| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
1. When the invalid condition is hit, write out the relevant variables too
2. In compile-fail/parse-fail tests, check for ICE first, so the invalid
error patterns won't mask our ICE output.
|
|
Introduced in #47828 to help track down some bugs, it landed a bit hastily so
this is intended on cleaning it up a bit.
|
|
The following submodules have been updated for a new version of LLVM:
- `src/llvm`
- `src/libcompiler_builtins` - transitively contains compiler-rt
- `src/dlmalloc`
This also updates the docker container for dist-i686-freebsd as the old 16.04
container is no longer capable of building LLVM. The
compiler-rt/compiler-builtins and dlmalloc updates are pretty routine without
much interesting happening, but the LLVM update here is of particular note.
Unlike previous updates I haven't cherry-picked all existing patches we had on
top of our LLVM branch as we have a [huge amount][patches4] and have at this
point forgotten what most of them are for. Instead I started from the current
`release_60` branch in LLVM and only applied patches that were necessary to get
our tests working and building.
The current set of custom rustc-specific patches included in this LLVM update are:
* rust-lang/llvm@1187443 - this is how we actually implement
`cfg(target_feature)` for now and continues to not be upstreamed. While a
hazard for SIMD stabilization this commit is otherwise keeping the status
quo of a small rustc-specific feature.
* rust-lang/llvm@013f2ec - this is a rustc-specific optimization that we haven't
upstreamed, notably teaching LLVM about our allocation-related routines (which
aren't malloc/free). Once we stabilize the global allocator routines we will
likely want to upstream this patch, but for now it seems reasonable to keep it
on our fork.
* rust-lang/llvm@a65bbfd - I found this necessary to fix compilation of LLVM in
our 32-bit linux container. I'm not really sure why it's necessary but my
guess is that it's because of the absolutely ancient glibc that we're using.
In any case it's only updating pieces we're not actually using in LLVM so I'm
hoping it'll turn out alright. This doesn't seem like something we'll want to
upstream.c
* rust-lang/llvm@77ab1f0 - this is what's actually enabling LLVM to build in our
i686-freebsd container, I'm not really sure what's going on but we for sure
probably don't want to upstream this and otherwise it seems not too bad for
now at least.
* rust-lang/llvm@9eb9267 - we currently suffer on MSVC from an [upstream bug]
which although diagnosed to a particular revision isn't currently fixed
upstream (and the bug itself doesn't seem too active). This commit is a
partial revert of the suspected cause of this regression (found via a
bisection). I'm sort of hoping that this eventually gets fixed upstream with a
similar fix (which we can replace in our branch), but for now I'm also hoping
it's a relatively harmless change to have.
After applying these patches (plus one [backport] which should be [backported
upstream][llvm-back]) I believe we should have all tests working on all
platforms in our current test suite. I'm like 99% sure that we'll need some more
backports as issues are reported for LLVM 6 when this propagates through
nightlies, but that's sort of just par for the course nowadays!
In any case though some extra scrutiny of the patches here would definitely be
welcome, along with scrutiny of the "missing patches" like a [change to pass
manager order](rust-lang/llvm@27174447533), [another change to pass manager
order](rust-lang/llvm@c782febb7b9), some [compile fixes for
sparc](rust-lang/llvm@1a83de63c42), and some [fixes for
solaris](rust-lang/llvm@c2bfe0abb).
[patches4]: https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm/compare/5401fdf23...rust-llvm-release-4-0-1
[backport]: https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm/commit/5c54c252db
[llvm-back]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36114
[upstream bug]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36096
---
The update to LLVM 6 is desirable for a number of reasons, notably:
* This'll allow us to keep up with the upstream wasm backend, picking up new
features as they start landing.
* Upstream LLVM has fixed a number of SIMD-related compilation errors,
especially around AVX-512 and such.
* There's a few assorted known bugs which are fixed in LLVM 5 and aren't fixed
in the LLVM 4 branch we're using.
* Overall it's not a great idea to stagnate with our codegen backend!
This update is mostly powered by #47730 which is allowing us to update LLVM
*independent* of the version of LLVM that Emscripten is locked to. This means
that when compiling code for Emscripten we'll still be using the old LLVM 4
backend, but when compiling code for any other target we'll be using the new
LLVM 6 target. Once Emscripten updates we may no longer need this distinction,
but we're not sure when that will happen!
