
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
This initial PR only contains a compiler target definition to teach the `cc` crate about this target. Porting the standard library is the next step for this target.
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
This target is documented in `src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/armv7a-vex-v5.md`.
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
>
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
I understand and assent.
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
>
> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
I understand and assent.
> Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)
`armv7a-vex-v5` has nearly identical codegen to `armv7a-none-eabihf`, so this is not an issue.
> If a tier 3 target stops meeting these requirements, or the target maintainers no longer have interest or time, or the target shows no signs of activity and has not built for some time, or removing the target would improve the quality of the Rust codebase, we may post a PR to remove it; any such PR will be CCed to the target maintainers (and potentially other people who have previously worked on the target), to check potential interest in improving the situation.
I understand.
|
|
coverage: Remove all unstable support for MC/DC instrumentation
Preliminary support for a partial implementation of “Modified Condition/Decision Coverage” instrumentation was added behind the unstable flag `-Zcoverage-options=mcdc` in 2024. These are the most substantial PRs involved:
- rust-lang/rust#123409
- rust-lang/rust#126733
At the time, I accepted these PRs with relatively modest scrutiny, because I did not want to stand in the way of independent work on MC/DC instrumentation. My hope was that ongoing work by interested contributors would lead to the code becoming clearer and more maintainable over time.
---
However, that MC/DC code has proven itself to be a major burden on overall maintenance of coverage instrumentation, and a major obstacle to other planned improvements, such as internal changes needed for proper support of macro expansion regions.
I have also become reluctant to accept any further MC/DC-related changes that would increase this burden.
That tension has resulted in an unhappy impasse. On one hand, the present MC/DC implementation is not yet complete, and shows little sign of being complete at an acceptable level of code quality in the foreseeable future. On the other hand, the continued existence of this partial MC/DC implementation is imposing serious maintenance burdens on every other aspect of coverage instrumentation, and is preventing some of the very improvements that would make it easier to accept expanded MC/DC support in the future.
While I know this will be disappointing to some, I think the healthy way forward is accept that I made the wrong call in accepting the current implementation, and to remove it entirely from the compiler.
|
|
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
Lewis McClelland (lewisfm), Tropix126, Gavin Niederman (Gavin-Niederman), and Max Niederman (max-niederman) will be the designated maintainers for `armv7a-vex-v5` support.
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
`armv7a-vex-v5` follows the cpu-vendor-model convention used by most tier three targets. For example: `armv76k-nintendo-3ds` or `armv7k-apple-watchos`.
> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
> If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
This target name is not confusing.
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
It's using open source tools only.
> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
>
> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Understood.
> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
There are no new dependencies/features required in the current state of this target. Porting the standard library will likely require depending on the crate `vex-sdk` which is MIT-licensed and contains bindings to the VEX SDK runtime (which is included in VEXos).
> Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
>
> "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
Although the VEX V5 Brain and its SDK are proprietary, this target does not link to any proprietary binaries or libraries, and is based solely on publicly available information about the VEX SDK.
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
>
> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
I understand.
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
This initial PR only contains a compiler target definition to teach the `cc` crate about this target. Porting the standard library is the next step for this target.
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
This target is documented in `src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/armv7a-vex-v5.md`.
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via @) to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
>
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
I understand and assent.
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
>
> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
I understand and assent.
> Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)
`armv7a-vex-v5` has nearly identical codegen to `armv7a-none-eabihf`, so this is not an issue.
> If a tier 3 target stops meeting these requirements, or the target maintainers no longer have interest or time, or the target shows no signs of activity and has not built for some time, or removing the target would improve the quality of the Rust codebase, we may post a PR to remove it; any such PR will be CCed to the target maintainers (and potentially other people who have previously worked on the target), to check potential interest in improving the situation.
I understand.
Co-authored-by: Max Niederman <max@maxniederman.com>
Co-authored-by: Tropical <42101043+Tropix126@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gavin Niederman <gavinniederman@gmail.com>
|
|
rustc-dev-guide subtree update
Subtree update of `rustc-dev-guide` to https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/commit/1beca6333e2de8df2d002613c7c8fce55a1a1257.
