| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Make any diagnostic line to have the correct margin to align with the
first line:
```
error: message
--> file.rs:3:20
|
3 | <CODE>
| ^^^^
|
= note: this is a multiline
note with a correct
margin
= note: this is a single line note
= help: here are some functions which might fulfill your needs:
- .len()
- .foo()
- .bar()
= suggestion: this is a multiline
suggestion with a
correct margin
```
|
|
|
|
Make the suggestion list have a correct padding:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> file.rs:3:20
|
3 | let x: usize = "";
| ^^ expected usize, found reference
|
= note: expected type `usize`
= note: found type `&'static str`
= help: here are some functions which might fulfill your needs:
- .len()
- .foo()
- .bar()
```
|
|
Historically this was done to accommodate bugs in lints, but there hasn't been a
bug in a lint since this feature was added which the warnings affected. Let's
completely purge warnings from all our stages by denying warnings in all stages.
This will also assist in tracking down `stage0` code to be removed whenever
we're updating the bootstrap compiler.
|
|
Rename 'librustc_unicode' crate to 'libstd_unicode'.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/26554.
|
|
Now that we've got a beta build, let's use it!
|
|
Fixes #26554.
|
|
|
|
When dealing with multiline spans that span few lines, show the complete
span instead of restricting to the first character of the first line.
For example, instead of:
```
% ./rustc foo.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> foo.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ^ trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
show
```
% ./rustc foo.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> foo.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ________^ starting here...
14 | | y),
| |_____________^ ...ending here: trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
|
|
|
|
This commit is a rewrite of the user-facing interface to the rustbuild build
system. The intention here is to make it much easier to compile/test the project
without having to remember weird rule names and such. An overall view of the new
interface is:
# build everything
./x.py build
# document everyting
./x.py doc
# test everything
./x.py test
# test libstd
./x.py test src/libstd
# build libcore stage0
./x.py build src/libcore --stage 0
# run stage1 run-pass tests
./x.py test src/test/run-pass --stage 1
The `src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py` script is now aliased as a top-level `x.py`
script. This `x` was chosen to be both short and easily tab-completable (no
collisions in that namespace!). The build system now accepts a "subcommand" of
what to do next, the main ones being build/doc/test.
Each subcommand then receives an optional list of arguments. These arguments are
paths in the source repo of what to work with. That is, if you want to test a
directory, you just pass that directory as an argument.
The purpose of this rewrite is to do away with all of the arcane renames like
"rpass" is the "run-pass" suite, "cfail" is the "compile-fail" suite, etc. By
simply working with directories and files it's much more intuitive of how to run
a test (just pass it as an argument).
The rustbuild step/dependency management was also rewritten along the way to
make this easy to work with and define, but that's largely just a refactoring of
what was there before.
The *intention* is that this support is extended for arbitrary files (e.g.
`src/test/run-pass/my-test-case.rs`), but that isn't quite implemented just yet.
Instead directories work for now but we can follow up with stricter path
filtering logic to plumb through all the arguments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cc [`?` tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31436)
|
|
Allows replacing stderr with a buffer from the client.
Also, some refactoring around run_compiler.
|
|
Fix wording for out-of-crate macro error
This fixes the wording of the note for out-of-crate macro errors to fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36469
The previous wording came from older logic in the PR that was replaced without updating the note.
