| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
Guard against non-monomorphized type_id intrinsic call
This PR checks whether the type is sufficient monomorphized when calling type_id or type_name intrinsics. If the type is not sufficiently monomorphized, e.g. used in a pattern, the code will be rejected.
Fixes #73976
|
|
This commit implements the `unused_generic_params` query, an initial
version of polymorphization which detects when an item does not use
generic parameters and is being needlessly monomorphized as a result.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
|
|
|
|
Make unreachable_unchecked a const fn
This PR makes `std::hint::unreachable_unchecked` a const fn so we can use it inside a const function.
r? @RalfJung
Fixes #53188.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other terms are more inclusive and precise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
add spans to injected coverage counters, extract with CoverageData query
This is the next iteration on the Rust Coverage implementation, and follows PR #73488
@tmandry @wesleywiser
I came up with an approach for coverage spans, pushing them through the Call terminator as additional args so they can be extracted by the CoverageData query.
I'm using an IndexVec to store them in CoverageData such that there can be only one per index (even if parts of the MIR get duplicated during optimization).
If this approach works for you, I can quickly expand on this to build a separate IndexVec for counter expressions, using a separate call that will be ignored during code generation, but from which I can extract the counter expression values.
Let me know your thoughts. Thanks!
r? @tmandry
Rust compiler MCP rust-lang/compiler-team#278
Relevant issue: #34701 - Implement support for LLVMs code coverage instrumentation
|
|
Make `likely` and `unlikely` const, gated by feature `const_unlikely`
This PR also contains a fix to allow `#[allow_internal_unstable]` to work properly with `#[rustc_const_unstable]`.
cc @RalfJung @nagisa
r? @oli-obk
|
|
added regions with counter expressions and counters.
Added codegen_llvm/coverageinfo mod for upcoming coverage map
Move coverage region collection to CodegenCx finalization
Moved from `query coverageinfo` (renamed from `query coverage_data`),
as discussed in the PR at:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73684#issuecomment-649882503
Address merge conflict in MIR instrument_coverage test
The MIR test output format changed for int types.
moved debug messages out of block.rs
This makes the block.rs calls to add coverage mapping data to the
CodegenCx much more concise and readable.
move coverage intrinsic handling into llvm impl
I realized that having half of the coverage intrinsic handling in
`rustc_codegen_ssa` and half in `rustc_codegen_llvm` meant that any
non-llvm backend would be bound to the same decisions about how the
coverage-related MIR terminators should be handled.
To fix this, I moved the non-codegen portion of coverage intrinsic
handling into its own trait, and implemented it in `rustc_codegen_llvm`
alongside `codegen_intrinsic_call`.
I also added the (required?) stubs for the new intrinsics to
`IntrepretCx::emulate_intrinsic()`, to ensure calls to this function do
not fail if called with these new but known intrinsics.
address PR Feedback on 28 June 2020 2:48pm PDT
|
|
Const prop: erase all block-only locals at the end of every block
I messed up this erasure in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73656#discussion_r446040140. I think it is too fragile to have the previous scheme. Let's benchmark the new scheme and see what happens.
r? @wesleywiser
cc @felix91gr
|
|
been touched.
|
|
MIR sanity check: validate types on assignment
This expands the MIR validation added by @jonas-schievink in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72093 to also check that on an assignment, the types of both sides match.
Cc @eddyb @oli-obk
|
|
Co-authored-by: Oliver Scherer <github35764891676564198441@oli-obk.de>
|
|
They are gated by internal feature gate const_likely
|
|
propagation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #72271 (Improve compiler error message for wrong generic parameter order)
- #72493 ( move leak-check to during coherence, candidate eval)
- #73398 (A way forward for pointer equality in const eval)
- #73472 (Clean up E0689 explanation)
- #73496 (Account for multiple impl/dyn Trait in return type when suggesting `'_`)
- #73515 (Add second message for LiveDrop errors)
- #73567 (Clarify --extern documentation.)
- #73572 (Fix typos in doc comments)
- #73590 (bootstrap: no `config.toml` exists regression)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
|
|
A way forward for pointer equality in const eval
r? @varkor on the first commit and @RalfJung on the second commit
cc #53020
|
|
switch_ty is redundant
This field is redundant, but we cannot remove it currently as pretty-printing relies on it (and it does not have access to `mir::Body` to compute the type itself).
Cc @oli-obk @matthewjasper @jonas-schievink
|
|
Make is_freeze and is_copy_modulo_regions take TyCtxtAt
Make is_freeze and is_copy_modulo_regions take TyCtxtAt instead of separately taking TyCtxt and Span. This is consistent with is_sized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first stage of implementing LLVM code coverage
This PR replaces #70680 (WIP toward LLVM Code Coverage for Rust) since I am re-implementing the Rust LLVM code coverage feature in a different part of the compiler (in MIR pass(es) vs AST).
This PR updates rustc with `-Zinstrument-coverage` option that injects the llvm intrinsic `instrprof.increment()` for code generation.
This initial version only injects counters at the top of each function, and does not yet implement the required coverage map.
Upcoming PRs will add the coverage map, and add more counters and/or counter expressions for each conditional code branch.
Rust compiler MCP https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/278
Relevant issue: #34701 - Implement support for LLVMs code coverage instrumentation
***[I put together some development notes here, under a separate branch.](https://github.com/richkadel/rust/blob/cfa0b21d34ee64e4ebee226101bd2ef0c6757865/src/test/codegen/coverage-experiments/README-THIS-IS-TEMPORARY.md)***
|
|
Remove const prop for indirects
This was only used by one mir-opt test and since it causes buggy behavior under `-Zmir-opt-level=2`, it seems like we should remove it.
This was split out from #71946.
Closes #72679
Closes #72372
Closes #72285
|
|
tag/niche terminology cleanup
The term "discriminant" was used in two ways throughout the compiler:
* every enum variant has a corresponding discriminant, that can be given explicitly with `Variant = N`.
* that discriminant is then encoded in memory to store which variant is active -- but this encoded form of the discriminant was also often called "discriminant", even though it is conceptually quite different (e.g., it can be smaller in size, or even use niche-filling).
After discussion with @eddyb, this renames the second term to "tag". The way the tag is encoded can be either `TagEncoding::Direct` (formerly `DiscriminantKind::Tag`) or `TagEncoding::Niche` (formerly `DiscrimianntKind::Niche`).
This finally resolves some long-standing confusion I had about the handling of variant indices and discriminants, which surfaced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72419.
(There is also a `DiscriminantKind` type in libcore, it remains unaffected. I think this corresponds to the discriminant, not the tag, so that seems all right.)
r? @eddyb
|
|
remove visit_terminator_kind from MIR visitor
For some reason, we had both `visit_terminator` and `visit_terminator_kind`. In contrast, for `Statement` we just have `visit_statement`. So this cleans things up by removing `visit_terminator_kind` and porting its users to `visit_terminator`.
|
|
|
|
Addresses feedback from @oli-obk (Thanks!)
|
|
|
|
As suggested in PR feedback:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73011#discussion_r435728923
This allows count_code_region() to be handled like a normal intrinsic so
the InstanceDef::InjectedCode variant is no longer needed.
|
|
This initial version only injects counters at the top of each function.
Rust Coverage will require injecting additional counters at each
conditional code branch.
|
|
|