| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
clean our crates
|
|
Add an issue template for future-incompatible lints
This adds a GitHub issue template for future-incompatible lints. Most of the existing tracking issues have been using different formats with different information, and I think it would be helpful to make them a little more consistent and to ensure that sufficient information is provided.
Some comments on my choices:
* Added a dedicated section to describe *why* the change is being made. Many existing issues already have this, so let's standardize on it.
* Have a section with a very clear example. Almost all of the existing issues have this in one form or another.
* Added a "Recommendations" section, since this is something I see missing in several of the existing issues, and this is really important information IMHO.
* I reworded the "When" section. The existing template mentioned that these get reviewed every 6 weeks which my understanding is not true. That's also not very helpful information to the user, since it doesn't really answer the question. I'm not sure this section will actually be useful since I suspect most of the time we don't know when it will change (there have been a few exceptions).
* Clearly show the expected progression steps. Several issues already have this.
* Added implementation history, which is useful for linking PRs. (IDK, this could get merged with "Steps".)
|
|
|
|
Stage0 bootstrap update
This PR [follows the release process](https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#master-bootstrap-update-tuesday) to update the stage0 compiler.
The only thing of note is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/58651d1b316e268fac2100c3ae37bb502a36b8ba, which was flagged by clippy as a correctness fix. I think allowing that lint in our case makes sense, but it's worth to have a second pair of eyes on it.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed in PR 2378; the note was outdated.
|
|
|
|
Remove mono item collection strategy override from -Zprint-mono-items
Previously `-Zprint-mono-items` would override the mono item collection
strategy. When debugging one doesn't want to change the behaviour, so
this was counter productive. Additionally, the produced behaviour was
artificial and might never arise without using the option in the first
place (`-Zprint-mono-items=eager` without `-Clink-dead-code`). Finally,
the option was incorrectly marked as `UNTRACKED`.
Resolve those issues, by turning `-Zprint-mono-items` into a boolean
flag that prints results of mono item collection without changing the
behaviour of mono item collection.
For codegen-units test incorporate `-Zprint-mono-items` flag directly
into compiletest tool.
Test changes are mechanical. `-Zprint-mono-items=lazy` was removed
without additional changes, and `-Zprint-mono-items=eager` was turned
into `-Clink-dead-code`. Linking dead code disables internalization, so
tests have been updated accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Split duration_constructors to get non-controversial constructors out
This implements #140881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They are internal tools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This made it look the the topic was covered in the chapter just before
the current one.
|
|
add rdg push git config entry for git protocol pushers
|
|
|
|
Update the edition guide for let chains
Pull https://github.com/rust-lang/edition-guide/pull/337 into the rustc tree.
|
|
|
|
Fix minor typo in rustdoc-internals.md
|
|
|
|
Previously `-Zprint-mono-items` would override the mono item collection
strategy. When debugging one doesn't want to change the behaviour, so
this was counter productive. Additionally, the produced behaviour was
artificial and might never arise without using the option in the first
place (`-Zprint-mono-items=eager` without `-Clink-dead-code`). Finally,
the option was incorrectly marked as `UNTRACKED`.
Resolve those issues, by turning `-Zprint-mono-items` into a boolean
flag that prints results of mono item collection without changing the
behaviour of mono item collection.
For codegen-units test incorporate `-Zprint-mono-items` flag directly
into compiletest tool.
Test changes are mechanical. `-Zprint-mono-items=lazy` was removed
without additional changes, and `-Zprint-mono-items=eager` was turned
into `-Clink-dead-code`. Linking dead code disables internalization, so
tests have been updated accordingly.
|
|
Do not deny warnings in "fast" try builds
When we do the classic ``@bors` try` build without specifying `try-job` in the PR description, we want to get a compiler toolchain for perf./crater/local experimentation as fast as possible. We don't run any tests in that case, so it seems reasonable to also ignore warnings.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140753
r? `@jieyouxu`
try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
style: Never break within a nullary function call `func()` or a unit literal `()`
Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/style-team/issues/210
|
|
allow deref patterns to participate in exhaustiveness analysis
Per [this proposal](https://hackmd.io/4qDDMcvyQ-GDB089IPcHGg#Exhaustiveness), this PR allows deref patterns to participate in exhaustiveness analysis. Currently all deref patterns enforce `DerefPure` bounds on their scrutinees, so this assumes all patterns it's analyzing are well-behaved. This also doesn't support [mixed exhaustiveness](https://hackmd.io/4qDDMcvyQ-GDB089IPcHGg#Mixed-exhaustiveness), and instead emits an error if deref patterns are used together with normal constructors. I think mixed exhaustiveness would be nice to have (especially if we eventually want to support arbitrary `Deref` impls[^1]), but it'd require more work to get reasonable diagnostics[^2].
Tracking issue for deref patterns: #87121
r? `@Nadrieril`
[^1]: Regardless of whether we support limited exhaustiveness checking for untrusted `Deref` or always require other arms to be exhaustive, I think it'd be useful to allow mixed matching for user-defined smart pointers. And it'd be strange if it worked there but not for `Cow`.
[^2]: I think listing out witnesses of non-exhaustiveness can be confusing when they're not necessarily disjoint, and when you only need to cover some of them, so we'd probably want special formatting and/or explanatory subdiagnostics. And if it's implemented similarly to unions, we'd probably also want some way of merging witnesses; the way witnesses for unions can appear duplicated is pretty unfortunate. I'm not sure yet how the diagnostics should look, especially for deeply nested patterns.
|
|
`()`
|
|
r=jieyouxu
add armv5te-unknown-linux-gnueabi target maintainer
My employer is interested in having this target maintained and we already have some tests in our CI running for it.
armv5te-unknown-linux-gnueabi can be ticket off in #113739.
|
|
Separate dataflow analysis and results
`Analysis` gets put into `Results` with `EntryStates`, by `iterate_to_fixpoint`. This has two problems:
- `Results` is passed various places where only `Analysis` is needed.
- `EntryStates` is passed around mutably everywhere even though it is immutable.
This commit mostly separates `Analysis` from `Results` and fixes these two problems.
r? `@davidtwco`
|
|
|
|
Stabilize precise capture syntax in style guide
Closes #138527
r? `@jieyouxu`
|
