| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Initial support for aarch64-linux-android (#18920)
- Add new configuration files
- Modify some options to compile & link succesfully.
(PIE, disable tls on jemalloc, modify some external function linkage, ..)
- To build, refer to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/wiki/Doc-building-for-android.
(tested with platform=21 and toolchain=aarch64-linux-android-4.9)
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Peter Atashian <retep998@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch fixes IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP problem described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/20381
I've tested on my ProbeR project, everything seems ok.
|
|
Lets them build with the -dev, -nightly, or snapshot compiler
|
|
Fixes #19245.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Better iOS support
Reviewed-by: alexcrichton
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/test/compile-fail/borrowck-move-out-of-overloaded-auto-deref.rs
src/test/compile-fail/issue-2590.rs
src/test/compile-fail/lint-stability.rs
src/test/compile-fail/slice-mut-2.rs
src/test/compile-fail/std-uncopyable-atomics.rs
|
|
This adds the int_uint feature to *every* library, whether or not it
needs it.
|
|
This gets rid of the 'experimental' level, removes the non-staged_api
case (i.e. stability levels for out-of-tree crates), and lets the
staged_api attributes use 'unstable' and 'deprecated' lints.
This makes the transition period to the full feature staging design
a bit nicer.
|
|
Conflicts:
src/libserialize/lib.rs
|
|
This partially implements the feature staging described in the
[release channel RFC][rc]. It does not yet fully conform to the RFC as
written, but does accomplish its goals sufficiently for the 1.0 alpha
release.
It has three primary user-visible effects:
* On the nightly channel, use of unstable APIs generates a warning.
* On the beta channel, use of unstable APIs generates a warning.
* On the beta channel, use of feature gates generates a warning.
Code that does not trigger these warnings is considered 'stable',
modulo pre-1.0 bugs.
Disabling the warnings for unstable APIs continues to be done in the
existing (i.e. old) style, via `#[allow(...)]`, not that specified in
the RFC. I deem this marginally acceptable since any code that must do
this is not using the stable dialect of Rust.
Use of feature gates is itself gated with the new 'unstable_features'
lint, on nightly set to 'allow', and on beta 'warn'.
The attribute scheme used here corresponds to an older version of the
RFC, with the `#[staged_api]` crate attribute toggling the staging
behavior of the stability attributes, but the user impact is only
in-tree so I'm not concerned about having to make design changes later
(and I may ultimately prefer the scheme here after all, with the
`#[staged_api]` crate attribute).
Since the Rust codebase itself makes use of unstable features the
compiler and build system to a midly elaborate dance to allow it to
bootstrap while disobeying these lints (which would otherwise be
errors because Rust builds with `-D warnings`).
This patch includes one significant hack that causes a
regression. Because the `format_args!` macro emits calls to unstable
APIs it would trigger the lint. I added a hack to the lint to make it
not trigger, but this in turn causes arguments to `println!` not to be
checked for feature gates. I don't presently understand macro
expansion well enough to fix. This is bug #20661.
Closes #16678
[rc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0507-release-channels.md
|
|
|
|
This commit prepares the liblibc library to be moved to crates.io. Unlike the
log, serialize, term, etc crates, the source for this crate will *not* be
duplicated out-of-tree. Instead a new rust-lang/libc repository will be created
with a submodule to this repository and it will use the source directly.
In order to compile within the stable ecosystem of Rust, this crate cannot link
to libcore, and it also needs some tweaks for the other attributes that it has.
As a result this commit tweaks the source of the crate to link to libcore when
built in tree but link to libstd when built via cargo.
Note that the rust-lang/libc crate isn't quite prepared just yet, there's a
Cargo bug or two that I'd like to iron out before publishing it. This is simply
preparing the in-tree source.
|
|
Conflicts:
src/libcore/array.rs
src/libcore/cell.rs
src/libcore/prelude.rs
src/libstd/path/posix.rs
src/libstd/prelude/v1.rs
src/test/compile-fail/dst-sized-trait-param.rs
|
|
Conflicts:
src/librbml/lib.rs
src/libserialize/json_stage0.rs
src/libserialize/serialize_stage0.rs
src/libsyntax/ast.rs
src/libsyntax/ext/deriving/generic/mod.rs
src/libsyntax/parse/token.rs
|
|
|
|
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
Adds AArch64 knowledge to:
* configure,
* make files,
* sources,
* tests, and
* documentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This change makes the compiler no longer infer whether types (structures
and enumerations) implement the `Copy` trait (and thus are implicitly
copyable). Rather, you must implement `Copy` yourself via `impl Copy for
MyType {}`.
