| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
r=camelid,Manishearth
Display associated types of implementors
Fixes #86631.
Contrary to before, it doesn't display methods. I also had to "resurrect" the `auto-hide-trait-implementations` setting. :3
Only question at this point: should I move the `render_impl` boolean arguments into one struct? We're starting to have quite a lot of them...
cc `@cynecx`
r? `@camelid`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated types don't get bolded, so it looks off to have one kind
bolded and one not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add support for tuple struct field documentation
Fixes #42615.
This is #80320 updated to new codebase and with added tests.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83255.
cc ```@camelid``` (since you were involved on the original PR).
r? ```@jyn514```
|
|
Part of #87059
Partially reverts #84703
Preview at: https://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-test/real-headers/std/index.html
|
|
|
|
Part of #87059
Preview it at: https://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-test/rustdoc-sidebar-header/std/index.html
|
|
fix dead link for method in trait of blanket impl from third party crate
fix #86620
* changes `href` method to raise the actual error it had instead of an `Option`
* set the href link correctly in case of an error
I did not manage to make a small reproducer, I think it happens in a situation where
* crate A expose a trait with a blanket impl
* crate B use the trait from crate A
* crate C use types from crate B
* building docs for crate C without dependencies
r? `@jyn514`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 41a345d4c46dad1a98c9993bc78513415994e8ba.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit adds a test case for generics, re-adds generics data
to the search index, and tweaks function indexing to use less space in JSON.
This reverts commit 14ca89446c076bcf484d3d05bd991a4b7985a409.
|
|
chore(rustdoc): remove unused members of RenderType
PR #86561 removes the only place the `generics` member is read. This PR does even more cleanup.
|
|
Commit e629381653bb3579f0cea0b256e391edef5e8dbb removes the only place
these members variables are actually read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
chore(rustdoc): Remove unused impl block
|
|
Rustdoc's output"
This reverts commit 8a058926ecd6d0988714f8f7a5a31293c533f8c6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=jyn514
fix rustdoc stack overflow on mutually recursive Deref
fix #85095
fix #85037
|
|
Also factor out outer_version and const_outer_version into
render_rightside.
|
|
|
|
This covers rendering of stability_since and the srclink across methods
and trait implementations, so their DOM representation is consistent.
|
|
That means it will be visible under "Implementors" on trait pages, and
under "Implementations" on struct/enum pages, even when all methods are
collapsed.
Switch to a float layout for rightside elements.
|
|
|
|
These were hidden by default, and duplicated information already on the
page anyhow.
Also remove the "Auto-hide trait implementors of a trait" setting,
which is not needed anymore.
|
|
This makes it possible to use Ctrl-F to find methods defined in traits.
|
|
fix #85037
|
|
fix #85095
|
|
Remove must_use from ALLOWED_ATTRIBUTES
This is a fairly common attribute on methods, but is not something you need to know when reading the method docs - the purpose of the attribute is for the compiler to tell you about it if you forget to use a value.
Removing reclaims some valuable space in the summary of methods, particularly when the attribute has a long string value.
As discussed in #84309. Partially addresses #81482.
r? ```@Manishearth```
|
|
rustdoc: revert deref recur to resume inclusion of impl ExtTrait<Local> for ExtType
As discussed here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82465#issuecomment-829290384, Revert PR #80653 to resolve issue #82465.
Issue #82465 was we had stopped including certain trait implementations, namely implementations on an imported type of an imported trait *instantiated on a local type*. That bug was injected by PR #80653.
Reverting #80653 means we don't list all the methods that you have accessible via recursively applying `Deref`.
[Discussion in last week's rustc triage meeting](https://zulip-archive.rust-lang.org/238009tcompilermeetings/19557weekly2021042954818.html#236680594) led us to conclude that the bug was worse than the enhancement, and there was not an obvious fix for the bug itself. So for the short term we remove the enhancement, while in the long term we will work on figuring out a way to have our imported trait implementation cake and eat it too.
|
|
This is a fairly common attribute on methods, but is not something you
need to know when reading the method docs - the purpose of the attribute
is for the compiler to tell you about it if you forget to use a value.
Removing reclaims some valuable space in the summary of methods.
|
|
(update: placated tidy)
(update: rebased post PR #84707 )
merge me
|
|
This allows for a more readable straight-through logic in render_impl
without need for a closure.
|
|
|