about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/libregex
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2014-12-13Deprecate more in-tree libs for crates.ioAlex Crichton-1/+1
This commit deprecates a few more in-tree libs for their crates.io counterparts. Note that this commit does not make use of the #[deprecated] tag to prevent warnings from being generated for in-tree usage. Once #[unstable] warnings are turned on then all external users will be warned to move. These crates have all been duplicated in rust-lang/$crate repositories so development can happen independently of the in-tree copies. We can explore at a later date replacing the in-tree copies with the external copies, but at this time the libraries have changed very little over the past few months so it's unlikely for changes to be sent to both repos. cc #19260
2014-12-13libregex: use unboxed closuresJorge Aparicio-2/+3
2014-12-13libregex: fix fallout in doc testsJorge Aparicio-1/+2
2014-12-13libregex: impl Replacer for FnMut(&Captures) -> String implementorsJorge Aparicio-2/+2
2014-12-13libregex: fix falloutJorge Aparicio-2/+4
2014-12-08librustc: Make `Copy` opt-in.Niko Matsakis-2/+12
This change makes the compiler no longer infer whether types (structures and enumerations) implement the `Copy` trait (and thus are implicitly copyable). Rather, you must implement `Copy` yourself via `impl Copy for MyType {}`. A new warning has been added, `missing_copy_implementations`, to warn you if a non-generic public type has been added that could have implemented `Copy` but didn't. For convenience, you may *temporarily* opt out of this behavior by using `#![feature(opt_out_copy)]`. Note though that this feature gate will never be accepted and will be removed by the time that 1.0 is released, so you should transition your code away from using it. This breaks code like: #[deriving(Show)] struct Point2D { x: int, y: int, } fn main() { let mypoint = Point2D { x: 1, y: 1, }; let otherpoint = mypoint; println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint); } Change this code to: #[deriving(Show)] struct Point2D { x: int, y: int, } impl Copy for Point2D {} fn main() { let mypoint = Point2D { x: 1, y: 1, }; let otherpoint = mypoint; println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint); } This is the backwards-incompatible part of #13231. Part of RFC #3. [breaking-change]
2014-12-06libregex: remove unnecessary `as_slice` callsJorge Aparicio-9/+9
2014-11-27auto merge of #19343 : sfackler/rust/less-special-attrs, r=alexcrichtonbors-1/+0
Descriptions and licenses are handled by Cargo now, so there's no reason to keep these attributes around.
2014-11-26rollup merge of #19287: alexcrichton/issue-19272Alex Crichton-3/+3
At the same time remove the `pub use` of the variants in favor of accessing through the enum type itself. This is a breaking change as the `Found` and `NotFound` variants must now be imported through `BinarySearchResult` instead of just `std::slice`. [breaking-change] Closes #19271
2014-11-26Remove special casing for some meta attributesSteven Fackler-1/+0
Descriptions and licenses are handled by Cargo now, so there's no reason to keep these attributes around.
2014-11-25Deprecate MaybeOwned[Vector] in favor of CowJorge Aparicio-8/+8
2014-11-24std: Export BinarySearchResultAlex Crichton-3/+3
At the same time remove the `pub use` of the variants in favor of accessing through the enum type itself. This is a breaking change as the `Found` and `NotFound` variants must now be imported through `BinarySearchResult` instead of just `std::slice`. [breaking-change] Closes #19272
2014-11-20Rename remaining Failures to PanicSubhash Bhushan-1/+1
2014-11-18rollup merge of #19038: jayelm/fixed-typosJakub Bukaj-1/+1
Baby steps here... Fixed some comments in liblog, libregex, librustc, libstd.
2014-11-17Fix several typos in commentsjmu303-1/+1
liblog, libregex, librustc, libstd
2014-11-17Fallout from deprecationAaron Turon-1/+1
This commit handles the fallout from deprecating `_with` and `_equiv` methods.
