about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/libstd/comm
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2014-12-08librustc: Make `Copy` opt-in.Niko Matsakis-0/+2
This change makes the compiler no longer infer whether types (structures and enumerations) implement the `Copy` trait (and thus are implicitly copyable). Rather, you must implement `Copy` yourself via `impl Copy for MyType {}`. A new warning has been added, `missing_copy_implementations`, to warn you if a non-generic public type has been added that could have implemented `Copy` but didn't. For convenience, you may *temporarily* opt out of this behavior by using `#![feature(opt_out_copy)]`. Note though that this feature gate will never be accepted and will be removed by the time that 1.0 is released, so you should transition your code away from using it. This breaks code like: #[deriving(Show)] struct Point2D { x: int, y: int, } fn main() { let mypoint = Point2D { x: 1, y: 1, }; let otherpoint = mypoint; println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint); } Change this code to: #[deriving(Show)] struct Point2D { x: int, y: int, } impl Copy for Point2D {} fn main() { let mypoint = Point2D { x: 1, y: 1, }; let otherpoint = mypoint; println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint); } This is the backwards-incompatible part of #13231. Part of RFC #3. [breaking-change]
2014-12-05Fall out of the std::sync rewriteAlex Crichton-19/+24
2014-12-05std: Rewrite the `sync` moduleAlex Crichton-0/+538
This commit is a reimplementation of `std::sync` to be based on the system-provided primitives wherever possible. The previous implementation was fundamentally built on top of channels, and as part of the runtime reform it has become clear that this is not the level of abstraction that the standard level should be providing. This rewrite aims to provide as thin of a shim as possible on top of the system primitives in order to make them safe. The overall interface of the `std::sync` module has in general not changed, but there are a few important distinctions, highlighted below: * The condition variable type, `Condvar`, has been separated out of a `Mutex`. A condition variable is now an entirely separate type. This separation benefits users who only use one mutex, and provides a clearer distinction of who's responsible for managing condition variables (the application). * All of `Condvar`, `Mutex`, and `RWLock` are now directly built on top of system primitives rather than using a custom implementation. The `Once`, `Barrier`, and `Semaphore` types are still built upon these abstractions of the system primitives. * The `Condvar`, `Mutex`, and `RWLock` types all have a new static type and constant initializer corresponding to them. These are provided primarily for C FFI interoperation, but are often useful to otherwise simply have a global lock. The types, however, will leak memory unless `destroy()` is called on them, which is clearly documented. * The `Condvar` implementation for an `RWLock` write lock has been removed. This may be added back in the future with a userspace implementation, but this commit is focused on exposing the system primitives first. * The fundamental architecture of this design is to provide two separate layers. The first layer is that exposed by `sys_common` which is a cross-platform bare-metal abstraction of the system synchronization primitives. No attempt is made at making this layer safe, and it is quite unsafe to use! It is currently not exported as part of the API of the standard library, but the stabilization of the `sys` module will ensure that these will be exposed in time. The purpose of this layer is to provide the core cross-platform abstractions if necessary to implementors. The second layer is the layer provided by `std::sync` which is intended to be the thinnest possible layer on top of `sys_common` which is entirely safe to use. There are a few concerns which need to be addressed when making these system primitives safe: * Once used, the OS primitives can never be **moved**. This means that they essentially need to have a stable address. The static primitives use `&'static self` to enforce this, and the non-static primitives all use a `Box` to provide this guarantee. * Poisoning is leveraged to ensure that invalid data is not accessible from other tasks after one has panicked. In addition to these overall blanket safety limitations, each primitive has a few restrictions of its own: * Mutexes and rwlocks can only be unlocked from the same thread that they were locked by. This is achieved through RAII lock guards which cannot be sent across threads. * Mutexes and rwlocks can only be unlocked if they were previously locked. This is achieved by not exposing an unlocking method. * A condition variable can only be waited on with a locked mutex. This is achieved by requiring a `MutexGuard` in the `wait()` method. * A condition variable cannot be used concurrently with more than one mutex. This is guaranteed by dynamically binding a condition variable to precisely one mutex for its entire lifecycle. This restriction may be able to be relaxed in the future (a mutex is unbound when no threads are waiting on the condvar), but for now it is sufficient to guarantee safety. * Condvars now support timeouts for their blocking operations. The implementation for these operations is provided by the system. Due to the modification of the `Condvar` API, removal of the `std::sync::mutex` API, and reimplementation, this is a breaking change. Most code should be fairly easy to port using the examples in the documentation of these primitives. [breaking-change] Closes #17094 Closes #18003
2014-11-26Fixup various places that were doing `&T+'a` and do `&(T+'a)`Niko Matsakis-1/+1
2014-11-24Merge libsync into libstdAaron Turon-0/+4642
This patch merges the `libsync` crate into `libstd`, undoing part of the facade. This is in preparation for ultimately merging `librustrt`, as well as the upcoming rewrite of `sync`. Because this removes the `libsync` crate, it is a: [breaking-change] However, all uses of `libsync` should be able to reroute through `std::sync` and `std::comm` instead.
