| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
`DiagnosticInfoInlineAsm::getInstruction` may return a null pointer, so
the instruction shouldn't be blindly unwrapped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rustc: Implement incremental "fat" LTO
Currently the compiler will produce an error if both incremental
compilation and full fat LTO is requested. With recent changes and the
advent of incremental ThinLTO, however, all the hard work is already
done for us and it's actually not too bad to remove this error!
This commit updates the codegen backend to allow incremental full fat
LTO. The semantics are that the input modules to LTO are all produce
incrementally, but the final LTO step is always done unconditionally
regardless of whether the inputs changed or not. The only real
incremental win we could have here is if zero of the input modules
changed, but that's so rare it's unlikely to be worthwhile to implement
such a code path.
cc #57968
cc rust-lang/cargo#6643
|
|
Currently the compiler will produce an error if both incremental
compilation and full fat LTO is requested. With recent changes and the
advent of incremental ThinLTO, however, all the hard work is already
done for us and it's actually not too bad to remove this error!
This commit updates the codegen backend to allow incremental full fat
LTO. The semantics are that the input modules to LTO are all produce
incrementally, but the final LTO step is always done unconditionally
regardless of whether the inputs changed or not. The only real
incremental win we could have here is if zero of the input modules
changed, but that's so rare it's unlikely to be worthwhile to implement
such a code path.
cc #57968
cc rust-lang/cargo#6643
|
|
|
|
Implement optimize(size) and optimize(speed) attributes
This PR implements both `optimize(size)` and `optimize(speed)` attributes.
While the functionality itself works fine now, this PR is not yet complete: the code might be messy in places and, most importantly, the compiletest must be improved with functionality to run tests with custom optimization levels. Otherwise the new attribute cannot be tested properly. Oh, and not all of the RFC is implemented – attribute propagation is not implemented for example.
# TODO
* [x] Improve compiletest so that tests can be written;
* [x] Assign a proper error number (E9999 currently, no idea how to allocate a number properly);
* [ ] Perhaps reduce the duplication in LLVM attribute assignment code…
|
|
|
|
The new git submodule src/llvm-project is a monorepo replacing src/llvm
and src/tools/{clang,lld,lldb}. This also serves as a rebase for these
projects to the new 8.x branch from trunk.
The src/llvm-emscripten fork is unchanged for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add template parameter debuginfo to generic types
This changes debuginfo generation to add template parameters to
generic types. With this change the DWARF now has
DW_TAG_template_type_param for types, not just for functions, like:
<2><40d>: Abbrev Number: 6 (DW_TAG_structure_type)
<40e> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x375): Generic<i32>
<412> DW_AT_byte_size : 4
<413> DW_AT_alignment : 4
...
<3><41f>: Abbrev Number: 8 (DW_TAG_template_type_param)
<420> DW_AT_type : <0x42a>
<424> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0xa65e): T
Closes #9224
|
|
Enable -mergefunc-use-aliases
If the Rust LLVM fork is used, enable the -mergefunc-use-aliases
flag, which will create aliases for merged functions, rather than
inserting a call from one to the other.
A number of codegen tests needed to be adjusted, because functions
that previously fell below the thunk limit are now being merged.
Merging is prevented in various ways now.
I expect that this is going to break something, somewhere, because
it isn't able to deal with aliases properly, but we won't find out
until we try :)
This fixes #52651.
r? @rkruppe
|
|
If the Rust LLVM fork is used, enable the -mergefunc-use-aliases
flag, which will create aliases for merged functions, rather than
inserting a call from one to the other.
A number of codegen tests needed to be adjusted, because functions
that previously fell below the thunk limit are now being merged.
Merging is prevented either using -C no-prepopulate-passes, or by
making the functions non-identical.
I expect that this is going to break something, somewhere, because
it isn't able to deal with aliases properly, but we won't find out
until we try :)
This fixes #52651.
|
|
This changes debuginfo generation to add template parameters to
generic types. With this change the DWARF now has
DW_TAG_template_type_param for types, not just for functions, like:
<2><40d>: Abbrev Number: 6 (DW_TAG_structure_type)
<40e> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x375): Generic<i32>
<412> DW_AT_byte_size : 4
<413> DW_AT_alignment : 4
...
<3><41f>: Abbrev Number: 8 (DW_TAG_template_type_param)
<420> DW_AT_type : <0x42a>
<424> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0xa65e): T
Closes #9224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IntPredicate moved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moved common enums to common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove support for building against LLVM 4
With emscripten removed in #55626, we no longer need to support building against LLVM 4.
|
|
Support memcpy/memmove with differing src/dst alignment
If LLVM 7 is used, generate memcpy/memmove with differing src/dst alignment. I've added new FFI functions to construct these through the builder API, which is more convenient than dealing with differing intrinsic signatures depending on the LLVM version.