A new warning has been added, `missing_copy_implementations`, to warn
you if a non-generic public type has been added that could have
implemented `Copy` but didn't.
For convenience, you may *temporarily* opt out of this behavior by using
`#![feature(opt_out_copy)]`. Note though that this feature gate will never be
accepted and will be removed by the time that 1.0 is released, so you should
transition your code away from using it.
This breaks code like:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
Change this code to:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
impl Copy for Point2D {}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
This is the backwards-incompatible part of #13231.
Part of RFC #3.
[breaking-change]
|
|
include <unistd.h>
pid_t getsid(pid_t pid);
CONFORMING TO
SVr4, POSIX.1-2001.
Signed-off-by: NODA, Kai <nodakai@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Sister pull request of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/19288, but
for the other style of block doc comment.
|
|
This is considered good convention.
|
|
|
|
This breaks code that referred to variant names in the same namespace as
their enum. Reexport the variants in the old location or alter code to
refer to the new locations:
```
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = A;
}
```
=>
```
pub use self::Foo::{A, B};
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = A;
}
```
or
```
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = Foo::A;
}
```
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
Closes #17075
I don't know if this is correct. The easiest way to find out is to run the following program on all targets but I can't do it myself.
```c
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
if (sizeof(intmax_t) != 8) {
puts("ERROR");
return 1;
}
}
```
|
|
|
|
This change is an implementation of [RFC 69][rfc] which adds a third kind of
global to the language, `const`. This global is most similar to what the old
`static` was, and if you're unsure about what to use then you should use a
`const`.
The semantics of these three kinds of globals are:
* A `const` does not represent a memory location, but only a value. Constants
are translated as rvalues, which means that their values are directly inlined
at usage location (similar to a #define in C/C++). Constant values are, well,
constant, and can not be modified. Any "modification" is actually a
modification to a local value on the stack rather than the actual constant
itself.
Almost all values are allowed inside constants, whether they have interior
mutability or not. There are a few minor restrictions listed in the RFC, but
they should in general not come up too often.
* A `static` now always represents a memory location (unconditionally). Any
references to the same `static` are actually a reference to the same memory
location. Only values whose types ascribe to `Sync` are allowed in a `static`.
This restriction is in place because many threads may access a `static`
concurrently. Lifting this restriction (and allowing unsafe access) is a
future extension not implemented at this time.
* A `static mut` continues to always represent a memory location. All references
to a `static mut` continue to be `unsafe`.
This is a large breaking change, and many programs will need to be updated
accordingly. A summary of the breaking changes is:
* Statics may no longer be used in patterns. Statics now always represent a
memory location, which can sometimes be modified. To fix code, repurpose the
matched-on-`static` to a `const`.
static FOO: uint = 4;
match n {
FOO => { /* ... */ }
_ => { /* ... */ }
}
change this code to:
const FOO: uint = 4;
match n {
FOO => { /* ... */ }
_ => { /* ... */ }
}
* Statics may no longer refer to other statics by value. Due to statics being
able to change at runtime, allowing them to reference one another could
possibly lead to confusing semantics. If you are in this situation, use a
constant initializer instead. Note, however, that statics may reference other
statics by address, however.
* Statics may no longer be used in constant expressions, such as array lengths.
This is due to the same restrictions as listed above. Use a `const` instead.
[breaking-change]
Closes #17718
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/246
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 2288f332301b9e22db2890df256322650a7f3445.
|
|
This crate is largely just one giant header file, so there's no need for any of
these values to actually have a memory location, they're all just basically a
regular #define.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moves the vast majority of builtin bound checking out of type contents and into the trait system.
This is a preliminary step for a lot of follow-on work:
- opt-in builtin types, obviously
- generalized where clauses, because TypeContents has this notion that a type parameter has a single set of builtin kinds, but with where clauses it depends on context
- generalized coherence, because this adds support for recursive trait selection
Unfortunately I wasn't able to completely remove Type Contents from the front-end checking in this PR. It's still used by EUV to decide what gets moved and what doesn't.
r? @pcwalton
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #15279
Signed-off-by: Peter Atashian <retep998@gmail.com>
|
|
r=alexcrichton
I corrected spelling and capitalization errors in comments and strings.
|
|
|
|
|