2014-06-11sync: Move underneath libstdAlex Crichton-4567/+0
This commit is the final step in the libstd facade, #13851. The purpose of this commit is to move libsync underneath the standard library, behind the facade. This will allow core primitives like channels, queues, and atomics to all live in the same location. There were a few notable changes and a few breaking changes as part of this movement: * The `Vec` and `String` types are reexported at the top level of libcollections * The `unreachable!()` macro was copied to libcore * The `std::rt::thread` module was moved to librustrt, but it is still reexported at the same location. * The `std::comm` module was moved to libsync * The `sync::comm` module was moved under `sync::comm`, and renamed to `duplex`. It is now a private module with types/functions being reexported under `sync::comm`. This is a breaking change for any existing users of duplex streams. * All concurrent queues/deques were moved directly under libsync. They are also all marked with #![experimental] for now if they are public. * The `task_pool` and `future` modules no longer live in libsync, but rather live under `std::sync`. They will forever live at this location, but they may move to libsync if the `std::task` module moves as well. [breaking-change]
2014-06-10Fix more misspelled comments and strings.Joseph Crail-1/+1
2014-06-08core: Rename `container` mod to `collections`. Closes #12543Brian Anderson-1/+1
Also renames the `Container` trait to `Collection`. [breaking-change]
2014-06-06std: Deal with fallout of rtio changesAlex Crichton-2/+2
2014-05-30std: Rename {Eq,Ord} to Partial{Eq,Ord}Alex Crichton-2/+2
This is part of the ongoing renaming of the equality traits. See #12517 for more details. All code using Eq/Ord will temporarily need to move to Partial{Eq,Ord} or the Total{Eq,Ord} traits. The Total traits will soon be renamed to {Eq,Ord}. cc #12517 [breaking-change]
2014-05-24Fixes problems on systems with opaque mutexValerii Hiora-13/+23
On some systems (iOS for example) mutex is represented by opaque data structure which doesn't play well with simple data copy. Therefore mutex should be initialized from magic static value and filled by OS only when it landed RC.
2014-05-22libstd: Remove `~str` from all `libstd` modules except `fmt` and `str`.Patrick Walton-2/+2
2014-05-19std: Move comm primitives away from UnsafeArcAlex Crichton-23/+28
They currently still use `&mut self`, this migration was aimed towards moving from UnsafeArc<T> to Arc<Unsafe<T>>
2014-05-11core: Remove the cast moduleAlex Crichton-8/+7
This commit revisits the `cast` module in libcore and libstd, and scrutinizes all functions inside of it. The result was to remove the `cast` module entirely, folding all functionality into the `mem` module. Specifically, this is the fate of each function in the `cast` module. * transmute - This function was moved to `mem`, but it is now marked as #[unstable]. This is due to planned changes to the `transmute` function and how it can be invoked (see the #[unstable] comment). For more information, see RFC 5 and #12898 * transmute_copy - This function was moved to `mem`, with clarification that is is not an error to invoke it with T/U that are different sizes, but rather that it is strongly discouraged. This function is now #[stable] * forget - This function was moved to `mem` and marked #[stable] * bump_box_refcount - This function was removed due to the deprecation of managed boxes as well as its questionable utility. * transmute_mut - This function was previously deprecated, and removed as part of this commit. * transmute_mut_unsafe - This function doesn't serve much of a purpose when it can be achieved with an `as` in safe code, so it was removed. * transmute_lifetime - This function was removed because it is likely a strong indication that code is incorrect in the first place. * transmute_mut_lifetime - This function was removed for the same reasons as `transmute_lifetime` * copy_lifetime - This function was moved to `mem`, but it is marked `#[unstable]` now due to the likelihood of being removed in the future if it is found to not be very useful. * copy_mut_lifetime - This function was also moved to `mem`, but had the same treatment as `copy_lifetime`. * copy_lifetime_vec - This function was removed because it is not used today, and its existence is not necessary with DST (copy_lifetime will suffice). In summary, the cast module was stripped down to these functions, and then the functions were moved to the `mem` module. transmute - #[unstable] transmute_copy - #[stable] forget - #[stable] copy_lifetime - #[unstable] copy_mut_lifetime - #[unstable] [breaking-change]