2014-11-17Switch to purely namespaced enumsSteven Fackler-1/+14
This breaks code that referred to variant names in the same namespace as their enum. Reexport the variants in the old location or alter code to refer to the new locations: ``` pub enum Foo { A, B } fn main() { let a = A; } ``` => ``` pub use self::Foo::{A, B}; pub enum Foo { A, B } fn main() { let a = A; } ``` or ``` pub enum Foo { A, B } fn main() { let a = Foo::A; } ``` [breaking-change]
2014-11-16Move FromStr to core::strBrendan Zabarauskas-1/+0
2014-11-12Register new snapshotsAlex Crichton-10/+0
2014-11-06rollup merge of #18695 : steveklabnik/gh17023Alex Crichton-1/+2
2014-11-06link to raw string docs in libregex docsSteve Klabnik-1/+2
Fixes #17023
2014-11-06Prelude: rename and consolidate extension traitsAaron Turon-1/+1
This commit renames a number of extension traits for slices and string slices, now that they have been refactored for DST. In many cases, multiple extension traits could now be consolidated. Further consolidation will be possible with generalized where clauses. The renamings are consistent with the [new `-Prelude` suffix](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/344). There are probably a few more candidates for being renamed this way, but that is left for API stabilization of the relevant modules. Because this renames traits, it is a: [breaking-change] However, I do not expect any code that currently uses the standard library to actually break. Closes #17917
2014-11-05Fix fallout of DSTifying PartialEq, PartialOrd, Eq, OrdJorge Aparicio-0/+10
2014-11-04libsyntax: Forbid escapes in the inclusive range `\x80`-`\xff` inPatrick Walton-2/+4
Unicode characters and strings. Use `\u0080`-`\u00ff` instead. ASCII/byte literals are unaffected. This PR introduces a new function, `escape_default`, into the ASCII module. This was necessary for the pretty printer to continue to function. RFC #326. Closes #18062. [breaking-change]
2014-11-01collections: Remove all collections traitsAlex Crichton-5/+5
As part of the collections reform RFC, this commit removes all collections traits in favor of inherent methods on collections themselves. All methods should continue to be available on all collections. This is a breaking change with all of the collections traits being removed and no longer being in the prelude. In order to update old code you should move the trait implementations to inherent implementations directly on the type itself. Note that some traits had default methods which will also need to be implemented to maintain backwards compatibility. [breaking-change] cc #18424
2014-10-31DSTify HashJorge Aparicio-1/+1
- The signature of the `*_equiv` methods of `HashMap` and similar structures have changed, and now require one less level of indirection. Change your code from: ``` hashmap.find_equiv(&"Hello"); hashmap.find_equiv(&&[0u8, 1, 2]); ``` to: ``` hashmap.find_equiv("Hello"); hashmap.find_equiv(&[0u8, 1, 2]); ``` - The generic parameter `T` of the `Hasher::hash<T>` method have become `Sized?`. Downstream code must add `Sized?` to that method in their implementations. For example: ``` impl Hasher<FnvState> for FnvHasher { fn hash<T: Hash<FnvState>>(&self, t: &T) -> u64 { /* .. */ } } ``` must be changed to: ``` impl Hasher<FnvState> for FnvHasher { fn hash<Sized? T: Hash<FnvState>>(&self, t: &T) -> u64 { /* .. */ } // ^^^^^^ } ``` [breaking-change]
2014-10-30rollup merge of #18445 : alexcrichton/index-mutAlex Crichton-9/+9
Conflicts: src/libcollections/vec.rs
2014-10-30rollup merge of #18398 : aturon/lint-conventions-2Alex Crichton-1/+1
Conflicts: src/libcollections/slice.rs src/libcore/failure.rs src/libsyntax/parse/token.rs src/test/debuginfo/basic-types-mut-globals.rs src/test/debuginfo/simple-struct.rs src/test/debuginfo/trait-pointers.rs
2014-10-30collections: Enable IndexMut for some collectionsAlex Crichton-9/+9
This commit enables implementations of IndexMut for a number of collections, including Vec, RingBuf, SmallIntMap, TrieMap, TreeMap, and HashMap. At the same time this deprecates the `get_mut` methods on vectors in favor of using the indexing notation. cc #18424
2014-10-29auto merge of #17894 : steveklabnik/rust/fail_to_panic, r=aturonbors-18/+18
This in-progress PR implements https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/17489. I made the code changes in this commit, next is to go through alllllllll the documentation and fix various things. - Rename column headings as appropriate, `# Panics` for panic conditions and `# Errors` for `Result`s. - clean up usage of words like 'fail' in error messages Anything else to add to the list, @aturon ? I think I should leave the actual functions with names like `slice_or_fail` alone, since you'll get to those in your conventions work? I'm submitting just the code bits now so that we can see it separately, and I also don't want to have to keep re-building rust over and over again if I don't have to :wink: Listing all the bits so I can remember as I go: - [x] compiler-rt - [x] compiletest - [x] doc - [x] driver - [x] etc - [x] grammar - [x] jemalloc - [x] liballoc - [x] libarena - [x] libbacktrace - [x] libcollections - [x] libcore - [x] libcoretest - [x] libdebug - [x] libflate - [x] libfmt_macros - [x] libfourcc - [x] libgetopts - [x] libglob - [x] libgraphviz - [x] libgreen - [x] libhexfloat - [x] liblibc - [x] liblog - [x] libnative - [x] libnum - [x] librand - [x] librbml - [x] libregex - [x] libregex_macros - [x] librlibc - [x] librustc - [x] librustc_back - [x] librustc_llvm - [x] librustdoc - [x] librustrt - [x] libsemver - [x] libserialize - [x] libstd - [x] libsync - [x] libsyntax - [x] libterm - [x] libtest - [x] libtime - [x] libunicode - [x] liburl - [x] libuuid - [x] llvm - [x] rt - [x] test
