| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
The main change in this patch is removing the use of `Option` inside the
inner loops of those functions to avoid comparisons where one branch
will only trigger on the first pass through the loop.
The included benchmarks go from:
test bench_max ... bench: 372 ns/iter (+/- 118)
test bench_max_by ... bench: 428 ns/iter (+/- 33)
test bench_max_by2 ... bench: 7128 ns/iter (+/- 326)
to:
test bench_max ... bench: 317 ns/iter (+/- 64)
test bench_max_by ... bench: 356 ns/iter (+/- 270)
test bench_max_by2 ... bench: 1387 ns/iter (+/- 183)
Problem noticed in http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/31syce/using_iterators_to_find_the_index_of_the_min_or/
|
|
The main change in this patch is removing the use of `Option` inside the
inner loops of those functions to avoid comparisons where one branch
will only trigger on the first pass through the loop.
The included benchmarks go from:
test bench_max ... bench: 372 ns/iter (+/- 118)
test bench_max_by ... bench: 428 ns/iter (+/- 33)
test bench_max_by2 ... bench: 7128 ns/iter (+/- 326)
to:
test bench_max ... bench: 317 ns/iter (+/- 64)
test bench_max_by ... bench: 356 ns/iter (+/- 270)
test bench_max_by2 ... bench: 1387 ns/iter (+/- 183)
Problem noticed in http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/31syce/using_iterators_to_find_the_index_of_the_min_or/
|
|
Previously it could not be implemented for types outside `libcore/iter.rs` due
to coherence issues.
|
|
In addition to being nicer, this also allows you to use `sum` and `product` for
iterators yielding custom types aside from the standard integers.
Due to removing the `AdditiveIterator` and `MultiplicativeIterator` trait, this
is a breaking change.
[breaking-change]
|
|
This adds the missing methods and turns `str::pattern` in a user facing module, as per RFC.
This also contains some big internal refactorings:
- string iterator pairs are implemented with a central macro to reduce redundancy
- Moved all tests from `coretest::str` into `collectionstest::str` and left a note to prevent the two sets of tests drifting apart further.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/22477
|
|
|
|
CharEq.
|
|
These constants are small and can fit even in `u8`, but semantically they have type `usize` because they denote sizes and are almost always used in `usize` context. The change of their type to `u32` during the integer audit led only to the large amount of `as usize` noise (see the second commit, which removes this noise).
This is a minor [breaking-change] to an unstable interface.
r? @aturon
|
|
Feature-gate unsigned unary negate.
Discussed in weekly meeting here: https://github.com/rust-lang/meeting-minutes/blob/master/weekly-meetings/2015-03-31.md#feature-gate--expr
and also in the internals thread here: http://internals.rust-lang.org/t/forbid-unsigned-integer/752
|
|
Conflicts:
src/libcore/num/mod.rs
|
|
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 979][rfc] which changes the meaning of
the count parameter to the `splitn` function on strings and slices. The
parameter now means the number of items that are returned from the iterator, not
the number of splits that are made.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/979
Closes #23911
[breaking-change]
|
|
const_eval : add overflow-checking for {`+`, `-`, `*`, `/`, `<<`, `>>`}.
One tricky detail here: There is some duplication of labor between `rustc::middle::const_eval` and `rustc_trans::trans::consts`. It might be good to explore ways to try to factor out the common structure to the two passes (by abstracting over the particular value-representation used in the compile-time interpreter).
----
Update: Rebased atop #23841
Fix #22531
Fix #23030
Fix #23221
Fix #23235
|
|
|
|
This is a deprecated attribute that is slated for removal, and it also affects
all implementors of the trait. This commit removes the attribute and fixes up
implementors accordingly. The primary implementation which was lost was the
ability to compare `&[T]` and `Vec<T>` (in that order).
This change also modifies the `assert_eq!` macro to not consider both directions
of equality, only the one given in the left/right forms to the macro. This
modification is motivated due to the fact that `&[T] == Vec<T>` no longer
compiles, causing hundreds of errors in unit tests in the standard library (and
likely throughout the community as well).
