| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
add a csky-unknown-linux-gnuabiv2 target
This is the rustc side changes to support csky based Linux target(`csky-unknown-linux-gnuabiv2`).
Tier 3 policy:
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I pledge to do my best maintaining it.
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
This `csky` section is the arch name and the `unknown-linux` section is the same as other linux target, and `gnuabiv2` is from the cross-compile toolchain of `gcc`
> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
I think the explanation in platform support doc is enough to make this aspect clear.
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
It's using open source tools only.
> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
No new license
> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Understood.
> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
There are no new dependencies/features required.
> Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
As previously said it's using open source tools only.
> "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
There are no such terms present/
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
I'm not the reviewer here.
> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
I'm not the reviewer here.
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
It supports for std
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
I have added the documentation, and I think it's clear.
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
Understood.
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
Understood.
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
I believe I didn't break any other target.
> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
I think there are no such problems in this PR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just remove a typo.
|
|
r=Mark-Simulacrum
Mention riscv64-linux-android support in Android documentation
This CL brings the android.md file in-line with the list of supported targets from platform-support.md.
Followup to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112858
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
add aarch64-unknown-teeos target
TEEOS is a mini os run in TrustZone, for trusted/security apps. The libc of TEEOS is a part of musl. The kernel of TEEOS is micro kernel.
This MR is to add a target for teeos.
MRs for libc and rust-std are in progress.
Compiler team MCP: [MCP](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/652)
|
|
This CL brings the android.md file in-line with the list of supported
targets from platform-support.md.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`as` casts currently get formatted like a binary operator, except that
the second line can stack several `as` casts rather than breaking them
each onto their own line. Merge `as` into a subsection of the binary
operators section, and then go into detail on the one difference between
`as` formatting and binary operator formatting.
|
|
It lints against features that are inteded to be internal to the
compiler and standard library. Implements MCP #596.
We allow `internal_features` in the standard library and compiler as those
use many features and this _is_ the standard library from the "internal to the compiler and
standard library" after all.
Marking some features as internal wasn't exactly the most scientific approach, I just marked some
mostly obvious features. While there is a categorization in the macro,
it's not very well upheld (should probably be fixed in another PR).
We always pass `-Ainternal_features` in the testsuite
About 400 UI tests and several other tests use internal features.
Instead of throwing the attribute on each one, just always allow them.
There's nothing wrong with testing internal features^^
|
|
WASI threads, implementation of wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads target
This PR adds a target proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/574 by `@abrown` and implementation of `std::thread::spawn` for the target `wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads`
### Tier 3 Target Policy
As tier 3 targets, the new targets are required to adhere to [the tier 3 target policy](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/target-tier-policy.html#tier-3-target-policy) requirements. This section quotes each requirement in entirety and describes how they are met.
> - A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
See [src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads.md](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112922/files#diff-a48ee9d94f13e12be24eadd08eb47b479c153c340eeea4ef22276d876dfd4f3e).
> - Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
> - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
The target is using the same name for $ARCH=wasm32 and $OS=wasi as existing Rust targets. The suffix `preview1` introduced to accurately set expectations because eventually this target will be deprecated and follows [MCP 607](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/607). The suffix `threads` indicates that it’s an extension that enables threads to the existing target and it follows [MCP 574](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/574) which describes the rationale behind introducing a separate target.
> - Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
> - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
> - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
> - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
> - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
This PR does not introduce any new dependency.
The new target doesn’t support building host tools.
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
The full standard library is available for this target as it’s an extension to an existing target that has already supported it.
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Only manual test running is supported at the moment with some tweaks in the test runner codebase. For build and running tests see [src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads.md](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112922/files#diff-a48ee9d94f13e12be24eadd08eb47b479c153c340eeea4ef22276d876dfd4f3e).
> - Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
> - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
> - Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
> - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
> - Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
> - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
I acknowledge these requirements and intend to ensure they are met.