Fixes #49740.
|
|
refactor: use shorthand fields
refactor: use shorthand for single fields everywhere (excluding tests).
|
|
|
|
With emscripten removed in #55626, we no longer need to support
building against LLVM 4.
|
|
If LLVM 7 is used, generate memcpy/memmove with differing
src/dst alignment. I've added new FFI functions to construct
these through the builder API, which is more convenient than
dealing with differing intrinsic signatures depending on the
LLVM version.
|
|
While we still have to support LLVM 4.0 for Emscripten, we can
drop checks for LLVM >= 4.0 and < 4.0.
|
|
The DWARF generated for Rust enums was always somewhat unusual.
Rather than using DWARF constructs directly, it would emit magic field
names like "RUST$ENCODED$ENUM$0$Name" and "RUST$ENUM$DISR". Since
PR #45225, though, even this has not worked -- the ad hoc scheme was
not updated to handle the wider variety of niche-filling layout
optimizations now available.
This patch changes the generated DWARF to use the standard tags meant
for this purpose; namely, DW_TAG_variant and DW_TAG_variant_part.
The patch to implement this went in to LLVM 7. In order to work with
older versions of LLVM, and because LLVM doesn't do anything here for
PDB, the existing code is kept as a fallback mode.
Support for this DWARF is in the Rust lldb and in gdb 8.2.
Closes #32920
Closes #32924
Closes #52762
Closes #53153
|
|
This reverts commit 3cc8f738d4247a9b475d8e074b621e602ac2b7be.
|
|
The issue of passing around SIMD types as values between functions has
seen [quite a lot] of [discussion], and although we thought [we fixed
it][quite a lot] it [wasn't]! This PR is a change to rustc to, again,
try to fix this issue.
The fundamental problem here remains the same, if a SIMD vector argument
is passed by-value in LLVM's function type, then if the caller and
callee disagree on target features a miscompile happens. We solve this
by never passing SIMD vectors by-value, but LLVM will still thwart us
with its argument promotion pass to promote by-ref SIMD arguments to
by-val SIMD arguments.
This commit is an attempt to thwart LLVM thwarting us. We, just before
codegen, will take yet another look at the LLVM module and demote any
by-value SIMD arguments we see. This is a very manual attempt by us to
ensure the codegen for a module keeps working, and it unfortunately is
likely producing suboptimal code, even in release mode. The saving grace
for this, in theory, is that if SIMD types are passed by-value across
a boundary in release mode it's pretty unlikely to be performance
sensitive (as it's already doing a load/store, and otherwise
perf-sensitive bits should be inlined).
The implementation here is basically a big wad of C++. It was largely
copied from LLVM's own argument promotion pass, only doing the reverse.
In local testing this...
Closes #50154
Closes #52636
Closes #54583
Closes #55059
[quite a lot]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/47743
[discussion]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44367
[wasn't]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50154
|
|
The issue of passing around SIMD types as values between functions has
seen [quite a lot] of [discussion], and although we thought [we fixed
it][quite a lot] it [wasn't]! This PR is a change to rustc to, again,
try to fix this issue.
The fundamental problem here remains the same, if a SIMD vector argument
is passed by-value in LLVM's function type, then if the caller and
callee disagree on target features a miscompile happens. We solve this
by never passing SIMD vectors by-value, but LLVM will still thwart us
with its argument promotion pass to promote by-ref SIMD arguments to
by-val SIMD arguments.
This commit is an attempt to thwart LLVM thwarting us. We, just before
codegen, will take yet another look at the LLVM module and demote any
by-value SIMD arguments we see. This is a very manual attempt by us to
ensure the codegen for a module keeps working, and it unfortunately is
likely producing suboptimal code, even in release mode. The saving grace
for this, in theory, is that if SIMD types are passed by-value across
a boundary in release mode it's pretty unlikely to be performance
sensitive (as it's already doing a load/store, and otherwise
perf-sensitive bits should be inlined).
The implementation here is basically a big wad of C++. It was largely
copied from LLVM's own argument promotion pass, only doing the reverse.
In local testing this...
Closes #50154
Closes #52636
Closes #54583
Closes #55059
[quite a lot]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/47743
[discussion]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44367
[wasn't]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50154
|
|
|
|
Fix LLVMRustInlineAsmVerify return type mismatch
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54918.
r? @rkruppe
cc @levex
|
|
Cleanup the rest of codegen_llvm
- improve common patterns
- convert string literals with `to_owned`
- remove explicit `return`s
- whitespace & formatting improvements
|