| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
Pin stabilization
This implements the changes suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55766#issue-378417538 and stabilizes the `pin` feature. @alexcrichton also listed several "blockers" in that issue, but then in [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55766#issuecomment-445074980) mentioned that they're more "TODO items":
> In that vein I think it's fine for a stabilization PR to be posted at any time now with FCP lapsed for a week or so now. The final points about self/pin/pinned can be briefly discussed there (if even necessary, they could be left as the proposal above).
Let's settle these last bits here and get this thing stabilized! :)
r? @alexcrichton
cc @withoutboats
|
|
r=QuietMisdreavus
deny intra-doc link resolution failures in libstd
Fixes #56693.
Until we land a fix for the underlying issue (#56922), we can at least fix the failures in libstd so they don't propagate to downstream crates.
|
|
|
|
This lets you write methods using `self: Rc<Self>`, `self: Arc<Self>`, `self: Pin<&mut Self>`, `self: Pin<Box<Self>`, and other combinations involving `Pin` and another stdlib receiver type, without needing the `arbitrary_self_types`. Other user-created receiver types can be used, but they still require the feature flag to use.
This is implemented by introducing a new trait, `Receiver`, which the method receiver's type must implement if the `arbitrary_self_types` feature is not enabled. To keep composed receiver types such as `&Arc<Self>` unstable, the receiver type is also required to implement `Deref<Target=Self>` when the feature flag is not enabled.
This lets you use `self: Rc<Self>` and `self: Arc<Self>` in stable Rust, which was not allowed previously. It was agreed that they would be stabilized in #55786. `self: Pin<&Self>` and other pinned receiver types do not require the `arbitrary_self_types` feature, but they cannot be used on stable because `Pin` still requires the `pin` feature.
|
|
|
|
Add tracking issue for Layout methods (and some API changes)
These methods are already useful when used with the stable global allocator API (stabilized in #51241).
```rust
pub fn align_to(&self, align: usize) -> Result<Layout, LayoutErr>;
pub fn padding_needed_for(&self, align: usize) -> usize;
pub fn repeat(&self, n: usize) -> Result<(Layout, usize), LayoutErr>;
pub fn extend(&self, next: Layout) -> Result<(Layout, usize), LayoutErr>;
pub fn repeat_packed(&self, n: usize) -> Result<Layout, LayoutErr>;
pub fn extend_packed(&self, next: Layout) -> Result<Layout, LayoutErr>;
pub fn array<T>(n: usize) -> Result<Layout, LayoutErr>;
```
cc #32838
r? @SimonSapin
|
|
|
|
Rename `CoerceSized` to `DispatchFromDyn`, and reverse the direction so that, for example, you write
```
impl<T: Unsize<U>, U> DispatchFromDyn<*const U> for *const T {}
```
instead of
```
impl<T: Unsize<U>, U> DispatchFromDyn<*const T> for *const U {}
```
this way the trait is really just a subset of `CoerceUnsized`.
The checks in object_safety.rs are updated for the new trait, and some documentation and method names in there are updated for the new trait name — e.g. `receiver_is_coercible` is now called `receiver_is_dispatchable`. Since the trait now works in the opposite direction, some code had to updated here for that too.
I did not update the error messages for invalid `CoerceSized` (now `DispatchFromDyn`) implementations, except to find/replace `CoerceSized` with `DispatchFromDyn`. Will ask for suggestions in the PR thread.
|
|
This will make receiver types like `Rc<Self>` and `Pin<&mut Self>`
object-safe.
|
|
* Also update the bootstrap compiler
* Update cargo to 1.32.0
* Clean out stage0 annotations
|
|
Fixes #55177
|
|
Fixes #47115
|
|
These work exactly like the normal chunks iterators but start creating
chunks from the end of the slice.
See #55177 for the tracking issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bump to 1.31.0 and bootstrap from 1.30 beta
Closes #54594.
|
|
This reverts commit c6e3d7fa3113aaa64602507f39d4627c427742ff, reversing
changes made to 4591a245c7eec9f70d668982b1383cd2a6854af5.
|
|
|
|
Rename slice::exact_chunks() to slice::chunks_exact()
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/47115#issuecomment-403090815
and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/47115#issuecomment-424053547
|
|
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/47115#issuecomment-403090815
and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/47115#issuecomment-424053547
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update to a new pinning API.
~~Blocked on #53843 because of method resolution problems with new pin type.~~
@r? @cramertj
cc @RalfJung @pythonesque anyone interested in #49150
|
|
Co-authored-by: nikomatsakis
|
|
|
|
|
|
move the Pin API into its own module for centralized documentation
This implements the change proposed by @withoutboats in #49150, as suggested by @RalfJung in the review of #53104,
along with the documentation that was originally in it, that was deemed more appropriate in module-level documentation.
r? @RalfJung
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It contains the re-exports that are in `std::prelude::v1`
but not in `core::prelude::v1`.
Calling it prelude is somewhat of a misnomer since (unlike those modules
in `std` or `core`) its contents are never implicitly imported in modules.
Rather it is intended to be used with an explicit glob import like
`use alloc::prelude::*;`.
However there is precedent for the same misnomer with `std::io::prelude`,
for example.
This new module is unstable with the same feature name as the `alloc` care.
They are proposed for stabilization together in RFC
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2480
|
|
|
|
closes #45085
this commit adds an `atomic_cas` target option and an unstable `#[cfg(target_has_atomic_cas)]`
attribute to enable a subset of the `Atomic*` API on architectures that don't support atomic CAS
natively, like MSP430 and ARMv6-M.
|
|
Bootstrap from 1.28.0 beta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
… since `std` has no corresponding reexports.
Use `alloc::vec::Vec` and `alloc::string::String` instead.
|
|
This matches std::collections
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tracking issue FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43036#issuecomment-394094318
Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/reference/pull/353
|