| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
The emitter already verifies wether a given span note or span label
can be emitted to the output. If it can't, because it is a dummy
span, it will be either elided for labels or emitted as an unspanned
note/help when applicable.
|
|
add applicability to remaining suggestions
Fixes #50723.
I noticed that the suggestion methods on `DiagnosticBuilder` weren't actually deprecated due to #57679. This PR deprecates them properly and fixes the remaining usages.
There's also a PR for clippy at rust-lang/rust-clippy#3667.
|
|
make trait-aliases work across crates
This is rebase of a small part of @alexreg's PR #55994. It focuses just on the changes that integrate trait aliases properly into crate metadata, excluding the stylistic edits and the trait objects.
The stylistic edits I also rebased and can open a separate PR.
The trait object stuff I found challenging and decided it basically needed to be reimplemented. For now I've excluded it.
Since this is really @alexreg's work (I really just rebased) I am going to make it r=me once it is working.
Fixes #56488.
Fixes #57023.
|
|
Use structured suggestion to surround struct literal with parenthesis
|
|
use structured macro and path resolve suggestions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Always calculate glob map but only for glob uses
Previously calculating glob map was *opt-in*, however it did record node id -> ident use for every use directive. This aims to see if we can unconditionally calculate the glob map and not regress performance.
Main motivation is to get rid of some of the moving pieces and simplify the compilation interface - this would allow us to entirely remove `CrateAnalysis`. Later, we could easily expose a relevant query, similar to the likes of `maybe_unused_trait_import` (so using precomputed data from the resolver, but which could be rewritten to be on-demand).
r? @nikomatsakis
Local perf run showed mostly noise (except `ctfe-stress-*`) but I'd appreciate if we could do a perf run run here and double-check that this won't regress performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaccept `extern_in_paths`
Based on completed fcp-close in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55600, this removes `extern_in_path` (e.g. `extern::foo::bar`) from the language. The changes are primarily reversing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/32db83b16e06cb5cca72d0e6a648a8008eda0fac.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55600
r? @petrochenkov
|
|
clarify resolve typo suggestion
Include the kind of the binding that we're suggesting, and use a
structured suggestion.
Fixes #53445.
|
|
|
|
Previously calculating glob map was *opt-in*, however it did record
node id -> ident use for every use directive. This aims to see if we
can unconditionally calculate the glob map and not regress performance.
|
|
hygiene: Do not treat `Self` ctor as a local variable
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57523
|
|
resolve: Mark extern crate items as used in more cases
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57421
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add some tests for buggy derive helpers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...while still keeping ambiguity errors future-proofing for uniform paths.
This corner case is not going to be stabilized for 1.32 and needs some more general experiments about retrofitting 2018 import rules to 2015 edition
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Alexander Regueiro <alexreg@me.com>
|
|
Include the kind of the binding that we're suggesting, and use a
structured suggestion.
|
|
Found with `git grep -P '\b([a-z]+)\s+\1\b'`
|
|
resolve: Simplify treatment of ambiguity errors
If we have a glob conflict like this
```rust
mod m1 { struct S; }
mod m2 { struct S; }
use m1::*;
use m2::*;
```
we treat it as a special "ambiguity item" that's not an error by itself, but produces an error when actually used.
```rust
use m1::*; // primary
use m2::*; // secondary
=>
ambiguity S(m1::S, m2::S);
```
Ambiguity items were *sometimes* treated as their primary items for error recovery, but pretty irregularly.
After this PR they are always treated as their primary items, except that
- If an ambiguity item is marked as used, then it still produces an error.
- Ambiguity items are still filtered away when exported to other crates (which is also a use in some sense).
|
|
Do not complain about missing crate named as a keyword
Fix #57198.
|
|
|
|
resolve: Fix one more ICE in import validation
So if you have an unresolved import
```rust
mod m {
use foo::bar;
}
```
error recovery will insert a special item with `Def::Err` definition into module `m`, so other things depending on `bar` won't produce extra errors.
The issue was that erroneous `bar` was overwriting legitimate `bar`s coming from globs, e.g.
```rust
mod m {
use baz::*; // imports real existing `bar`
use foo::bar;
}
```
causing some unwanted diagnostics talking about "unresolved items", and producing inconsistent resolutions like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57015.
This PR stops overwriting real successful resolutions with `Def::Err`s.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57015
|
|
|
|
Implement RFC 2338, "Type alias enum variants"
This PR implements [RFC 2338](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2338), allowing one to write code like the following.
```rust
#![feature(type_alias_enum_variants)]
enum Foo {
Bar(i32),
Baz { i: i32 },
}
type Alias = Foo;
fn main() {
let t = Alias::Bar(0);
let t = Alias::Baz { i: 0 };
match t {
Alias::Bar(_i) => {}
Alias::Baz { i: _i } => {}
}
}
```
Since `Self` can be considered a type alias in this context, it also enables using `Self::Variant` as both a constructor and pattern.
Fixes issues #56199 and #56611.
N.B., after discussing the syntax for type arguments on enum variants with @petrochenkov and @eddyb (there are also a few comments on the [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49683)), the consensus seems to be treat the syntax as follows, which ought to be backwards-compatible.
```rust
Option::<u8>::None; // OK
Option::None::<u8>; // OK, but lint in near future (hard error next edition?)
Alias::<u8>::None; // OK
Alias::None::<u8>; // Error
```
I do not know if this will need an FCP, but let's start one if so.
|
|
|
|
resolve: Fix another ICE in import validation
Imports are allowed to have ambiguous resolutions as long as all of them have same `Def`.
As it turned out, it's possible for different `Module`s to have same `Def` when `extern crate` items are involved.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56596
|
|
resolve: Fix an ICE in import validation
Fixes ICE reported in the comment https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56596#issuecomment-449866807
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolve `$crate`s for pretty-printing at more appropriate time
Doing it in `BuildReducedGraphVisitor` wasn't a good idea, identifiers wasn't actually visited half of the time.
As a result some `$crate`s weren't resolved and were therefore pretty-printed as `$crate` literally, which turns into two tokens during re-parsing of the pretty-printed text.
Now we are visiting and resolving `$crate` identifiers in an item right before sending that item to a proc macro attribute or derive.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix a number of uncovered deficiencies in diagnostics
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix recursion limits
r? @michaelwoerister
|
|
|
|
The present author regrets not thinking of a more eloquent way to do
this.
|
|
Weirdly, we were deciding between a help note and a structured
suggestion based on whether the import candidate span was a dummy—but
we weren't using that span in any case! The dummy-ness of the span
(which appears to be a matter of this-crate vs. other-crate
definition) isn't the right criterion by which we should decide
whether it's germane to mention that "there is an enum variant";
instead, let's use the someness of `def` (which is used as the
`has_unexpected_resolution` argument to `error_code`).
Since `import_candidate_to_paths` has no other callers, we are free to
stop returning the span and rename the function. By using
`span_suggestions_`, we leverage the max-suggestions output limit
already built in to the emitter, thus resolving #56028.
In the matter of message wording, "you can" is redundant (and perhaps
too informal); prefer the imperative.
|