Closes #19470
[breaking-change]
|
|
This commit cleans out a large amount of deprecated APIs from the standard
library and some of the facade crates as well, updating all users in the
compiler and in tests as it goes along.
|
|
This is a deprecated attribute that is slated for removal, and it also affects
all implementors of the trait. This commit removes the attribute and fixes up
implementors accordingly. The primary implementation which was lost was the
ability to compare `&[T]` and `Vec<T>` (in that order).
This change also modifies the `assert_eq!` macro to not consider both directions
of equality, only the one given in the left/right forms to the macro. This
modification is motivated due to the fact that `&[T] == Vec<T>` no longer
compiles, causing hundreds of errors in unit tests in the standard library (and
likely throughout the community as well).
cc #19470
[breaking-change]
|
|
This functions swaps the order of arguments to a few functions that previously
took (output, input) parameters, but now take (input, output) parameters (in
that order).
The affected functions are:
* ptr::copy
* ptr::copy_nonoverlapping
* slice::bytes::copy_memory
* intrinsics::copy
* intrinsics::copy_nonoverlapping
Closes #22890
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
The collections debug helpers no longer prefix output with the
collection name, in line with the current conventions for Debug
implementations. Implementations that want to preserve the current
behavior can simply add a `try!(write!(fmt, "TypeName "));` at the
beginning of the `fmt` method.
[breaking-change]
|
|
Conflicts:
src/test/run-pass/issue-13027.rs
|
|
Until some backwards-compatibility hazards are fixed in #23121,
these need to be unstable.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
Now that support has been removed, all lingering use cases are renamed.
|
|
This permits all coercions to be performed in casts, but adds lints to warn in those cases.
Part of this patch moves cast checking to a later stage of type checking. We acquire obligations to check casts as part of type checking where we previously checked them. Once we have type checked a function or module, then we check any cast obligations which have been acquired. That means we have more type information available to check casts (this was crucial to making coercions work properly in place of some casts), but it means that casts cannot feed input into type inference.
[breaking change]
* Adds two new lints for trivial casts and trivial numeric casts, these are warn by default, but can cause errors if you build with warnings as errors. Previously, trivial numeric casts and casts to trait objects were allowed.
* The unused casts lint has gone.
* Interactions between casting and type inference have changed in subtle ways. Two ways this might manifest are:
- You may need to 'direct' casts more with extra type information, for example, in some cases where `foo as _ as T` succeeded, you may now need to specify the type for `_`
- Casts do not influence inference of integer types. E.g., the following used to type check:
```
let x = 42;
let y = &x as *const u32;
```
Because the cast would inform inference that `x` must have type `u32`. This no longer applies and the compiler will fallback to `i32` for `x` and thus there will be a type error in the cast. The solution is to add more type information:
```
let x: u32 = 42;
let y = &x as *const u32;
```
|
|
The method with which backwards compatibility was retained ended up leading to
documentation that rustdoc didn't handle well and largely ended up confusing.
|
|
Conflicts:
src/compiletest/compiletest.rs
src/libcollections/lib.rs
src/librustc_back/lib.rs
src/libserialize/lib.rs
src/libstd/lib.rs
src/libtest/lib.rs
src/test/run-make/rustdoc-default-impl/foo.rs
src/test/run-pass/env-home-dir.rs
|
|
possible blanket impls and also triggers internal overflow. Add some
special cases for common uses (&&str, &String) for now; bounds-targeting
deref coercions are probably the right longer term answer.
|
|
|
|
The method with which backwards compatibility was retained ended up leading to
documentation that rustdoc didn't handle well and largely ended up confusing.
|
|
This commit removes the reexports of `old_io` traits as well as `old_path` types
and traits from the prelude. This functionality is now all deprecated and needs
to be removed to make way for other functionality like `Seek` in the `std::io`
module (currently reexported as `NewSeek` in the io prelude).
Closes #23377
Closes #23378
|
|
r? @alexcrichton
Conflicts:
src/test/run-pass/test-fn-signature-verification-for-explicit-return-type.rs
|
|
|
|
This commit deprecates the `count`, `range` and `range_step` functions
in `iter`, in favor of range notation. To recover all existing
functionality, a new `step_by` adapter is provided directly on `ops::Range`
and `ops::RangeFrom`.
[breaking-change]
|
|
I've made some minor changes from the implementation attached to the RFC to try to minimize codegen. The methods now take `&Debug` trait objects rather than being parameterized and there are inlined stub methods that call to non-inlined methods to do the work.
r? @alexcrichton
cc @huonw for the `derive(Debug)` changes.
|
|
|
|
This commit performs another pass over the `std::char` module for stabilization.
