| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Add new rustdoc book chapter to describe in-doc settings
Fixes #55165.
I continue going through old rustdoc issues. This one made a lot of sense so decided to add the missing chapter.
r? ``@notriddle``
|
|
Spelling rustdoc
Split per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110392#issuecomment-1510148682
|
|
Add loongarch64 asm! support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add support for the x86_64h-apple-darwin target
See https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/599 for MCP.
r? compiler-team
CC `@BlackHoleFox` who recently overhauled the apple target code in `rustc-target`.
## Target Support Checklist
> - A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target
> maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target.
> (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I'm the designated developer.
> - Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a
> target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same
> name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and
> naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust
> (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to
> diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially
> once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important
> even for a tier 3 target.
This uses the same naming conventions used for the other macOS targets (`-apple-darwin`), combined with the convention used by LLVM for the `x86_64h` targets. LLVM's convention matches the architecture name used when invoking various tools such as `lipo`, `arch`, and (IMO) there's not really a compelling reason to depart from it.
> - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless
> absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if
> the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect
> beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to
> disambiguate it.
I don't think this is especially likely, although I suppose someone could mistake it for `x86_64-apple-darwin`.
> - If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name.
> Periods (`.`) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
👍
> - Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not
> create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for
> Rust developers or users.
> - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
It does not.
> - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust
> license (`MIT OR Apache-2.0`).
It is.
> - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other
> host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend
> on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This
> applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding
> new license exceptions (as specified by the `tidy` tool in the
> rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library
> or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a
> user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be
> subject to any new license requirements.
There are no new dependencies that don't also apply to `x86_64-apple-darwin`.
> - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other
> code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling
> from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries.
> Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime
> libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications
> built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code
> generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require
> such libraries at all. For instance, `rustc` built for the target may
> depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library,
> but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code
> optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the
> Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the
> scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
This has the same requirements as the other macOS targets (e.g. `x86_64-apple-darwin` and similar).
> - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous"
> legal/licensing terms include but are *not* limited to: non-disclosure
> requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements
> (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms,
> requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular
> Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability
> for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that
> adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its
> developers or users.
No change here.
> - Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any
> binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving
> Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or
> employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their
> decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval
> decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise
> participate in discussions.
👍
> - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being
> cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or
> maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a
> developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not
> face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely
> exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves
> subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
👍
> - Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries
> as possible and appropriate (`core` for most targets, `alloc` for targets
> that can support dynamic memory allocation, `std` for targets with an
> operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but
> may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as
> appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or
> challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to
> avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3
> target not implementing those portions.
The standard library tests seem to pass.
> - The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how
> to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target
> supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the
> documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target,
> using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Documentation is provided.
> - Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or
> other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular,
> do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a
> block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or
> notifications (via any medium, including via ``@`)` to a PR author or others
> involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into
> such messages.
Noted. This target is nearly identical to `x86_64-apple-darwin`, so this is
unlikely to cause issues anyway.
> - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to
> an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within
> reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not
> generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested
> such notifications.
👍
> - Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2
> or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without
> approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3
> target.
> - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets,
> such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid
> introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the
> target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as
> appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
👍
|
|
|
|
|
|
GuillaumeGomez:disambiguators-suffixes-rustdoc-book, r=Manishearth
Add list of supported disambiguators and suffixes for intra-doc links in the rustdoc book
This information is otherwise only provided in case an error occurs, which isn't great.
r? ```@notriddle```
|
|
Correct default value for default-linker-libraries
This setting is false by default according to rustc code here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_session/src/options.rs#L1236
I tested on a project and confirmed the behavior described. First, with no value, the `-nodefaultlibs` linker flag is present. Setting this to false has no effect, as well. The linker flag still appears. Setting it to true removes the linker flag as expected.
|
|
rustdoc book
|
|
* incompatibilities
* invocation
* keywords
* nonexistent
* shakespeare
* the
* toolchain
* transparent
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
r=GuillaumeGomez
rustdoc-search: add support for nested generics
This change allows `search.js` to parse nested generics (which look `Like<This<Example>>`) and match them. It maintains the existing "bag semantics", so that the order of type parameters is ignored but the number is required to be greater than or equal to what's in the query.
