| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Sister pull request of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/19288, but
for the other style of block doc comment.
|
|
(Previously, statically identifiable scopes/regions were solely
identified with NodeId's; this refactoring prepares for a future
where that 1:1 correspondence does not hold.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memory usage significantly and opens opportunities for more parallel compilation.
|
|
The forwards compatible parts of #18645, rebased. Converts implicit coercions from `[T, ..n]` to `&[T]` into explicit references.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
naturally carries over to object types.
I wanted to embed an `Rc<TraitRef>`, but I was foiled by the current
static rules, which prohibit non-Sync values from being stored in
static locations. This means that the constants for `ty_int` and so
forth cannot be initialized.
|
|
|
|
This fixes some metadata/AST encoding problems that lead to ICEs. The way this is currently handled will need revisiting if abstract return types are added, as unboxed closure types from extern crates could show up without being inlined into the local crate.
Closes #16790 (I think this was fixed earlier by accident and just needed a test case)
Closes #18378
Closes #18543
r? @pcwalton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bounds like any other "type parameter".
|
|
None of them would break by implementation-defined struct layout, but
one would break with strict lifetime aliasing, and the rest are just
ugly code.
|
|
Always translate the ID into the local crate ID space since
presently the only way to encounter an unboxed closure type
from another crate is to inline once of its functions.
This may need to change if abstract return types are added.
Closes #18543
|
|
Closes #18378. Note that cross-crate unboxed closures are
still unimplemented and will fail to work currently.
|
|
This prevents def IDs with the wrong crate ID from showing up
when using UFCS. Closes #18501
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221
The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when
writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the
possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot
because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak
of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other
circumlocutions.
Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when
operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate
out a section describing the "Err-producing" case.
We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as
an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology
accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe.
To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead.
Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this
will work on UNIX based systems:
grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g'
You can of course also do this by hand.
[breaking-change]
|
|
Closes #17792.
|
|
Spring cleaning is here! In the Fall! This commit removes quite a large amount
of deprecated functionality from the standard libraries. I tried to ensure that
only old deprecated functionality was removed.
This is removing lots and lots of deprecated features, so this is a breaking
change. Please consult the deprecation messages of the deleted code to see how
to migrate code forward if it still needs migration.
[breaking-change]
|
|
- Unify the representations of `cat_upvar` and `cat_copied_upvar`
- In `link_reborrowed_region`, account for the ability of upvars to
change their mutability due to later processing. A map of recursive
region links we may want to establish in the future is maintained,
with the links being established when the kind of the borrow is
adjusted.
- When categorizing upvars, add an explicit deref that represents the
closure environment pointer for closures that do not take the
environment by value. The region for the implicit pointer is an
anonymous free region type introduced for this purpose. This
creates the necessary constraint to prevent unsound reborrows from
the environment.
- Add a note to categorizations to make it easier to tell when extra
dereferences have been inserted by an upvar without having to
perform deep pattern matching.
- Adjust borrowck to deal with the changes. Where `cat_upvar` and
`cat_copied_upvar` were previously treated differently, they are
now both treated roughly like local variables within the closure
body, as the explicit derefs now ensure proper behavior. However,
error diagnostics had to be changed to explicitly look through the
extra dereferences to avoid producing confusing messages about
references not present in the source code.
Closes issue #17403. Remaining work:
- The error diagnostics that result from failed region inference are
pretty inscrutible and should be improved.
Code like the following is now rejected:
let mut x = 0u;
let f = || &mut x;
let y = f();
let z = f(); // multiple mutable references to the same location
This also breaks code that uses a similar construction even if it does
not go on to violate aliasability semantics. Such code will need to
be reworked in some way, such as by using a capture-by-value closure
type.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
This change is an implementation of [RFC 69][rfc] which adds a third kind of
global to the language, `const`. This global is most similar to what the old
`static` was, and if you're unsure about what to use then you should use a
`const`.
The semantics of these three kinds of globals are:
* A `const` does not represent a memory location, but only a value. Constants
are translated as rvalues, which means that their values are directly inlined
at usage location (similar to a #define in C/C++). Constant values are, well,
constant, and can not be modified. Any "modification" is actually a
modification to a local value on the stack rather than the actual constant
itself.
Almost all values are allowed inside constants, whether they have interior
mutability or not. There are a few minor restrictions listed in the RFC, but
they should in general not come up too often.
* A `static` now always represents a memory location (unconditionally). Any
references to the same `static` are actually a reference to the same memory
location. Only values whose types ascribe to `Sync` are allowed in a `static`.
This restriction is in place because many threads may access a `static`
concurrently. Lifting this restriction (and allowing unsafe access) is a
future extension not implemented at this time.
* A `static mut` continues to always represent a memory location. All references
to a `static mut` continue to be `unsafe`.
This is a large breaking change, and many programs will need to be updated
accordingly. A summary of the breaking changes is:
* Statics may no longer be used in patterns. Statics now always represent a
memory location, which can sometimes be modified. To fix code, repurpose the
matched-on-`static` to a `const`.
static FOO: uint = 4;
match n {
FOO => { /* ... */ }
_ => { /* ... */ }
}
change this code to:
const FOO: uint = 4;
match n {
FOO => { /* ... */ }
_ => { /* ... */ }
}
* Statics may no longer refer to other statics by value. Due to statics being
able to change at runtime, allowing them to reference one another could
possibly lead to confusing semantics. If you are in this situation, use a
constant initializer instead. Note, however, that statics may reference other
statics by address, however.
* Statics may no longer be used in constant expressions, such as array lengths.
This is due to the same restrictions as listed above. Use a `const` instead.
[breaking-change]
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/246
|
|
Fixes that unit-like structs cannot be used if they are reexported and
used in another crate. The compiler fails with an ICE, because unit-like
structs are exported as DefFn and the expression `UnitStruct` is
interpreted as function pointer instead of a call to the constructor.
To resolve this ambiguity tuple-like struct constructors are now exported
as CtorFn. When `rustc::metadata::decoder` finds a CtorFn it sets a new
flag `is_ctor` in DefFn to true.
Relevant changes are in `rustc::metadata::{encoder, decoder}` and in
`rustc::middle::ty`.
Closes #12660 and #16973.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change to resolve and update compiler and libs for uses.
[breaking-change]
Enum variants are now in both the value and type namespaces. This means that
if you have a variant with the same name as a type in scope in a module, you
will get a name clash and thus an error. The solution is to either rename the
type or the variant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The implementation essentially desugars during type collection and AST
type conversion time into the parameter scheme we have now. Only fully
qualified names--e.g. `<T as Foo>::Bar`--are supported.
|
|
This is done by adding a new field to the `DefTy` variant of `middle::def::Def`,
which also clarifies an error message in the process.
Closes #16712.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #16992.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
