| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
use `NonZeroU32` in `newtype_index!`macro, change syntax
Various improvements to the `newtype_index!` macro:
- Use `NonZeroU32` so that `Option<T>` is cheap
- More ergonomic helper method, no need to import `Idx` trait all the time
- Improve syntax to use `struct` keyword so that ripgrep works to find type def'n
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50337
I'm curious to see if this passes tests =)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
refactor match guard
This is the first step to implement RFC 2294: if-let-guard. Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51114
The second step should be introducing another variant `IfLet` in the Guard enum. I separated them into 2 PRs for the convenience of reviewers.
r? @petrochenkov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In investigating [an issue][1] with `panic_implementation` defined in an
executable that's optimized I once again got to rethinking a bit about the
`rustc_std_internal_symbol` attribute as well as weak lang items. We've sort of
been non-stop tweaking these items ever since their inception, and this
continues to the trend.
The crux of the bug was that in the reachability we have a [different branch][2]
for non-library builds which meant that weak lang items (and std internal
symbols) weren't considered reachable, causing them to get eliminiated by
ThinLTO passes. The fix was to basically tweak that branch to consider these
symbols to ensure that they're propagated all the way to the linker.
Along the way I've attempted to erode the distinction between std internal
symbols and weak lang items by having weak lang items automatically configure
fields of `CodegenFnAttrs`. That way most code no longer even considers weak
lang items and they're simply considered normal functions with attributes about
the ABI.
In the end this fixes the final comment of #51342
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51342#issuecomment-414368019
[2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/35bf1ae25799a4e62131159f052e0a3cbd27c960/src/librustc/middle/reachable.rs#L225-L238
|
|
add #[panic_handler]; deprecate #[panic_implementation]
r? @SimonSapin
cc #44489
|
|
Fix #50865: ICE on impl-trait returning functions reaching private items
Adds a test case as suggested in #50865, and implements @petrochenkov's suggestion. Fixes #50865.
Impl-trait-returning functions are marked under a new (low) access level, which they propagate rather than `AccessLevels::Reachable`. `AccessLevels::is_reachable` returns false for such items (leaving stability analysis unaffected), these items may still be visible to the lints phase however.
|
|
|
|
oli-obk:dont_you_hate_it_too_when_everything_panics_constantly, r=eddyb
Allow panicking with string literal messages inside constants
r? @eddyb
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51999
we can't implement things like `panic!("foo: {}", x)` right now because we can't call trait methods (most notably `Display::fmt`) inside constants. Also most of these impls probably have loops and conditions, so it's messy anyway.
But hey `panic!("foo")` works at least.
cc @japaric got any test ideas for `#![no_std]`?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ty{Adt|Array|Slice|RawPtr|Ref|FnDef|FnPtr|Dynamic|Closure|Generator|GeneratorWitness|Never|Tuple|Projection|Anon|Infer|Error}
|
|
|
|
Only fetch lib_features when there are unknown feature attributes
An attempt to win back some of the performance lost in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52644#issuecomment-413761127.
cc @nnethercote
|
|
Rollup of 17 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #53030 (Updated RELEASES.md for 1.29.0)
- #53104 (expand the documentation on the `Unpin` trait)
- #53213 (Stabilize IP associated constants)
- #53296 (When closure with no arguments was expected, suggest wrapping)
- #53329 (Replace usages of ptr::offset with ptr::{add,sub}.)
- #53363 (add individual docs to `core::num::NonZero*`)
- #53370 (Stabilize macro_vis_matcher)
- #53393 (Mark libserialize functions as inline)
- #53405 (restore the page title after escaping out of a search)
- #53452 (Change target triple used to check for lldb in build-manifest)
- #53462 (Document Box::into_raw returns non-null ptr)
- #53465 (Remove LinkMeta struct)
- #53492 (update lld submodule to include RISCV patch)
- #53496 (Fix typos found by codespell.)
- #53521 (syntax: Optimize some literal parsing)
- #53540 (Moved issue-53157.rs into src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/)
- #53551 (Avoid some Place clones.)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
|
|
Remove LinkMeta struct
Fixes #53291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Great Generics Generalisation: HIR Followup
Addresses the final comments in #48149.
r? @eddyb, but there are a few things I have yet to clean up. Making the PR now to more easily see when things break.
cc @yodaldevoid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visit all attributes for feature collection
Previously feature attributes were just collected on item-like "things" as well as exported macros and crate attributes. This ignored some places feature attributes could be specified, such as on enum variants.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53391.
|
|
|
|
(old) borrowck cleanup
Primarily moves dataflow code based on CFG to borrowck; this is mostly so we don't forget to delete it once it becomes unused after we fully move to MIR borrowck.
|
|
|
|
rustc: Tweak visibility of some lang items
This commit tweaks the linker-level visibility of some lang items that rustc
uses and defines. Notably this means that `#[panic_implementation]` and
`#[alloc_error_handler]` functions are never marked as `internal`. It's up to
the linker to eliminate these, not rustc.
Additionally `#[global_allocator]` generated symbols are no longer forced to
`Default` visibility (fully exported), but rather they're relaxed to `Hidden`
visibility). This symbols are *not* needed across DLL boundaries, only as a
local implementation detail of the compiler-injected allocator symbols, so
`Hidden` should suffice.
Closes #51342
Closes #52795
|
|
|
|
This commit tweaks the linker-level visibility of some lang items that rustc
uses and defines. Notably this means that `#[panic_implementation]` and
`#[alloc_error_handler]` functions are never marked as `internal`. It's up to
the linker to eliminate these, not rustc.
Additionally `#[global_allocator]` generated symbols are no longer forced to
`Default` visibility (fully exported), but rather they're relaxed to `Hidden`
visibility). This symbols are *not* needed across DLL boundaries, only as a
local implementation detail of the compiler-injected allocator symbols, so
`Hidden` should suffice.
Closes #51342
Closes #52795
|
|
Add errors for unknown, stable and duplicate feature attributes
- Adds an error for unknown (lang and lib) features.
- Extends the lint for unnecessary feature attributes for stable features to libs features (this already exists for lang features).
- Adds an error for duplicate (lang and lib) features.
```rust
#![feature(fake_feature)] //~ ERROR unknown feature `fake_feature`
#![feature(i128_type)] //~ WARNING the feature `i128_type` has been stable since 1.26.0
#![feature(non_exhaustive)]
#![feature(non_exhaustive)] //~ ERROR duplicate `non_exhaustive` feature attribute
```
Fixes #52053, fixes #53032 and address some of the problems noted in #44232 (though not unused features).
There are a few outstanding problems, that I haven't narrowed down yet:
- [x] Stability attributes on macros do not seem to be taken into account.
- [x] Stability attributes behind `cfg` attributes are not taken into account.
- [x] There are failing incremental tests.
|
|
|
|
zackmdavis:dead_code_lint_should_say_2_electric_boogaloo, r=pnkfelix
dead-code lint: say "constructed" for structs
Respectively.
This is a sequel to November 2017's #46103 / 1a9dc2e9. It had been
reported (more than once—at least #19140, #44083, and #44565) that the
"never used" language was confusing for enum variants that were "used"
as match patterns, so the wording was changed to say never "constructed"
specifically for enum variants. More recently, the same issue was raised
for structs (#52325). It seems consistent to say "constructed" here,
too, for the same reasons.
~~While we're here, we can also use more specific word "called" for unused
functions and methods. (We declined to do this in #46103, but the
rationale given in the commit message doesn't actually make sense.)~~
This resolves #52325.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
