| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
hygiene: Do not treat `Self` ctor as a local variable
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57523
|
|
resolve: Mark extern crate items as used in more cases
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57421
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add some tests for buggy derive helpers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...while still keeping ambiguity errors future-proofing for uniform paths.
This corner case is not going to be stabilized for 1.32 and needs some more general experiments about retrofitting 2018 import rules to 2015 edition
|
|
|
|
Found with `git grep -P '\b([a-z]+)\s+\1\b'`
|
|
resolve: Simplify treatment of ambiguity errors
If we have a glob conflict like this
```rust
mod m1 { struct S; }
mod m2 { struct S; }
use m1::*;
use m2::*;
```
we treat it as a special "ambiguity item" that's not an error by itself, but produces an error when actually used.
```rust
use m1::*; // primary
use m2::*; // secondary
=>
ambiguity S(m1::S, m2::S);
```
Ambiguity items were *sometimes* treated as their primary items for error recovery, but pretty irregularly.
After this PR they are always treated as their primary items, except that
- If an ambiguity item is marked as used, then it still produces an error.
- Ambiguity items are still filtered away when exported to other crates (which is also a use in some sense).
|
|
Do not complain about missing crate named as a keyword
Fix #57198.
|
|
|
|
resolve: Fix one more ICE in import validation
So if you have an unresolved import
```rust
mod m {
use foo::bar;
}
```
error recovery will insert a special item with `Def::Err` definition into module `m`, so other things depending on `bar` won't produce extra errors.
The issue was that erroneous `bar` was overwriting legitimate `bar`s coming from globs, e.g.
```rust
mod m {
use baz::*; // imports real existing `bar`
use foo::bar;
}
```
causing some unwanted diagnostics talking about "unresolved items", and producing inconsistent resolutions like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57015.
This PR stops overwriting real successful resolutions with `Def::Err`s.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57015
|
|
|
|
Implement RFC 2338, "Type alias enum variants"
This PR implements [RFC 2338](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2338), allowing one to write code like the following.
```rust
#![feature(type_alias_enum_variants)]
enum Foo {
Bar(i32),
Baz { i: i32 },
}
type Alias = Foo;
fn main() {
let t = Alias::Bar(0);
let t = Alias::Baz { i: 0 };
match t {
Alias::Bar(_i) => {}
Alias::Baz { i: _i } => {}
}
}
```
Since `Self` can be considered a type alias in this context, it also enables using `Self::Variant` as both a constructor and pattern.
Fixes issues #56199 and #56611.
N.B., after discussing the syntax for type arguments on enum variants with @petrochenkov and @eddyb (there are also a few comments on the [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49683)), the consensus seems to be treat the syntax as follows, which ought to be backwards-compatible.
```rust
Option::<u8>::None; // OK
Option::None::<u8>; // OK, but lint in near future (hard error next edition?)
Alias::<u8>::None; // OK
Alias::None::<u8>; // Error
```
I do not know if this will need an FCP, but let's start one if so.
|
|
|
|
resolve: Fix another ICE in import validation
Imports are allowed to have ambiguous resolutions as long as all of them have same `Def`.
As it turned out, it's possible for different `Module`s to have same `Def` when `extern crate` items are involved.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56596
|
|
resolve: Fix an ICE in import validation
Fixes ICE reported in the comment https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56596#issuecomment-449866807
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolve `$crate`s for pretty-printing at more appropriate time
Doing it in `BuildReducedGraphVisitor` wasn't a good idea, identifiers wasn't actually visited half of the time.
As a result some `$crate`s weren't resolved and were therefore pretty-printed as `$crate` literally, which turns into two tokens during re-parsing of the pretty-printed text.
Now we are visiting and resolving `$crate` identifiers in an item right before sending that item to a proc macro attribute or derive.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix a number of uncovered deficiencies in diagnostics
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix recursion limits
r? @michaelwoerister
|
|
|
|
The present author regrets not thinking of a more eloquent way to do
this.
|
|
Weirdly, we were deciding between a help note and a structured
suggestion based on whether the import candidate span was a dummy—but
we weren't using that span in any case! The dummy-ness of the span
(which appears to be a matter of this-crate vs. other-crate
definition) isn't the right criterion by which we should decide
whether it's germane to mention that "there is an enum variant";
instead, let's use the someness of `def` (which is used as the
`has_unexpected_resolution` argument to `error_code`).
Since `import_candidate_to_paths` has no other callers, we are free to
stop returning the span and rename the function. By using
`span_suggestions_`, we leverage the max-suggestions output limit
already built in to the emitter, thus resolving #56028.
