| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
This initial version only injects counters at the top of each function.
Rust Coverage will require injecting additional counters at each
conditional code branch.
|
|
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #72707 (Use min_specialization in the remaining rustc crates)
- #72740 (On recursive ADT, provide indirection structured suggestion)
- #72879 (Miri: avoid tracking current location three times)
- #72938 (Stabilize Option::zip)
- #73086 (Rename "cyclone" to "apple-a7" per changes in upstream LLVM)
- #73104 (Example about explicit mutex dropping)
- #73139 (Add methods to go from a nul-terminated Vec<u8> to a CString)
- #73296 (Remove vestigial CI job msvc-aux.)
- #73304 (Revert heterogeneous SocketAddr PartialEq impls)
- #73331 (extend network support for HermitCore)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
|
|
Miri: avoid tracking current location three times
Miri tracks the current instruction to execute in the call stack, but it also additionally has two `TyCtxtAt` that carry a `Span` that also tracks the current instruction. That is quite silly, so this PR uses `TyCtxt` instead, and then uses a method for computing the current span when a `TyCtxtAt` is needed. Having less redundant (semi-)global state seems like a good improvement to me. :D
To keep the ConstProp errors the same, I had to add the option to `error_to_const_error` to overwrite the span. Also for some reason this changes cycle errors a bit -- not sure if we are now better or worse as giving those queries the right span. (It is unfortunately quite easy to accidentally use `DUMMY_SP` by calling the query on a `TyCtxt` instead of a `TyCtxtAt`.)
r? @oli-obk @eddyb
|
|
Explain move errors that occur due to method calls involving `self`
When calling a method that takes `self` (e.g. `vec.into_iter()`), the method receiver is moved out of. If the method receiver is used again, a move error will be emitted::
```rust
fn main() {
let a = vec![true];
a.into_iter();
a;
}
```
emits
```
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `a`
--> src/main.rs:4:5
|
2 | let a = vec![true];
| - move occurs because `a` has type `std::vec::Vec<bool>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
3 | a.into_iter();
| - value moved here
4 | a;
| ^ value used here after move
```
However, the error message doesn't make it clear that the move is caused by the call to `into_iter`.
This PR adds additional messages to move errors when the move is caused by using a value as the receiver of a `self` method::
```
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `a`
--> vec.rs:4:5
|
2 | let a = vec![true];
| - move occurs because `a` has type `std::vec::Vec<bool>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
3 | a.into_iter();
| ------------- value moved due to this method call
4 | a;
| ^ value used here after move
|
note: this function takes `self`, which moves the receiver
--> /home/aaron/repos/rust/src/libcore/iter/traits/collect.rs:239:5
|
239 | fn into_iter(self) -> Self::IntoIter;
```
TODO:
- [x] Add special handling for `FnOnce/FnMut/Fn` - we probably don't want to point at the unstable trait methods
- [x] Consider adding additional context for operations (e.g. `Shr::shr`) when the call was generated using the operator syntax (e.g. `a >> b`)
- [x] Consider pointing to the method parent (impl or trait block) in addition to the method itself.
|
|
Check for live drops in constants after drop elaboration
Resolves #66753.
This PR splits the MIR "optimization" pass series in two and introduces a query–`mir_drops_elaborated_and_const_checked`–that holds the result of the `post_borrowck_cleanup` analyses and checks for live drops. This query is invoked in `rustc_interface` for all items requiring const-checking, which means we now do `post_borrowck_cleanup` for items even if they are unused in the crate.
As a result, we are now more precise about when drops are live. This is because drop elaboration can e.g. eliminate drops of a local when all its fields are moved from. This does not mean we are doing value-based analysis on move paths, however; Storing a `Some(CustomDropImpl)` into a field of a local will still set the qualifs for that entire local.
r? @oli-obk
|
|
|
|
Emit an error when incompatible sanitizer are configured through command
line options. Previously the last one configured prevailed and others
were silently ignored.
Additionally use a set to represent configured sanitizers, making it
possible to enable multiple sanitizers at once. At least in principle,
since currently all of them are considered to be incompatible with
others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Querify whether a type has structural equality (Take 2)
Alternative to #72177.
Unlike in #72177, this helper method works for all types, falling back to a query for `TyKind::Adt`s that determines whether the `{Partial,}StructuralEq` traits are implemented.
This is my preferred interface for this method. I think this is better than just documenting that the helper only works for ADTs. If others disagree, we can just merge #72177 with the fixes applied. This has already taken far too long.
|
|
This helper method works for all types, falling back to a query for
`TyKind::Adt`s to determine whether the implement the
`{Partial,}StructuralEq` traits.
|
|
This pass is buggy so I'm disabling it to fix a stable-to-beta
regression.
