| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Stabilize slice_sort_by_cached_key
I was going to ask on the tracking issue (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34447), but decided to just send this and hope for an FCP here. The method was added last March by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48639.
Signature: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.slice.html#method.sort_by_cached_key
```rust
impl [T] {
pub fn sort_by_cached_key<K, F>(&mut self, f: F)
where F: FnMut(&T) -> K, K: Ord;
}
```
That's an identical signature to the existing `sort_by_key`, so I think the questions are just naming, implementation, and the usual "do we want this?".
The implementation seems to have proven its use in rustc at least, which many uses: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/search?l=Rust&q=sort_by_cached_key
(I'm asking because it's exactly what I just needed the other day:
```rust
all_positions.sort_by_cached_key(|&n|
data::CITIES.iter()
.map(|x| *metric_closure.get_edge(n, x.pos).unwrap())
.sum::<usize>()
);
```
since caching that key is a pretty obviously good idea.)
Closes #34447
|
|
|
|
documentation"
This reverts commit 9c7b69e17909ceb090a1c4b8882a4e0924a2a755.
|
|
|
|
Stabilize str::escape_* methods with new return types…
… that implement `Display` and `Iterator<Item=char>`, as proposed in FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27791#issuecomment-376864727
|
|
Cosmetic improvements to doc comments
This has been factored out from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/58036 to only include changes to documentation comments (throughout the rustc codebase).
r? @steveklabnik
Once you're happy with this, maybe we could get it through with r=1, so it doesn't constantly get invalidated? (I'm not sure this will be an issue, but just in case...) Anyway, thanks for your advice so far!
|
|
|
|
FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27791#issuecomment-376864727
|
|
As FCP’ed in the tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27791#issuecomment-376864727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
libcore, liballoc: disable tests in Miri
I am going to run the libcore and liballoc unit test suites in Miri. Not all tests pass. This PR disables a whole bunch of tests when running in Miri, to get us to a baseline from which I can investigate failures.
Cc @SimonSapin @alexcrichton
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid some bounds checks in binary_heap::{PeekMut,Hole}
Fixes #58121.
|
|
This change updates the future and task API as discussed in the stabilization RFC at https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2592.
Changes:
- Replacing UnsafeWake with RawWaker and RawWakerVtable
- Removal of LocalWaker
- Removal of Arc-based Wake trait
|
|
Transition liballoc to Rust 2018
This transitions liballoc to Rust 2018 edition and applies relevant idiom lints.
I also did a small bit of drive-by cleanup along the way.
r? @oli-obk
I started with liballoc since it seemed easiest. In particular, adding `edition = "2018"` to libcore gave me way too many errors due to stdsimd. Ideally we should be able to continue this crate-by-crate until all crates use 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tracking issue FCP to merge: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48656#issuecomment-442372750
|
|
Implement Weak::{strong_count, weak_count}
The counters are also useful on `Weak`, not just on strong references (`Rc` or `Arc`).
In situations where there are still strong references around, you can also get these counts by temporarily upgrading and adjusting the values accordingly. Using the methods introduced here is simpler to do, less error-prone (since you can't forget to adjust the counts), can also be used when no strong references are around anymore, and might be more efficient due to not having to temporarily create an `Rc`.
This is mainly useful in assertions or tests of complex data structures. Data structures might have internal invariants that make them the sole owner of a `Weak` pointer, and an assertion on the weak count could be used to ensure that this indeed happens as expected. Due to the presence of `Weak::upgrade`, the `strong_count` becomes less useful, but it still seems worthwhile to mirror the API of `Rc`.
TODO:
* [X] Tracking issue - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57977
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50158
|
|
Introduce into_raw_non_null on Rc and Arc
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kill remaining uses of mem::uninitialized in libcore, liballoc
Kill remaining uses of mem::uninitialized in libcore and liballoc, and enable a lint that will warn when uses are added again in the future.
To avoid casting raw pointers around (which is always very dangerous because it is not typechecked at all -- it doesn't even get the "same size" sanity check that `transmute` gets), I also added two new functions to `MaybeUninit`:
```rust
/// Get a pointer to the first contained values.
pub fn first_ptr(this: &[MaybeUninit<T>]) -> *const T {
this as *const [MaybeUninit<T>] as *const T
}
/// Get a mutable pointer to the first contained values.
pub fn first_mut_ptr(this: &mut [MaybeUninit<T>]) -> *mut T {
this as *mut [MaybeUninit<T>] as *mut T
}
```
I changed some of the existing code to use array-of-`MaybeUninit` instead of `MaybeUninit`-of-array, successfully removing raw pointer casts there as well.
|
|
|
|
This is needed to properly respect "deny_warnings = false" in config.toml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