2014-10-29Rename fail! to panic!Steve Klabnik-18/+18
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221 The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other circumlocutions. Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate out a section describing the "Err-producing" case. We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe. To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead. Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this will work on UNIX based systems: grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g' You can of course also do this by hand. [breaking-change]
2014-10-28Update code with new lint namesAaron Turon-1/+1
2014-10-24regex: The first range in a character class can start with a left bracketPiotr Czarnecki-5/+8
2014-10-24regex: Escaped literals can end rangesPiotr Czarnecki-6/+28
2014-10-24regex: Fix control flow in the parserPiotr Czarnecki-18/+24
2014-10-10auto merge of #17853 : alexcrichton/rust/issue-17718, r=pcwaltonbors-23/+38
This change is an implementation of [RFC 69][rfc] which adds a third kind of global to the language, `const`. This global is most similar to what the old `static` was, and if you're unsure about what to use then you should use a `const`. The semantics of these three kinds of globals are: * A `const` does not represent a memory location, but only a value. Constants are translated as rvalues, which means that their values are directly inlined at usage location (similar to a #define in C/C++). Constant values are, well, constant, and can not be modified. Any "modification" is actually a modification to a local value on the stack rather than the actual constant itself. Almost all values are allowed inside constants, whether they have interior mutability or not. There are a few minor restrictions listed in the RFC, but they should in general not come up too often. * A `static` now always represents a memory location (unconditionally). Any references to the same `static` are actually a reference to the same memory location. Only values whose types ascribe to `Sync` are allowed in a `static`. This restriction is in place because many threads may access a `static` concurrently. Lifting this restriction (and allowing unsafe access) is a future extension not implemented at this time. * A `static mut` continues to always represent a memory location. All references to a `static mut` continue to be `unsafe`. This is a large breaking change, and many programs will need to be updated accordingly. A summary of the breaking changes is: * Statics may no longer be used in patterns. Statics now always represent a memory location, which can sometimes be modified. To fix code, repurpose the matched-on-`static` to a `const`. static FOO: uint = 4; match n { FOO => { /* ... */ } _ => { /* ... */ } } change this code to: const FOO: uint = 4; match n { FOO => { /* ... */ } _ => { /* ... */ } } * Statics may no longer refer to other statics by value. Due to statics being able to change at runtime, allowing them to reference one another could possibly lead to confusing semantics. If you are in this situation, use a constant initializer instead. Note, however, that statics may reference other statics by address, however. * Statics may no longer be used in constant expressions, such as array lengths. This is due to the same restrictions as listed above. Use a `const` instead. [breaking-change] Closes #17718 [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/246
2014-10-09Use the same html_root_url for all docsBrian Anderson-1/+1
2014-10-09Revert "Update html_root_url for 0.12.0 release"Brian Anderson-1/+1
This reverts commit 2288f332301b9e22db2890df256322650a7f3445.
2014-10-09regex: Convert statics to constantsAlex Crichton-23/+38
This require a bit of finesse to work around the changes with libunicode, but nothing too major!
2014-10-07Update html_root_url for 0.12.0 releaseBrian Anderson-1/+1
2014-10-07Put slicing syntax behind a feature gate.Nick Cameron-1/+2
[breaking-change] If you are using slicing syntax you will need to add #![feature(slicing_syntax)] to your crate.
2014-10-07Use slice syntax instead of slice_to, etc.Nick Cameron-5/+5
2014-10-02Revert "Use slice syntax instead of slice_to, etc."Aaron Turon-5/+5
This reverts commit 40b9f5ded50ac4ce8c9323921ec556ad611af6b7.
2014-10-02Revert "Put slicing syntax behind a feature gate."Aaron Turon-2/+1
This reverts commit 95cfc35607ccf5f02f02de56a35a9ef50fa23a82.
2014-10-02Put slicing syntax behind a feature gate.Nick Cameron-1/+2
[breaking-change] If you are using slicing syntax you will need to add #![feature(slicing_syntax)] to your crate.