In the matter of message wording, "you can" is redundant (and perhaps
too informal); prefer the imperative.
|
|
proc macros
|
|
|
|
Remove lifetime from Resolver
|
|
Contexually dependent error message for E0424 when value is assigned to "self"
This is an improvement for pull request #54495 referencing issue #54369. If the "self" keyword is assigned a value as though it were a valid identifier, it will now report:
```
let self = "self";
^^^^ `self` value is a keyword and may not be bound to variables or shadowed
```
instead of
```
let self = "self";
^^^^ `self` value is a keyword only available in methods with `self` parameter
```
If anyone has a better idea for what the error should be I'd be happy to modify it appropriately.
|
|
|
|
Ever since we added a Cargo-based build system for the compiler the
standard library has always been a little special, it's never been able
to depend on crates.io crates for runtime dependencies. This has been a
result of various limitations, namely that Cargo doesn't understand that
crates from crates.io depend on libcore, so Cargo tries to build crates
before libcore is finished.
I had an idea this afternoon, however, which lifts the strategy
from #52919 to directly depend on crates.io crates from the standard
library. After all is said and done this removes a whopping three
submodules that we need to manage!
The basic idea here is that for any crate `std` depends on it adds an
*optional* dependency on an empty crate on crates.io, in this case named
`rustc-std-workspace-core`. This crate is overridden via `[patch]` in
this repository to point to a local crate we write, and *that* has a
`path` dependency on libcore.
Note that all `no_std` crates also depend on `compiler_builtins`, but if
we're not using submodules we can publish `compiler_builtins` to
crates.io and all crates can depend on it anyway! The basic strategy
then looks like:
* The standard library (or some transitive dep) decides to depend on a
crate `foo`.
* The standard library adds
```toml
[dependencies]
foo = { version = "0.1", features = ['rustc-dep-of-std'] }
```
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `rustc-std-workspace-core`
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `compiler_builtins`
* The crate `foo` has a feature `rustc-dep-of-std` which activates these
crates and any other necessary infrastructure in the crate.
A sample commit for `dlmalloc` [turns out to be quite simple][commit].
After that all `no_std` crates should largely build "as is" and still be
publishable on crates.io! Notably they should be able to continue to use
stable Rust if necessary, since the `rename-dependency` feature of Cargo
is soon stabilizing.
As a proof of concept, this commit removes the `dlmalloc`,
`libcompiler_builtins`, and `libc` submodules from this repository. Long
thorns in our side these are now gone for good and we can directly
depend on crates.io! It's hoped that in the long term we can bring in
other crates as necessary, but for now this is largely intended to
simply make it easier to manage these crates and remove submodules.
This should be a transparent non-breaking change for all users, but one
possible stickler is that this almost for sure breaks out-of-tree
`std`-building tools like `xargo` and `cargo-xbuild`. I think it should
be relatively easy to get them working, however, as all that's needed is
an entry in the `[patch]` section used to build the standard library.
Hopefully we can work with these tools to solve this problem!
[commit]: https://github.com/alexcrichton/dlmalloc-rs/commit/28ee12db813a3b650a7c25d1c36d2c17dcb88ae3
|
|
|
|
resolve: Reduce some clutter in import ambiguity errors
Noticed in https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/a3pyrw/announcing_rust_131_and_rust_2018/eb8alhi/.
The first error is distracting, but unnecessary, it's a *consequence* of the ambiguity error and appears because one of the ambiguous `actix` modules (unsurprisingly) doesn't have the expected name in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replace usages of `..i + 1` ranges with `..=i`.
Before this change we were using old computer code techniques. After this change we use the new and improved computer code techniques.
|
|
attributes
|
|
Delay gensym creation for "underscore items" (`use foo as _`/`const _`) until name resolution
So they cannot be cloned by macros. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56303 for the discussion.
Mostly fix cross-crate use of underscore items by inverting the "gensyms are lost in metadata" bug as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56303#issuecomment-442464695.
Fix unused import warnings for single-segment imports (first commit) and `use crate_name as _` imports (as specified in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56303#issuecomment-442274118).
Prohibit accidentally implemented `static _: TYPE = EXPR;` (cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/55983).
Add more tests for `use foo as _` imports.
|
|
libsyntax_pos: A few tweaks
|
|
|
|
|
|
`CrateRoot` -> `PathRoot`, `::` doesn't necessarily mean crate root now
`SelfValue` -> `SelfLower`, `SelfType` -> `SelfUpper`, both `self` and `Self` can be used in type and value namespaces now
|
