| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Stabilize the copy_closures and clone_closures features
In addition to the `Fn*` family of traits, closures now implement `Copy` (and similarly `Clone`) if all of the captures do.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44490
|
|
In addition to the `Fn*` family of traits, closures now implement `Copy` (and similarly `Clone`) if all of the captures do.
|
|
This commit adds a new attribute to the Rust compiler specific to the wasm
target (and no other targets). The `#[wasm_import_module]` attribute is used to
specify the module that a name is imported from, and is used like so:
#[wasm_import_module = "./foo.js"]
extern {
fn some_js_function();
}
Here the import of the symbol `some_js_function` is tagged with the `./foo.js`
module in the wasm output file. Wasm-the-format includes two fields on all
imports, a module and a field. The field is the symbol name (`some_js_function`
above) and the module has historically unconditionally been `"env"`. I'm not
sure if this `"env"` convention has asm.js or LLVM roots, but regardless we'd
like the ability to configure it!
The proposed ES module integration with wasm (aka a wasm module is "just another
ES module") requires that the import module of wasm imports is interpreted as an
ES module import, meaning that you'll need to encode paths, NPM packages, etc.
As a result, we'll need this to be something other than `"env"`!
Unfortunately neither our version of LLVM nor LLD supports custom import modules
(aka anything not `"env"`). My hope is that by the time LLVM 7 is released both
will have support, but in the meantime this commit adds some primitive
encoding/decoding of wasm files to the compiler. This way rustc postprocesses
the wasm module that LLVM emits to ensure it's got all the imports we'd like to
have in it.
Eventually I'd ideally like to unconditionally require this attribute to be
placed on all `extern { ... }` blocks. For now though it seemed prudent to add
it as an unstable attribute, so for now it's not required (as that'd force usage
of a feature gate). Hopefully it doesn't take too long to "stabilize" this!
cc rust-lang-nursery/rust-wasm#29
|
|
This commit is an implementation of adding custom sections to wasm artifacts in
rustc. The intention here is to expose the ability of the wasm binary format to
contain custom sections with arbitrary user-defined data. Currently neither our
version of LLVM nor LLD supports this so the implementation is currently custom
to rustc itself.
The implementation here is to attach a `#[wasm_custom_section = "foo"]`
attribute to any `const` which has a type like `[u8; N]`. Other types of
constants aren't supported yet but may be added one day! This should hopefully
be enough to get off the ground with *some* custom section support.
The current semantics are that any constant tagged with `#[wasm_custom_section]`
section will be *appended* to the corresponding section in the final output wasm
artifact (and this affects dependencies linked in as well, not just the final
crate). This means that whatever is interpreting the contents must be able to
interpret binary-concatenated sections (or each constant needs to be in its own
custom section).
To test this change the existing `run-make` test suite was moved to a
`run-make-fulldeps` folder and a new `run-make` test suite was added which
applies to all targets by default. This test suite currently only has one test
which only runs for the wasm target (using a node.js script to use `WebAssembly`
in JS to parse the wasm output).
|
|
Convert SerializedDepGraph to be a struct-of-arrays
Fixes #47326
I did not try the "`mem::swap()` to avoid copying the arrays" idea because that would leave the DepGraph in an incorrect state and that doesn't seem like a good idea for me.
r? @michaelwoerister
|
|
Querify WF-checking so it can be cached
r? @michaelwoerister
|
|
Fixes #47326
|
|
Replace many of the last references to readmes
In particular, this removes the dep track readme, so it should not be merged before https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rustc-guide/pull/92
Fix #47935
cc #48478
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
MVP for chalkification
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #46753
|
|
Fixes #46753
|
|
Fixes #46753
|
|
|
|
In particular:
- `fully_normalize_monormophic_ty` => `normalize_erasing_regions`
- `normalize_associated_type_in_env` => `normalize_erasing_regions`
- `fully_normalize_associated_types_in` => `normalize_erasing_regions`
- `erase_late_bound_regions_and_normalize` => `normalize_erasing_late_bound_regions`
|
|
Backed by a canonicalized query. This computes all the types/regions that need
to be live when the destructor runs (i.e., that the dtor may access).
|
|
It is backed by the new `normalize_projection_ty` query, which uses
canonicalization.
|
|
Before, the identifier `X` was also used when generating a pattern
to match against the dep-node. So `Foo(DefId)` would generate a match
pattern like:
match foo {
Foo(DefId) => ...