Created using https://github.com/rust-lang/josh-sync.
r? `@ghost`
|
|
Update books
## rust-lang/book
5 commits in b2d1a0821e12a676b496d61891b8e3d374a8e832..3e9dc46aa563ca0c53ec826c41b05f10c5915925
2025-08-02 01:33:29 UTC to 2025-07-14 21:23:38 UTC
- Appendix B and Appendix D from tech review (rust-lang/book#4466)
- Chapter 21 from tech review (rust-lang/book#4464)
- Chapter 20 from tech review (rust-lang/book#4460)
- Chapter 19 from tech review (rust-lang/book#4446)
- Chapter 18 from tech review (rust-lang/book#4445)
## rust-lang/reference
12 commits in 1f45bd41fa6c17b7c048ed6bfe5f168c4311206a..1be151c051a082b542548c62cafbcb055fa8944f
2025-08-05 19:51:40 UTC to 2025-07-14 19:49:01 UTC
- Fix build output directory in README (rust-lang/reference#1950)
- Update `link_name` to use the attribute template (rust-lang/reference#1896)
- Update `no_link` to use the attribute template (rust-lang/reference#1898)
- Update `proc_macro_derive` to use the attribute template (rust-lang/reference#1888)
- Update `automatically_derived` to use the attribute template (rust-lang/reference#1884)
- Update `derive` to use the attribute template (rust-lang/reference#1883)
- Fix and clarify CR LF normalization and CR in string literals (rust-lang/reference#1944)
- glossary.md: tweak description of "dispatch" (rust-lang/reference#1938)
- add missing id, r[asm.operand-type.supported-operands.const] (rust-lang/reference#1939)
- &str and &[u8] have the same layout (rust-lang/reference#1848)
- Rename and rewrite the "question mark operator" (rust-lang/reference#1931)
- Change "allocated object" to "allocation". (rust-lang/reference#1930)
## rust-lang/rust-by-example
3 commits in e386be5f44af711854207c11fdd61bb576270b04..bd1279cdc9865bfff605e741fb76a0b2f07314a7
2025-08-04 13:41:04 UTC to 2025-08-02 15:41:59 UTC
- Improve the activity instructions in `print_display` (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1948)
- Minor fixes (whitespace, typo, i32->u32) (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1947)
- Document drawbacks of alternatives to match binding (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1946)
|
|
add nvptx_target_feature
Tracking issue: #141468 (nvptx), which is part of #44839 (catch-all arches)
The feature gate is `#![feature(nvptx_target_feature)]`
This exposes the target features `sm_20` through `sm_120a` [as defined](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-20.1.1/llvm/lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTX.td#L59-L85) by LLVM.
Cc: ``````@gonzalobg``````
``````@rustbot`````` label +O-NVPTX +A-target-feature
|
|
|
|
Pull recent changes from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust via Josh.
Upstream ref: 6bcdcc73bd11568fd85f5a38b58e1eda054ad1cd
Filtered ref: 6cc4ce79e1f8dc0ec5a2e18049b9c1a51dee3221
This merge was created using https://github.com/rust-lang/josh-sync.
|
|
This updates the rust-version file to 6bcdcc73bd11568fd85f5a38b58e1eda054ad1cd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's already a link in the other direction, so this seems fairly logical.
|
|
Add documentation for unstable_feature_bound
There is more detail and explanation in https://hackmd.io/``````@tiif/Byd3mq7Ige``````
Original PR that implemented this: rust-lang/rust#140399
r? ``````@BoxyUwU`````` to nominate for types team discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update installation.md
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jens Reidel <adrian@travitia.xyz>
|
|
rustc-dev-guide subtree update
Subtree update of `rustc-dev-guide` to https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/commit/1263fc23672325c1d2e3d6bba8a7dd89e986245c.
Created using https://github.com/rust-lang/josh-sync.
r? ``@ghost``
|
|
|
|
The `--enable-offload` and `--enable--enzyme` arguments don't seem to work.
Changing them to `--enable-llvm-offload` and `--enable-llvm-enzyme` resulted in the `boostrap.toml` file generating succesfully.
|
|
|
|
Pull recent changes from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust via Josh.
Upstream ref: 383b9c447b61641e1f1a3850253944a897a60827
Filtered ref: 14b7b0bbd1e38402fca29ef84e5f75ee9d8cb1a9
This merge was created using https://github.com/rust-lang/josh-sync.
|
|
This updates the rust-version file to 383b9c447b61641e1f1a3850253944a897a60827.
|
|
Stylize `*-lynxos178-*` target maintainer handle to make it easier to copy/paste
Apparently I forgot to submit this branch I had lying around.
Noticed while reviewing Tier 3 target platform support pages. In the same style as rust-lang/rust#139028.
|
|
r=jieyouxu
Remove the omit_gdb_pretty_printer_section attribute
Disabling loading of pretty printers in the debugger itself is more reliable. Before this commit the .gdb_debug_scripts section couldn't be included in dylibs or rlibs as otherwise there is no way to disable the section anymore without recompiling the entire standard library.
|
|
|
|
make toc generation fully automatic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rustc pull update
|
|
Disabling loading of pretty printers in the debugger itself is more
reliable. Before this commit the .gdb_debug_scripts section couldn't be
included in dylibs or rlibs as otherwise there is no way to disable the
section anymore without recompiling the entire standard library.
|