|
|
|
|
Be more specific when type parameter shadows primitive type
When a type parameter shadows a primitive type, the error message
was non obvious. For example, given the file `file.rs`:
```rust
trait Parser<T> {
fn parse(text: &str) -> Option<T>;
}
impl<bool> Parser<bool> for bool {
fn parse(text: &str) -> Option<bool> {
Some(true)
}
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", bool::parse("ok").unwrap_or(false));
}
```
The output was:
```bash
% rustc file.rs
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> file.rs:7:14
|
7 | Some(true)
| ^^^^ expected type parameter, found bool a
|
= note: expected type `bool`
= note: found type `bool`
error: aborting due to previous error
```
We now show extra information about the type:
```bash
% rustc file.rs
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> file.rs:7:14
|
7 | Some(true)
| ^^^^ expected type parameter, found bool a
|
= note: expected type `bool` (type parameter)
= note: found type `bool` (bool)
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Fixes #35030
|
|
When a type parameter shadows a primitive type, the error message
was non obvious. For example, given the file `file.rs`:
```rust
trait Parser<T> {
fn parse(text: &str) -> Option<T>;
}
impl<bool> Parser<bool> for bool {
fn parse(text: &str) -> Option<bool> {
Some(true)
}
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", bool::parse("ok").unwrap_or(false));
}
```
The output was:
```bash
% rustc file.rs
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> file.rs:7:14
|
7 | Some(true)
| ^^^^ expected type parameter, found bool
|
= note: expected type `bool`
= note: found type `bool`
error: aborting due to previous error
```
We now show extra information about the type:
```bash
% rustc file.rs
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> file.rs:7:14
|
7 | Some(true)
| ^^^^ expected type parameter, found bool
|
= note: expected type `bool` (type parameter)
= note: found type `bool` (bool)
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Fixes #35030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wording fixes in error messages
This PR is largely wording fixes to existing PRs that I found going back through the ones that have already been updated. Sometimes seeing the message in context made me think "oh there's a better wording!"
There's one additional fix. This will also prevent the secondary underlining of derive call (since they look like macros to the system in the way I was using):
```
error[E0184]: the trait `Copy` may not be implemented for this type; the type has a destructor
--> src/test/compile-fail/E0184.rs:11:10
|
11 | #[derive(Copy)] //~ ERROR E0184
| ^^^^
| |
| in this macro invocation
```
Is now just:
```
error[E0184]: the trait `Copy` may not be implemented for this type; the type has a destructor
--> src/test/compile-fail/E0184.rs:11:10
|
11 | #[derive(Copy)] //~ ERROR E0184
| ^^^^
```
|
|
Specific error message for missplaced doc comments
Identify when documetation comments have been missplaced in the following places:
* After a struct element:
```rust
// file.rs:
struct X {
a: u8 /** document a */,
}
```
```bash
$ rustc file.rs
file.rs:2:11: 2:28 error: found documentation comment that doesn't
document anything
file.rs:2 a: u8 /** document a */,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
file.rs:2:11: 2:28 help: doc comments must come before what they document,
maybe a comment was intended with `//`?
```
* As the last line of a struct:
```rust
// file.rs:
struct X {
a: u8,
/// incorrect documentation
}
```
```bash
$ rustc file.rs
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 error: found a documentation comment that doesn't
document anything
file.rs:3 /// incorrect documentation
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 help: doc comments must come before what they document,
maybe a comment was intended with `//`?
```
* As the last line of a `fn`:
```rust
// file.rs:
fn main() {
let x = 1;
/// incorrect documentation
}
```
```bash
$ rustc file.rs
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 error: found a documentation comment that doesn't
document anything
file.rs:3 /// incorrect documentation
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 help: doc comments must come before what they document,
maybe a comment was intended with `//`?
```
Fix #27429, #30322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identify when documetation comments have been missplaced in the
following places:
* After a struct element:
```rust
// file.rs:
struct X {
a: u8 /** document a */,
}
```
```bash
$ rustc file.rs
file.rs:2:11: 2:28 error: found documentation comment that doesn't
document anything
file.rs:2 a: u8 /** document a */,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
file.rs:2:11: 2:28 help: doc comments must come before what they document,
maybe a comment was intended with `//`?
```
* As the last line of a struct:
```rust
// file.rs:
struct X {
a: u8,
/// incorrect documentation
}
```
```bash
$ rustc file.rs
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 error: found a documentation comment that doesn't
document anything
file.rs:3 /// incorrect documentation
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 help: doc comments must come before what they document,
maybe a comment was intended with `//`?
```
* As the last line of a `fn`:
```rust
// file.rs:
fn main() {
let x = 1;
/// incorrect documentation
}
```
```bash
$ rustc file.rs
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 error: found a documentation comment that doesn't
document anything
file.rs:3 /// incorrect documentation
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
file.rs:3:5: 3:27 help: doc comments must come before what they document,
maybe a comment was intended with `//`?
```
Fix #27429, #30322
|
|
|