|
|
Update books
## rust-lang/reference
7 commits in 1ea0178266b3f3f613b0fabdaf16a83961c99cdb..9cd5c5a6ccbd4c07c65ab5c69a53286280308c95
2023-07-29 22:29:51 UTC to 2023-07-16 20:12:46 UTC
- Fix merge queue building twice. (rust-lang/reference#1383)
- Clarify UB around immutability & mutation (rust-lang/reference#1385)
- mention the extra const UB (rust-lang/reference#1273)
- Operator expressions: make the note about division by zero clearer. (rust-lang/reference#1384)
- Make unsafe keyword docs less confusing (rust-lang/reference#1379)
- Say that division by zero for primitive types panics (rust-lang/reference#1382)
- Add CI trigger for merge queues. (rust-lang/reference#1381)
## rust-lang/rust-by-example
3 commits in 8a87926a985ce32ca1fad1be4008ee161a0b91eb..07e0df2f006e59d171c6bf3cafa9d61dbeb520d8
2023-07-24 11:37:55 UTC to 2023-07-24 11:35:36 UTC
- Added attribute unused_labels - fixed warning. (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1729)
- more explanation about panic (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1728)
- chore: add the portuguese version of this project to `readme.md` (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1727)
## rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
26 commits in b5a12d95e32ae53791cc6ab44417774667ed2ac6..24eebb6df96d037aad285e4f7793bd0393a66878
2023-07-30 11:23:23 UTC to 2023-07-11 06:02:34 UTC
- fix(name-resolution): remove unnecessary closing paranthesis (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1760)
- fix(macro-expansion.md): fix the article `an` to `a` (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1759)
- fix(serialization.md): fix the name of a derive macro (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1756)
- fix(serialization.md): add a necessary plural suffix (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1757)
- fix(salsa.md): add punctuation to prevent confusion (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1754)
- fix(salsa.md): remove duplicate "To Be" verb (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1755)
- feat(fuzzing.md): make `halfempty` word a link (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1750)
- fix(about.md): use `a` instead of `an` (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1751)
- refactor(git.md): make git-scm links clickable (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1747)
- fix(walkthrough.md) add a comma operator to eliminate ambiguity (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1749)
- fix(git.md): remove a confusing end of sentence character (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1748)
- refactor(profiling/with_perf): remove a wrong to be verb (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1746)
- refactor(tests/headers): remove duplicate list item (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1745)
- refactor(test/headers.md): make the meaning more obvious (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1744)
- refactor(tests/ui): remove unnecessary duplicate word (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1743)
- refactor(compiletest): remove unnecessary duplicate word (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1742)
- generic_arguments.md: substs -> GenericArgs (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1741)
- fix(suggested): remove an unnecessary and confusing statement (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1739)
- fix(how-to-build-and-run): fix a typo ("fromer" -> "former") (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1736)
- fix(how-to-build-and-run): remove a wrong paragraph (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1735)
- coverage code has moved (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1728)
- linked issue is closed (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1729)
- remove duplicate reference in about-this-guide.md (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1734)
- Explain more in depth what early and late bound generic parameters are (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1732)
- add section for normalization with the new solver (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1731)
- Improve cleanup-crew.md with an example post (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1730)
|
|
Improve the rust style guide doc
- Make the levels of headings consistent in this whole document.
Before this change, the highest level of headings in some file is level 1, but in most of the files the that is level 2. Not consistent.
- Fix some headings
- Follow the markdown linter advices
- Remove redundant empty lines
- Surround each heading with empty lines
- Use the same symbol for different levels of unordered list entries
|
|
r=joshtriplett
Directly link more target docs
Some platforms were not linked from platform-support.md
This fixes that, but errs towards extremely conservative, only directly linking platform docs if the docs actively mention the target, as otherwise I do not necessarily know if there was a reason for the omission.
|
|
style-guide: Document style editions, start 2024 style edition
Link to a snapshot for the 2015/2018/2021 style edition.
This is a draft, because I'd like to wait for a few style guide fixes to merge
before snapshotting the 2015/2018/2021 style edition:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113145
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113380
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113384
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113385
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113386
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113392
I'd like to wait for these for two reasons: to make it easier to see the
differences between the 2015/2018/2021 style edition and the 2024 style
edition (without the noise of guide-wide changes), and to minimize confusion so
that bugfixes to the style guide that we include in the previous edition don't
look like they're only part of the 2024 style edition.
I've used "Miscellaneous `rustfmt` bugfixes" as a starting point for the list
of 2024 changes, for now. We can update that when we add more 2024 changes.
The section added in this PR can then serve as a baseline for our drafts of
2024 style edition changes.
In the meantime, I'd like to get someone from `@rust-lang/style` to review and
approve the text here; I'll update it with a commit hash when the above PRs
have merged.
|
|
Some platforms were not linked from platform-support.md
This fixes that, but errs towards extremely conservative,
only directly linking platform docs if the docs actively
mention the target, as otherwise I do not necessarily
know if there was a reason for the omission.
|
|
|
|
Link to a snapshot for the 2015/2018/2021 style edition.
|
|
|
|
Update Android system definitions and add riscv-linux-android as tier 3 target
This PR includes the following:
* Corrected Android system definitions for some types
* Support for the riscv64-linux-android target
The authoritative types for the system definitions can be found here: https://cs.android.com/android/platform/superproject/+/master:bionic/libc/include/sys/stat.h
Fixes rust-lang/compiler-team#640
|
|
Because it's usefulness wasn't clear to me, and I initially wondered if
it could be removed. The text is based on the text in #50972, the PR
that added the flag.
|
|
|
|
- Make the levels of headings consistent in this whole document
- Fix some headings
- Remove redundant empty lines
- Follow the markdown linter advices to use the same symbol for different level of unordered list entries
|
|
|
|
style-guide: don't flatten match arms with macro call
This pulls forward the gist of the text that was added to the style guide in https://github.com/rust-lang/style-team/pull/159 to account for needing to tweak/soften rustfmt's behavior based on the style guide prescriptions.