Closes #43370
Closes #43418
Closes #47015
Closes #47683
Closes rust-lang-nursery/stdsimd#157
Closes rust-lang-nursery/rust-wasm#3
|
|
If the original name is uppercase, use camel case. Otherwise, use snake
case.
|
|
Correctly format `extern crate` conflict resolution help
Closes #45799. Follow up to @Cldfire's #45820.
If the `extern` statement that will have a suggestion ends on a `;`, synthesize a new span that doesn't include it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix ICE when use trees have multiple empty nested groups
The issue was caused by an oversight of mine in the original use_nested_groups PR, where different paths were resolved with the same `NodeId` in some cases (such as in `use {{}, {}};`).
Fixes #47673
r? @petrochenkov
|
|
AST/HIR: Add a separate structure for labels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
macro links
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add E0659 for ambiguous names
Still on the tracks of the "no error without error code" road.
|
|
Tweaks to invalid ctor messages
- Do not suggest using a constructor that isn't accessible
- Suggest the appropriate syntax (`()`/`{}` as appropriate)
- Add note when trying to use `Self` as a ctor
CC #22488, fix #47085.
|
|
|
|
Resolves #46137.
|
|
|
|
Make non-found module name optional
No longer uses a magic string for missing or root module.
|
|
r=estebank
Don't include bang in macro replacement suggestion
When we suggest the replacement for a macro we include the "!" in the suggested replacement but the span only contains the name of the macro itself. Using that replacement would cause a duplicate "!" in the resulting code.
I originally tried to extend the span to be replaced by 1 byte in rust-lang/rust#47424. However, @zackmdavis pointed out that there can be whitespace between the macro name and the bang.
Instead, just remove the bang from the suggested replacement.
Fixes #47418
r? @estebank
|
|
No longer uses a magic string for missing or root module.
|
|
|
|
- Properly address Variant Ctors
- Show signature if span of trait method without `self` is not available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When we suggest the replacement for a macro we include the "!" in the
suggested replacement but the span only contains the name of the macro
itself. Using that replacement would cause a duplicate "!" in the
resulting code.
I originally tried to extend the span to be replaced by 1 byte in
rust-lang/rust#47424. However, @zackmdavis pointed out that there can be
whitespace between the macro name and the bang.
Instead, just remove the bang from the suggested replacement.
Fixes #47418
|
|
No longer parse it.
Remove AutoTrait variant from AST and HIR.
Remove backwards compatibility lint.
Remove coherence checks, they make no sense for the new syntax.
Remove from rustdoc.
|
|
Use DefIndex encoding that works better with on-disk variable length integer representations.
Use the least instead of the most significant bit for representing the address space.
r? @eddyb
|
|
macros: improve 1.0/2.0 interaction
This PR supports using unhygienic macros from hygienic macros without breaking the latter's hygiene.
```rust
// crate A:
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! m1 { () => {
f(); // unhygienic: this macro needs `f` in its environment
fn g() {} // (1) unhygienic: `g` is usable outside the macro definition
} }
// crate B:
#![feature(decl_macro)]
extern crate A;
use A::m1;
macro m2() {
fn f() {} // (2)
m1!(); // After this PR, `f()` in the expansion resolves to (2), not (3)
g(); // After this PR, this resolves to `fn g() {}` from the above expansion.
// Today, it is a resolution error.
}
fn test() {
fn f() {} // (3)
m2!(); // Today, `m2!()` can see (3) even though it should be hygienic.
fn g() {} // Today, this conflicts with `fn g() {}` from the expansion, even though it should be hygienic.
}
```
Once this PR lands, you can make an existing unhygienic macro hygienic by wrapping it in a hygienic macro. There is an [example](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46551/commits/b766fa887dc0e4b923a38751fe4d570e35a75710) of this in the tests.
r? @nrc
|
|
length integer encodings.
|
|
Upgrade `log` to `0.4` in multiple crates.
|
|
Support `extern` in paths
Implement the primary alternative to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46613 + https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45771, achieving the same effect without requiring changes to other imports.
Both need to be experimentally evaluated before making further progress.
The PR also adds docs for all these related features into the unstable book.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44660
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
rustc: use {U,I}size instead of {U,I}s shorthands.
`Us`/`Is` come from a time when `us` and `is` were the literal suffixes that are now `usize` / `isize`.
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
These no longer work now that Cargo changes the cwd of rustc while it's running.
Instead use an absolute path that's set by rustbuild.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report an error when resolving non-ident macro path failed
Closes #41719.
Please feel free to bikeshed on the error message.
|
|
|
|
|