Related to #73223
|
|
|
|
of the evaluation
|
|
|
|
Track span of function in method calls, and use this in #[track_caller]
Fixes #69977
When we parse a chain of method calls like `foo.a().b().c()`, each
`MethodCallExpr` gets assigned a span that starts at the beginning of
the call chain (`foo`). While this is useful for diagnostics, it means
that `Location::caller` will return the same location for every call
in a call chain.
This PR makes us separately record the span of the function name and
arguments for a method call (e.g. `b()` in `foo.a().b().c()`). This
`Span` is passed through HIR lowering and MIR building to
`TerminatorKind::Call`, where it is used in preference to
`Terminator.source_info.span` when determining `Location::caller`.
This new span is also useful for diagnostics where we want to emphasize
a particular method call - for an example, see
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72389#discussion_r436035990
|
|
Fix more clippy warnings
Fixes more of:
clippy::unused_unit
clippy::op_ref
clippy::useless_format
clippy::needless_return
clippy::useless_conversion
clippy::bind_instead_of_map
clippy::into_iter_on_ref
clippy::redundant_clone
clippy::nonminimal_bool
clippy::redundant_closure
clippy::option_as_ref_deref
clippy::len_zero
clippy::iter_cloned_collect
clippy::filter_next
r? @Dylan-DPC
|
|
Fixes #69977
When we parse a chain of method calls like `foo.a().b().c()`, each
`MethodCallExpr` gets assigned a span that starts at the beginning of
the call chain (`foo`). While this is useful for diagnostics, it means
that `Location::caller` will return the same location for every call
in a call chain.
This PR makes us separately record the span of the function name and
arguments for a method call (e.g. `b()` in `foo.a().b().c()`). This
`Span` is passed through HIR lowering and MIR building to
`TerminatorKind::Call`, where it is used in preference to
`Terminator.source_info.span` when determining `Location::caller`.
This new span is also useful for diagnostics where we want to emphasize
a particular method call - for an example, see
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72389#discussion_r436035990
|
|
Enforce unwind invariants
I had a quick look at #72959. The failure message probably needs to be more detailed but I just wanted to check I got the right idea. I have no idea how to right a test for this either...
r? @jonas-schievink
Resolves #72959 (hypothetically)
|
|
Fixes more of:
clippy::unused_unit
clippy::op_ref
clippy::useless_format
clippy::needless_return
clippy::useless_conversion
clippy::bind_instead_of_map
clippy::into_iter_on_ref
clippy::redundant_clone
clippy::nonminimal_bool
clippy::redundant_closure
clippy::option_as_ref_deref
clippy::len_zero
clippy::iter_cloned_collect
clippy::filter_next
|
|
Closes #72679
Closes #72372
Closes #72285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This isn't sound without validation. We don't want to report errors in case of failure to intern and validate, we just don't want to const prop. Interning and const prop is not built for this, let's not do it until we have a clearer picture on aggregate propagation.
|
|
rename FalseEdges -> FalseEdge
There's just a single false edge in this terminator, not multiple of them.
r? @matthewjasper @jonas-schievink
|
|
Be more careful around ty::Error in generators
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72685
(doesn't close it because it's missing a reproduction to use as a test case)
r? @estebank
|
|
|
|
validate basic sanity for TerminatorKind
r? @jonas-schievink
This mainly checks that all `BasicBlock` actually exist. On top of that, it checks that `Call` actually calls something of `FnPtr`/`FnDef` type, and `Assert` has to work on a `bool`. Also `SwitchInt` cannot have an empty target list.
|
|
InstCombine: Don't optimize `&mut *x` into `x`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72797
|
|
|
|
Make TLS accesses explicit in MIR
r? @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt
cc @RalfJung @vakaras for miri thread locals
cc @bjorn3 for cranelift
fixes #70685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=nikomatsakis
Implement RFC 2585: unsafe blocks in unsafe fn
Tracking issue: #71668
r? @RalfJung cc @nikomatsakis
|
|
|
|
Pass more `Copy` types by value.
There are a lot of locations where we pass `&T where T: Copy` by reference,
which should both be slightly less performant and less readable IMO.
This PR currently consists of three fairly self contained commits:
- passes `ty::Predicate` by value and stops depending on `AsRef<ty::Predicate>`.
- changes `<&List<_>>::into_iter` to iterate over the elements by value. This would break `List`s
of non copy types. But as the only list constructor requires `T` to be copy anyways, I think
the improved readability is worth this potential future restriction.
- passes `mir::PlaceElem` by value. Mir currently has quite a few copy types which are passed by reference, e.g. `Local`. As I don't have a lot of experience working with MIR, I mostly did this to get some feedback from people who use MIR more frequently
- tries to reuse `ty::Predicate` in case it did not change in some places, which should hopefully
fix the regression caused by #72055
r? @nikomatsakis for the first commit, which continues the work of #72055 and makes adding `PredicateKind::ForAll` slightly more pleasant. Feel free to reassign though
|