There were a few options I considered, noted below, and although I don't particularly love any of them, I felt this was the lesser of the evils.
r? `@joshtriplett`
|
|
Add documentation on v0 symbol mangling.
This adds official documentation for the v0 symbol mangling format, migrating the documentation from [RFC 2603](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2603-rust-symbol-name-mangling-v0.html).
The format was originally stabilized as the `-C symbol-mangling-version` option, but the specifics were not stabilized (per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90128#issuecomment-948569123).
Per the discussion at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93661#discussion_r799783363 this adds those specifics as an official description of the format.
cc #89917
|
|
|
|
Formats lines in the exploit mitigations documentation to be at maximum
80 characters long.
|
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113780 should have gone through
an MCP+FCP but wasn't, but instead of reverting the original PR, this PR
just make that new option unstable.
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: 袁浩 <yuanhao34@huawei.com>
|
|
Add `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl` target
This introduces `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl` as the first Rust target for the [Unikraft] Unikernel Development Kit.
[Unikraft]: https://unikraft.org/
Unikraft imitates Linux and uses musl as libc.
It is extremely configurable, and does not even provide a `poll` implementation or a network stack, unless enabled by the end user who compiles the application.
Our approach for integrating the build process with `rustc` is to hide the build process as well as the actual final linking step behind a linker-shim (`kraftld`, see https://github.com/unikraft/kraftkit/issues/612).
## Tier 3 target policy
> - A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target
> maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target.
> (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I will be the target maintainer.
> - Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a
> target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same
> name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and
> naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust
> (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to
> diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially
> once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important
> even for a tier 3 target.
> - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless
> absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if
> the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect
> beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to
> disambiguate it.
> - If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name.
> Periods (`.`) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
The target name `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl` was derived from `x86_64-unknown-linux-musl`, setting Unikraft as vendor.
Unikraft exactly imitates Linux + musl.
> - Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not
> create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for
> Rust developers or users.
> - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
> - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust
> license (`MIT OR Apache-2.0`).
> - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other
> host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend
> on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This
> applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding
> new license exceptions (as specified by the `tidy` tool in the
> rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library
> or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a
> user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be
> subject to any new license requirements.
> - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other
> code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling
> from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries.
> Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime
> libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications
> built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code
> generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require
> such libraries at all. For instance, `rustc` built for the target may
> depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library,
> but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code
> optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the
> Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the
> scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous"
> legal/licensing terms include but are *not* limited to: non-disclosure
> requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements
> (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms,
> requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular
> Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability
> for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that
> adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its
> developers or users.
No dependencies were added to Rust.
Requirements for linking are [Unikraft] and [KraftKit] (both BSD-3-Clause), but none of these are added to Rust.
[KraftKit]: https://github.com/unikraft/kraftkit
> - Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any
> binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving
> Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or
> employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their
> decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval
> decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise
> participate in discussions.
> - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being
> cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or
> maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a
> developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not
> face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely
> exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves
> subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Understood.
I am not a member of a Rust team.
> - Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries
> as possible and appropriate (`core` for most targets, `alloc` for targets
> that can support dynamic memory allocation, `std` for targets with an
> operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but
> may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as
> appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or
> challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to
> avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3
> target not implementing those portions.
Understood.
`std` is supported.
> - The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how
> to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target
> supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the
> documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target,
> using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Building is described in the platform support doc.
It will be updated once proper `kraftld` support has landed.
> - Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or
> other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular,
> do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a
> block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or
> notifications (via any medium, including via ``@`)` to a PR author or others
> involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into
> such messages.
> - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to
> an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within
> reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not
> generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested
> such notifications.
Understood.
> - Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2
> or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without
> approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3
> target.
> - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets,
> such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid
> introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the
> target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as
> appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
I don't think this PR breaks anything.
r? compiler-team
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Kröning <martin.kroening@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de>
|
|
Update sparc-unknown-none-elf platform README
Cherry picked a couple of commits that didn't quite make it in #113535
|
|
|
|
|
|
This came from x86_64-unknown-none and doesn't make sense here.
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Kröning <martin.kroening@eonerc.rwth-aachen.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use consistent phrasing, and add an "and".
|
|
Long text without numeric numbers when numeric numbers are used are hard to read.
|
|
|
