| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The methods are now attached to CodegenCx instead of Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moved common enums to common
|
|
Prelude to using associated types in traits rather than type parameters
|
|
Generalized operand.rs#nontemporal_store and fixed tidy issues
Generalized operand.rs#nontemporal_store's implem even more
With a BuilderMethod trait implemented by Builder for LLVM
Cleaned builder.rs : no more code duplication, no more ValueTrait
Full traitification of builder.rs
|
|
Generalized FunctionCx
Added ValueTrait and first change
Generalize CondegenCx
Generalized the Builder struct defined in librustc_codegen_llvm/builder.rs
|
|
|
|
Support for the program data address space option of LLVM's Target Datalayout
This was introduced recently (specifically, for AVR, cc @dylanmckay).
(I came up with this when attempting to run [avr-rust](https://github.com/avr-rust/rust) rebased on the latest [rust-lang](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust) commits. If this requires a different design, some additional discussions, or is not something to pursue right now, I'd be happy to close this PR).
Note that this somewhat overlaps with @DiamondLovesYou's #51576, I think, although the implementation here is significantly simpler: Since the address space applies to _all_ program data, we can just check the pointee's type whenever we create an LLVM pointer type. If it is a function we use the program data address space; if not we use the default address space.
cc @eddyb, who has been reviewing #51576
Ref: https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#data-layout
|
|
of LLVM's Target Datalayout.
https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#data-layout
|
|
If LLVM 7 is used, generate memcpy/memmove with differing
src/dst alignment. I've added new FFI functions to construct
these through the builder API, which is more convenient than
dealing with differing intrinsic signatures depending on the
LLVM version.
|
|
|
|
For now, all of the receivers that we care about are just a newtyped
pointer — i.e. `Box<Self>`, `Rc<Self>`, `Pin<Box<Self>>`, `Pin<&mut
Self>`. This is much simpler to implement in codeine than the more
general case, because the ABI is the same as a pointer. So we add some
checks in typeck/coherence/builtin.rs to make sure that implementors of
CoerceSized are just newtyped pointers. In this commit, we also
implement the codegen bits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The upcoming SIMD support in the wasm target is unique from the other
platforms where it's either unconditionally available or not available,
there's no halfway where a subsection of the program can use it but no
other parts of the program can use it. In this world it's valid for wasm
SIMD args to always be passed by value and there's no need to pass them
by reference.
This commit adds a new custom target specification option
`simd_types_indirect` which defaults to `true`, but the wasm backend
disables this and sets it to `false`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ty{Adt|Array|Slice|RawPtr|Ref|FnDef|FnPtr|Dynamic|Closure|Generator|GeneratorWitness|Never|Tuple|Projection|Anon|Infer|Error}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technically, there are requirements imposed by the LLVM
`AMDGPUTargetMachine` on functions with this ABI (eg, the return type
must be void), but I'm unsure exactly where this should be enforced.
|
|
rustc_codegen_llvm: replace the first argument early in FnType::new_vtable.
Fixes #51907 by removing the vtable pointer before the `ArgType` is even created.
This allows any ABI to support trait object method calls, regardless of how it passes `*dyn Trait`.
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
Store scalar pair bools as i8 in memory
We represent `bool` as `i1` in a `ScalarPair`, unlike other aggregates,
to optimize IR for checked operators and the like. With this patch, we
still do so when the pair is an immediate value, but we use the `i8`
memory type when the value is loaded or stored as an LLVM aggregate.
So `(bool, bool)` looks like an `{ i1, i1 }` immediate, but `{ i8, i8 }`
in memory. When a pair is a direct function argument, `PassMode::Pair`,
it is still passed using the immediate `i1` type, but as a return value
it will use the `i8` memory type. Also, `bool`-like` enum tags will now
use scalar pairs when possible, where they were previously excluded due
to optimization issues.
Fixes #51516.
Closes #51566.
r? @eddyb
cc @nox
|
|
|
|
|
|
We represent `bool` as `i1` in a `ScalarPair`, unlike other aggregates,
to optimize IR for checked operators and the like. With this patch, we
still do so when the pair is an immediate value, but we use the `i8`
memory type when the value is loaded or stored as an LLVM aggregate.
So `(bool, bool)` looks like an `{ i1, i1 }` immediate, but `{ i8, i8 }`
in memory. When a pair is a direct function argument, `PassMode::Pair`,
it is still passed using the immediate `i1` type, but as a return value
it will use the `i8` memory type. Also, `bool`-like` enum tags will now
use scalar pairs when possible, where they were previously excluded due
to optimization issues.
|
|
|
|
remove semicolon -_-
Add rem_bytes to conditional to avoid error when performing mod by 0
Add test file to confirm compilation passes.
Ensure we don't divide or mod by zero in llvm_type. Include test file from issue.
|
|
|