Some minor cleanup is performed such as migrating documentation from libcore to
libunicode (where the `std`-facing trait resides) as well as a slight
reorganiation in libunicode itself. Otherwise, the stability modifications made
are:
* `char::from_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::is_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::to_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::to_{lower,upper}case` are now stable after being modified to return
an iterator over characters. While the implementation today has not changed
this should allow us to implement the full set of case conversions in unicode
where some characters can map to multiple when doing an upper or lower case
mapping.
* `StrExt::to_{lower,upper}case` was added as unstable for a convenience of not
having to worry about characters expanding to more characters when you just
want the whole string to get into upper or lower case.
This is a breaking change due to the change in the signatures of the
`CharExt::to_{upper,lower}case` methods. Code can be updated to use functions
like `flat_map` or `collect` to handle the difference.
[breaking-change]
Closes #20333
|
|
This commit performs another pass over the `std::char` module for stabilization.
Some minor cleanup is performed such as migrating documentation from libcore to
libunicode (where the `std`-facing trait resides) as well as a slight
reorganiation in libunicode itself. Otherwise, the stability modifications made
are:
* `char::from_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::is_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::to_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::to_{lower,upper}case` are now stable after being modified to return
an iterator over characters. While the implementation today has not changed
this should allow us to implement the full set of case conversions in unicode
where some characters can map to multiple when doing an upper or lower case
mapping.
* `StrExt::to_{lower,upper}case` was added as unstable for a convenience of not
having to worry about characters expanding to more characters when you just
want the whole string to get into upper or lower case.
This is a breaking change due to the change in the signatures of the
`CharExt::to_{upper,lower}case` methods. Code can be updated to use functions
like `flat_map` or `collect` to handle the difference.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many of the modifications putting in `Box::new` calls also include a
pointer to Issue 22405, which tracks going back to `box <expr>` if
possible in the future.
(Still tried to use `Box<_>` where it sufficed; thus some tests still
have `box_syntax` enabled, as they use a mix of `box` and `Box::new`.)
Precursor for overloaded-`box` and placement-`in`; see Issue 22181.
|
|
This is the kind of change that one is expected to need to make to
accommodate overloaded-`box`.
----
Note that this is not *all* of the changes necessary to accommodate
Issue 22181. It is merely the subset of those cases where there was
already a let-binding in place that made it easy to add the necesasry
type ascription.
(For unnamed intermediate `Box` values, one must go down a different
route; `Box::new` is the option that maximizes portability, but has
potential inefficiency depending on whether the call is inlined.)
----
There is one place worth note, `run-pass/coerce-match.rs`, where I
used an ugly form of `Box<_>` type ascription where I would have
preferred to use `Box::new` to accommodate overloaded-`box`. I
deliberately did not use `Box::new` here, because that is already done
in coerce-match-calls.rs.
----
Precursor for overloaded-`box` and placement-`in`; see Issue 22181.
|
|
Rebase and follow-through on work done by @cmr and @aatch.
Implements most of rust-lang/rfcs#560. Errors encountered from the checks during building were fixed.
The checks for division, remainder and bit-shifting have not been implemented yet.
See also PR #20795
cc @Aatch ; cc @nikomatsakis
|
|
* `core::num`: adjust `UnsignedInt::is_power_of_two`,
`UnsignedInt::next_power_of_two`, `Int::pow`.
In particular for `Int::pow`: (1.) do not panic when `base`
overflows if `acc` never observes the overflowed `base`, and (2.)
if `acc` does observe the overflowed `base`, make sure we only
panic if we would have otherwise (e.g. during a computation of
`base * base`).
* also in `core::num`: avoid underflow during computation of `uint::MAX`.
* `std::num`: adjust tests `uint::test_uint_from_str_overflow`,
`uint::test_uint_to_str_overflow`, `strconv`
* `coretest::num`: adjust `test::test_int_from_str_overflow`.
|
|
This changes the type of some public constants/statics in libunicode.
Notably some `&'static &'static [(char, char)]` have changed
to `&'static [(char, char)]`. The regexp crate seems to be the
sole user of these, yet this is technically a [breaking-change]
|