}
This does not scale to more general types like `&'tcx
Ty<'tcx>`. Therefore, we now require *exactly one* argument (the macro
was internally tupling anyway, and no actual nodes use more than one
argument), and then we can generate a fixed pattern like:
match foo {
Foo(arg) => ...
}
Huzzah. (Also, hygiene is nice.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of #47320
|
|
Part of #47320
|
|
Part of #47320
|
|
Part of #47320
|
|
what it is doing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Start moving to the rustc guide!
r? @nikomatsakis
cc #48478
|
|
|
|
Allow for instantiating statics from upstream crates
This PR makes the infrastructure around translating statics a bit more flexible so that it can also instantiate statics from upstream crates if the need arises. This is preparatory work for a MIR-only RLIBs prototype, where the instantiation of a `static` may be deferred until a leaf crate.
r? @eddyb (feel free to assign to someone else if you're busy)
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit adds a new option to target specifictions to specify that symbols
should be "hidden" visibility by default in LLVM. While there are no existing
targets that take advantage of this the `wasm32-unknown-unknown` target will
soon start to use this visibility. The LLD linker currently interprets `hidden`
as "don't export this from the wasm module" which is what we want for 90% of our
functions. While the LLD linker does have a "export this symbol" argument which
is what we use for other linkers, it was also somewhat easier to do this change
instead which'll involve less arguments flying around. Additionally there's no
need for non-`hidden` visibility for most of our symbols!
This change should not immediately impact the wasm targets as-is, but rather
this is laying the foundations for soon integrating LLD as a linker for wasm
code.
|
|
|
|
rustc: Tweak `#[target_feature]` syntax
This is an implementation of the `#[target_feature]` syntax-related changes of
[RFC 2045][rfc]. Notably two changes have been implemented:
* The new syntax is `#[target_feature(enable = "..")]` instead of
`#[target_feature = "+.."]`. The `enable` key is necessary instead of the `+`
to indicate that a feature is being enabled, and a sub-list is used for
possible expansion in the future. Additionally within this syntax the feature
names being enabled are now whitelisted against a known set of target feature
names that we know about.
* The `#[target_feature]` attribute can only be applied to unsafe functions. It
was decided in the RFC that invoking an instruction possibly not defined for
the current processor is undefined behavior, so to enable this feature for now
it requires an `unsafe` intervention.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2045-target-feature.md
|
|
This is an implementation of the `#[target_feature]` syntax-related changes of
[RFC 2045][rfc]. Notably two changes have been implemented:
* The new syntax is `#[target_feature(enable = "..")]` instead of
`#[target_feature = "+.."]`. The `enable` key is necessary instead of the `+`
to indicate that a feature is being enabled, and a sub-list is used for
possible expansion in the future. Additionally within this syntax the feature
names being enabled are now whitelisted against a known set of target feature
names that we know about.
* The `#[target_feature]` attribute can only be applied to unsafe functions. It
was decided in the RFC that invoking an instruction possibly not defined for
the current processor is undefined behavior, so to enable this feature for now
it requires an `unsafe` intervention.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2045-target-feature.md
|
|
No longer parse it.
Remove AutoTrait variant from AST and HIR.
Remove backwards compatibility lint.
Remove coherence checks, they make no sense for the new syntax.
Remove from rustdoc.
|
|
|
|
Make normalize_and_test_predicates into a query
From #44891.
I'm not real solid on how `dep_graph` stuff works, but if a node is going to have a key (again, not sure how important that is), then the key needs to be `Copy`. So since `normalize_and_test_predicates` only had one out-of-module use, I changed that call site to use a new function, `substitute_normalize_and_test_predicates` which is the query and enables having the arguments be `Copy`. Hopefully this makes sense.
r? @nikomatsakis
and/or @michaelwoerister
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