For example, a function with the signature `fn read_all(&mut self: impl Read) -> Result<Vec<u8>, Error>` will match these queries:
* `Read -> Result<Vec<u8>, Error>`
* `Read -> Result<Error, Vec>`
* `Read -> Result<Vec<u8>>`
But it *does not* match `Result<Vec, u8>` or `Result<u8<Vec>>`.
|
|
|
|
This setting is false by default according to rustc code here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_session/src/options.rs#L1236
I tested on a project and confirmed that setting this to false has no
effect, the linker flag still appears. Setting it to true removes the
linker flag.
|
|
r=notriddle
[rustdoc] Add explanations for auto-disambiguation when an intra doc link is resolved to a proc-macro and a trait at the same time
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110111.
r? `@notriddle`
|
|
to a proc-macro and a trait at the same time
|
|
Stabilize rustdoc `--test-run-directory`
This should resolve https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84674
|
|
Add inline assembly support for m68k
I believe this should be correct, to the extent I understand the logic around inline assembly. M68k is fairly straightforward here, other than having separate address registers.
|
|
|
|
Fix `--extend-css` option
Fixes #110002.
The file was generated in the wrong folder so I moved it into `static.files` as it made more sense to have there instead of changing the path in the templates.
I also added a GUI test to ensure that this option won't break unexpectedly again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix typos in librustdoc, tools and config files
I used [`typos`](https://github.com/crate-ci/typos) to fix all typos, minus the ones present in #110153 and in #110154.
Refs #110150
|
|
Initial support for loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Hi, We hope to add a new port in rust for LoongArch.
LoongArch intro
LoongArch is a RISC style ISA which is independently designed by Loongson
Technology in China. It is divided into two versions, the 32-bit version (LA32)
and the 64-bit version (LA64). LA64 applications have application-level
backward binary compatibility with LA32 applications. LoongArch is composed of
a basic part (Loongson Base) and an expanded part. The expansion part includes
Loongson Binary Translation (LBT), Loongson VirtualiZation (LVZ), Loongson SIMD
EXtension (LSX) and Loongson Advanced SIMD EXtension(LASX).
Currently the LA464 processor core supports LoongArch ISA and the Loongson
3A5000 processor integrates 4 64-bit LA464 cores. LA464 is a four-issue 64-bit
high-performance processor core. It can be used as a single core for high-end
embedded and desktop applications, or as a basic processor core to form an
on-chip multi-core system for server and high-performance machine applications.
Documentations:
ISA:
https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-Vol1-EN.html
ABI:
https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html
More docs can be found at:
https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/README-EN.html
Since last year, we have locally adapted two versions of rust, rust1.41 and rust1.57, and completed the test locally.
I'm not sure if I'm submitting all the patches at once, so I split up the patches and here's one of the commits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add tier 3 no_std x86 support for QNX Neutrino RTOS, version 7.0
This PR adds the target `i586-pc-nto-qnx700`, which targets QNX Neutrino RTOS version 7.0 on x86 32-bit targets.
cc: `@flba-eb` `@gh-tr`
This target falls under the umbrella of Tier 3 QNX Neutrino RTOS support documented in `nto-qnx.md` and previously started with #102701.
|
|
Remove `box_syntax` usage
Fixes #109978
|
|
r=notriddle
Remove mention of `missing_doc_code_examples` lint from rustdoc book
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109601.
r? `@notriddle`
|
|
fix in plugin.md
fmt
|
|
Extend -Cdebuginfo with new options and named aliases
This is a rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83947, along with my best guess at what the new options mean. I tried to follow the LLVM source code to get a better idea but ran into quite a lot of trouble (https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187780-t-compiler.2Fwg-llvm/topic/go-to-definition.20in.20src.2Fllvm-project.3F). The description for the original PR follows below.
Note that the changes in this PR have already been through FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83947#issuecomment-878384979
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/109311. Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104968.
r? `@michaelwoerister` cc `@cuviper`
---
The -Cdebuginfo=1 option was never line tables only and can't be due to backwards compatibility issues. This was clarified and an option for emitting line tables only was added. Additionally an option for emitting line info directives only was added, which is needed for some targets, i.e. nvptx. The debug info options should now behave similarly to clang's debug info options.
Fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60020
Fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Switch to LLD as default linker for {arm,thumb}v4t-none-eabi
The LLVM 16 update brought ARMv4t support to LLD. We should use it by default so users don't need to install an external linker.
cc `@Lokathor`
|
|
|
|
|
|
`-Cdebuginfo=1` was never line tables only and
can't be due to backwards compatibility issues.
This was clarified and an option for line tables only
was added. Additionally an option for line info
directives only was added, which is well needed for
some targets. The debug info options should now
behave the same as clang's debug info options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