2014-10-02Use slice syntax instead of slice_to, etc.Nick Cameron-5/+5
2014-09-30librustc: Forbid `..` in range patterns.Patrick Walton-1/+1
This breaks code that looks like: match foo { 1..3 => { ... } } Instead, write: match foo { 1...3 => { ... } } Closes #17295. [breaking-change]
2014-09-24auto merge of #17438 : alexcrichton/rust/string-stable, r=aturonbors-4/+5
# Rationale When dealing with strings, many functions deal with either a `char` (unicode codepoint) or a byte (utf-8 encoding related). There is often an inconsistent way in which methods are referred to as to whether they contain "byte", "char", or nothing in their name. There are also issues open to rename *all* methods to reflect that they operate on utf8 encodings or bytes (e.g. utf8_len() or byte_len()). The current state of String seems to largely be what is desired, so this PR proposes the following rationale for methods dealing with bytes or characters: > When constructing a string, the input encoding *must* be mentioned (e.g. > from_utf8). This makes it clear what exactly the input type is expected to be > in terms of encoding. > > When a method operates on anything related to an *index* within the string > such as length, capacity, position, etc, the method *implicitly* operates on > bytes. It is an understood fact that String is a utf-8 encoded string, and > burdening all methods with "bytes" would be redundant. > > When a method operates on the *contents* of a string, such as push() or pop(), > then "char" is the default type. A String can loosely be thought of as being a > collection of unicode codepoints, but not all collection-related operations > make sense because some can be woefully inefficient. # Method stabilization The following methods have been marked #[stable] * The String type itself * String::new * String::with_capacity * String::from_utf16_lossy * String::into_bytes * String::as_bytes * String::len * String::clear * String::as_slice The following methods have been marked #[unstable] * String::from_utf8 - The error type in the returned `Result` may change to provide a nicer message when it's `unwrap()`'d * String::from_utf8_lossy - The returned `MaybeOwned` type still needs stabilization * String::from_utf16 - The return type may change to become a `Result` which includes more contextual information like where the error occurred. * String::from_chars - This is equivalent to iter().collect(), but currently not as ergonomic. * String::from_char - This method is the equivalent of Vec::from_elem, and has been marked #[unstable] becuase it can be seen as a duplicate of iterator-based functionality as well as possibly being renamed. * String::push_str - This *can* be emulated with .extend(foo.chars()), but is less efficient because of decoding/encoding. Due to the desire to minimize API surface this may be able to be removed in the future for something possibly generic with no loss in performance. * String::grow - This is a duplicate of iterator-based functionality, which may become more ergonomic in the future. * String::capacity - This function was just added. * String::push - This function was just added. * String::pop - This function was just added. * String::truncate - The failure conventions around String methods and byte indices isn't totally clear at this time, so the failure semantics and return value of this method are subject to change. * String::as_mut_vec - the naming of this method may change. * string::raw::* - these functions are all waiting on [an RFC][2] [2]: rust-lang/rfcs#240 The following method have been marked #[experimental] * String::from_str - This function only exists as it's more efficient than to_string(), but having a less ergonomic function for performance reasons isn't the greatest reason to keep it around. Like Vec::push_all, this has been marked experimental for now. The following methods have been #[deprecated] * String::append - This method has been deprecated to remain consistent with the deprecation of Vec::append. While convenient, it is one of the only functional-style apis on String, and requires more though as to whether it belongs as a first-class method or now (and how it relates to other collections). * String::from_byte - This is fairly rare functionality and can be emulated with str::from_utf8 plus an assert plus a call to to_string(). Additionally, String::from_char could possibly be used. * String::byte_capacity - Renamed to String::capacity due to the rationale above. * String::push_char - Renamed to String::push due to the rationale above. * String::pop_char - Renamed to String::pop due to the rationale above. * String::push_bytes - There are a number of `unsafe` functions on the `String` type which allow bypassing utf-8 checks. These have all been deprecated in favor of calling `.as_mut_vec()` and then operating directly on the vector returned. These methods were deprecated because naming them with relation to other methods was difficult to rationalize and it's arguably more composable to call .as_mut_vec(). * String::as_mut_bytes - See push_bytes * String::push_byte - See push_bytes * String::pop_byte - See push_bytes * String::shift_byte - See push_bytes # Reservation methods This commit does not yet touch the methods for reserving bytes. The methods on Vec have also not yet been modified. These methods are discussed in the upcoming [Collections reform RFC][1] [1]: https://github.com/aturon/rfcs/blob/collections-conventions/active/0000-collections-conventions.md#implicit-growth
2014-09-23Deal with the fallout of string stabilizationAlex Crichton-4/+5
2014-09-22librustc: Forbid private types in public APIs.Patrick Walton-4/+1
This breaks code like: struct Foo { ... } pub fn make_foo() -> Foo { ... } Change this code to: pub struct Foo { // note `pub` ... } pub fn make_foo() -> Foo { ... } The `visible_private_types` lint has been removed, since it is now an error to attempt to expose a private type in a public API. In its place a `#[feature(visible_private_types)]` gate has been added. Closes #16463. RFC #48. [breaking-change]