| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
Override Box::<[T]>::clone_from
Avoid dropping and reallocating when cloning to an existing box if the lengths are the same.
It would be nice if this could also be specialized for `Copy` but I don't know how that works since it's not on stable. Will gladly look into it if it's deemed as a good idea.
This is my first PR with code, hope I did everything right :smile:
|
|
|
|
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68692
|
|
impl From<Cow> for Box, Rc, and Arc
These forward `Borrowed`/`Owned` values to existing `From` impls.
- `Box<T>` is a fundamental type, so it would be a breaking change to add a blanket impl. Therefore, `From<Cow>` is only implemented for `[T]`, `str`, `CStr`, `OsStr`, and `Path`.
- For `Rc<T>` and `Arc<T>`, `From<Cow>` is implemented for everything that implements `From` the borrowed and owned types separately.
|
|
Add a function to turn Box<T> into Box<[T]>
Hi,
I think this is very useful, as currently it's not possible in safe rust to do this without re-allocating.
an alternative implementation of the same function can be:
```rust
pub fn into_boxed_slice<T>(boxed: Box<T>) -> Box<[T]> {
unsafe {
let slice = slice::from_raw_parts_mut(Box::into_raw(boxed), 1);
Box::from_raw(slice)
}
}
```
The only thing that makes me a little uncomfortable is this line :
> The alignment of array types is greater or equal to the alignment of its element type
from https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/layout/arrays-and-slices.html
But then I see:
> The alignment of &T, &mut T, *const T and *mut T are the same, and are at least the word size.
> The alignment of &[T] is the word size.
from https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/layout/pointers.html#representation
So I do believe this is valid(FWIW it also passes in miri https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=c002b99364ee6b29862aeb3565a91c19)
|
|
|
|
These forward `Borrowed`/`Owned` values to existing `Box::from` impls.
- `From<Cow<'_, [T]>> for Box<[T]>`
- `From<Cow<'_, str>> for Box<str>`
- `From<Cow<'_, CStr>> for Box<CStr>`
- `From<Cow<'_, OsStr>> for Box<OsStr>`
- `From<Cow<'_, Path>> for Box<Path>`
|
|
… instead of the other way around.
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
|
|
Per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/47336#issuecomment-586589016
|
|
This commit changes some usage of mem::forget into mem::ManuallyDrop
in some Vec, VecDeque, BTreeMap and Box methods.
Before the commit, the generated IR for some of the methods was
longer, and even after optimization, some unwinding artifacts were
still present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove `usable_size` APIs
This removes the usable size APIs:
- remove `usable_size` (obv)
- change return type of allocating methods to include the allocated size
- remove `_excess` API
r? @Amanieu
closes rust-lang/wg-allocators#17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generator Resume Arguments
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43122 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56974
Blockers:
* [x] Fix miscompilation when resume argument is live across a yield point (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68524#issuecomment-578459069)
* [x] Fix 10% compile time regression in `await-call-tree` benchmarks (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68524#issuecomment-578487162)
* [x] Fix remaining 1-3% regression (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68524#issuecomment-579566255) - resolved (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68524#issuecomment-581144901)
* [x] Make dropck rules account for resume arguments (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68524#issuecomment-578541137)
Follow-up work:
* Change async/await desugaring to make use of this feature
* Rewrite [`box_region.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/3d8778d767f0dde6fe2bc9459f21ead8e124d8cb/src/librustc_data_structures/box_region.rs) to use resume arguments (this shows up in profiles too)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bespoke `BoxBuilder` was basically a very simple `Vec`. Instead,
let's clone to a real `Vec`, with all of its specialization for the
task, then convert back to `Box<[T]>`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarify `Box<T>` representation and its use in FFI
This officializes what was only shown as a code example in [the unsafe code guidelines](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/layout/function-pointers.html?highlight=box#use) and follows [the discussion](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/157) in the corresponding repository.
It is also related to [the issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52976) regarding marking `Box<T>` `#[repr(transparent)]`.
If the statement this PR adds is incorrect or a more in-depth discussion is warranted, I apologize. Should it be the case, the example in the unsafe code guidelines should be amended and some document should make it clear that it is not sound/supported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MaybeUninit has both uninit() and zeroed(), it seems reasonable to have the same
surface on Box/Rc/Arc.
Needs tests.
|
|
- Use meaningful names
- Clarify comments
- Fix C function declaration
|
|
|
|
Requesting a zero-size allocation is not allowed,
return a dangling pointer instead.
CC https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63291#issuecomment-538692745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This mirrors the implementations of reference slices into arrays.
|
|
Add missing doc links in boxed module
r? @rust-lang/docs
|
|
This officializes what was only shown as a code example in [the unsafe code guidelines](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/layout/function-pointers.html?highlight=box#use) and follows [the discussion](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/157) in the corresponding repository.
It is also related to [the issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52976) regarding marking `Box<T>` `#[repr(transparent)]`.
|