| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
when we can rely on them being locked in memory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leaving types unerased would lead to 2 types with a different "name"
getting different move-paths, which would cause major brokenness (see
e.g. #42903).
This does not fix any *known* issue, but is required if we want to use
abs_domain with non-erased regions (because the same can easily
have different names). cc @RalfJung.
|
|
Make the "main" constructors of NonZero/Shared/Unique return Option
Per discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27730#issuecomment-303939441.
This is a breaking change to unstable APIs.
The old behavior is still available under the name `new_unchecked`. Note that only that one can be `const fn`, since `if` is currently not allowed in constant contexts.
In the case of `NonZero` this requires adding a new `is_zero` method to the `Zeroable` trait. I mildly dislike this, but it’s not much worse than having a `Zeroable` trait in the first place. `Zeroable` and `NonZero` are both unstable, this can be reworked later.
|
|
|
|
… to protect against UB in the unlikely case that `idx + 1` overflows.
|
|
|
|
Turn `elaborate_drops` and `rustc_peek` implementations into MIR
passes that also live in `rustc_mir` crate.
Rewire things so `rustc_driver` uses the `ElaborateDrops` from
`rustc_mir` crate.
|