| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
parser: Keep current and previous tokens precisely
...including their unnormalized forms.
Add more documentation for them.
Hopefully, this will help to eliminate footguns like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68728#discussion_r373787486.
I'll try to address the FIXMEs in separate PRs during the next week.
r? @Centril
|
|
including their unnormalized forms.
Add more documentation for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
stop using BytePos for computing spans in librustc_parse/parser/mod.rs
Computing spans using logic such as `self.token.span.lo() + BytePos(1)` can cause internal compiler errors like #68730 when non-ascii characters are given as input.
#68735 partially addressed this problem, but only for one case. Moreover, its usage of `next_point()` does not actually align with what `bump_with()` expects. For example, given the token `>>=`, we should pass the span consisting of the final two characters `>=`, but `next_point()` advances the span beyond the end of the `=`.
This pull request instead computes the start of the new span by doing `start_point(self.token.span).hi()`. This matches `self.token.span.lo() + BytePos(1)` in the common case where the characters are ascii, and it gracefully handles multibyte characters.
Fixes #68783.
|
|
The previous commit wrapped `Parser` within a `Cow` for the hot macro
parsing path. As a result, there's no need for the `Cow` within
`Directory`, because it lies within `Parser`.
|
|
|
|
also refactor `FnKind` and `visit_assoc_item` visitors
|
|
|
|
Tweak obligation error output
- Point at arguments or output when fn obligations come from them, or ident when they don't
- Point at `Sized` bound (fix #47990)
- When object unsafe trait uses itself in associated item suggest using `Self` (fix #66424, fix #33375, partially address #38376, cc #61525)
- Point at reason in object unsafe trait with `Self` in supertraits or `where`-clause (cc #40533, cc #68377)
- On implicit type parameter `Sized` obligations, suggest `?Sized` (fix #57744, fix #46683)
|
|
Use `next_point` to avoid ICE
Fixes #68730
r? @estebank (I think you're familiar with that)
|
|
suggestions when possible
|
|
parser: avoid re-wrapping NtItem
r? @petrochenkov
|
|
parser: syntactically allow `self` in all `fn` contexts
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68728.
`self` parameters are now *syntactically* allowed as the first parameter irrespective of item context (and in function pointers). Instead, semantic validation (`ast_validation`) is used.
r? @petrochenkov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggest path separator for single-colon typos
This commit adds guidance for when a user means to type a path, but ends
up typing a single colon, such as `<<Impl as T>:Ty>`.
This change seemed pertinent as the current error message is
particularly misleading, emitting `error: unmatched angle bracket`,
despite the angle bracket being matched later on, leaving the user to
track down the typo'd colon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. invert rustc_session & syntax deps
3. drop rustc_session dep in rustc_hir
|
|
|
|
Avoid ICE in macro's diagnostics
Fixes #68629
r? @estebank
|
|
Shrink `Nonterminal`
These commits shrink `Nonterminal` from 240 bytes to 40 bytes. When building `serde_derive` they reduce the number of `memcpy` calls from 9.6M to 7.4M, and it's a tiny win on a few other benchmarks.
r? @petrochenkov
|
|
This commit adds guidance for when a user means to type a path, but ends
up typing a single colon, such as `<<Impl as T>:Ty>`.
This change seemed pertinent as the current error message is
particularly misleading, emitting `error: unmatched angle bracket`,
despite the angle bracket being matched later on, leaving the user to
track down the typo'd colon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit reduces the size of `Nonterminal` from a 72 bytes to 40 bytes (on
x86-64).
|
|
This commit reduces the size of `Nonterminal` from a whopping 240 bytes
to 72 bytes (on x86-64), which gets it below the `memcpy` threshold.
It also removes some impedance mismatches with `Annotatable`, which
already uses `P` for these variants.
|
|
|
|
Implement `?const` opt-out for trait bounds
For now, such bounds are treated exactly the same as unprefixed ones in all contexts. [RFC 2632](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2632) does not specify whether such bounds are forbidden outside of `const` contexts, so they are allowed at the moment.
Prior to this PR, the constness of a trait bound/impl was stored in `TraitRef`. Now, the constness of an `impl` is stored in `ast::ItemKind::Impl` and the constness of a bound in `ast::TraitBoundModifer`. Additionally, constness of trait bounds is now stored in an additional field of `ty::Predicate::Trait`, and the combination of the constness of the item along with any `TraitBoundModifier` determines the constness of the bound in accordance with the RFC. Encoding the constness of impls at the `ty` level is left for a later PR.
After a discussion in \#wg-grammar on Discord, it was decided that the grammar should not encode the mutual exclusivity of trait bound modifiers. The grammar for trait bound modifiers remains `[?const] [?]`. To encode this, I add a dummy variant to `ast::TraitBoundModifier` that is used when the syntax `?const ?` appears. This variant causes an error in AST validation and disappears during HIR lowering.
cc #67794
r? @oli-obk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clean up some diagnostics by making them more consistent
In general:
- Diagnostic should start with a lowercase letter.
- Diagnostics should not end with a full stop.
- Ellipses contain three dots.
- Backticks should encode Rust code.
I also reworded a couple of messages to make them read more clearly.
It might be sensible to create a style guide for diagnostics, so these informal conventions are written down somewhere, after which we could audit the existing diagnostics.
r? @Centril
|
|
|
|
restore some rustc_parse visibilities for rustfmt
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65495/commits/c189565edc5c9fc516170885b3a3061b936205fb some visibilities were reduced on the parse mod (which now resides in the rustc_parse crate) as part of some refactoring and splitting up of libsyntax. However, rustfmt needs access to a few of those items that are no longer visible.
This restores the visibility on those items rustfmt depends on.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/3903#issuecomment-563596269
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/4009
cc @topecongiro
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add suggestions when encountering chained comparisons
Ideally, we'd also prevent the type error, which is just extra noise, but that will require moving the error from the parser, and I think the suggestion makes things clear enough for now.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65659.
|
|
|
|
Ban `...X` pats, harden tests, and improve diagnostics
Follow up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67258#issuecomment-565656155 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67258#discussion_r357879932.
r? @cramertj @oli-obk
|
|
Also fix a bug with the span passed in `mk_range`.
|