2014-05-07Test fixes and rebase conflictsAlex Crichton-2/+0
2014-05-06librustc: Remove `~EXPR`, `~TYPE`, and `~PAT` from the language, exceptPatrick Walton-20/+29
for `~str`/`~[]`. Note that `~self` still remains, since I forgot to add support for `Box<self>` before the snapshot. How to update your code: * Instead of `~EXPR`, you should write `box EXPR`. * Instead of `~TYPE`, you should write `Box<Type>`. * Instead of `~PATTERN`, you should write `box PATTERN`. [breaking-change]
2014-05-05std::comm: use Unsafe to avoid U.B. & -> &mut transmutes.Huon Wilson-34/+49
2014-05-05std: deprecate cast::transmute_mut.Huon Wilson-7/+12
Turning a `&T` into an `&mut T` carries a large risk of undefined behaviour, and needs to be done very very carefully. Providing a convenience function for exactly this task is a bad idea, just tempting people into doing the wrong thing. The right thing is to use types like `Cell`, `RefCell` or `Unsafe`. For memory safety, Rust has that guarantee that `&mut` pointers do not alias with any other pointer, that is, if you have a `&mut T` then that is the only usable pointer to that `T`. This allows Rust to assume that writes through a `&mut T` do not affect the values of any other `&` or `&mut` references. `&` pointers have no guarantees about aliasing or not, so it's entirely possible for the same pointer to be passed into both arguments of a function like fn foo(x: &int, y: &int) { ... } Converting either of `x` or `y` to a `&mut` pointer and modifying it would affect the other value: invalid behaviour. (Similarly, it's undefined behaviour to modify the value of an immutable local, like `let x = 1;`.) At a low-level, the *only* safe way to obtain an `&mut` out of a `&` is using the `Unsafe` type (there are higher level wrappers around it, like `Cell`, `RefCell`, `Mutex` etc.). The `Unsafe` type is registered with the compiler so that it can reason a little about these `&` to `&mut` casts, but it is still up to the user to ensure that the `&mut`s obtained out of an `Unsafe` never alias. (Note that *any* conversion from `&` to `&mut` can be invalid, including a plain `transmute`, or casting `&T` -> `*T` -> `*mut T` -> `&mut T`.) [breaking-change]
2014-05-02Replace most ~exprs with 'box'. #11779Brian Anderson-23/+23
2014-04-19Rewrite paragraph describing difference between try_send and send_optJames Sanders-4/+4
2014-04-18Fix a couple places in docs where try_send wasn't changed to send_optJames Sanders-2/+2
2014-04-18std: Make ~[T] no longer a growable vectorAlex Crichton-2/+0
This removes all resizability support for ~[T] vectors in preparation of DST. The only growable vector remaining is Vec<T>. In summary, the following methods from ~[T] and various functions were removed. Each method/function has an equivalent on the Vec type in std::vec unless otherwise stated. * slice::OwnedCloneableVector * slice::OwnedEqVector * slice::append * slice::append_one * slice::build (no replacement) * slice::bytes::push_bytes * slice::from_elem * slice::from_fn * slice::with_capacity * ~[T].capacity() * ~[T].clear() * ~[T].dedup() * ~[T].extend() * ~[T].grow() * ~[T].grow_fn() * ~[T].grow_set() * ~[T].insert() * ~[T].pop() * ~[T].push() * ~[T].push_all() * ~[T].push_all_move() * ~[T].remove() * ~[T].reserve() * ~[T].reserve_additional() * ~[T].reserve_exect() * ~[T].retain() * ~[T].set_len() * ~[T].shift() * ~[T].shrink_to_fit() * ~[T].swap_remove() * ~[T].truncate() * ~[T].unshift() * ~str.clear() * ~str.set_len() * ~str.truncate() Note that no other API changes were made. Existing apis that took or returned ~[T] continue to do so. [breaking-change]
2014-04-16auto merge of #13465 : alexcrichton/rust/fix-comm-dox, r=brsonbors-23/+77
Some of this documentation got a little out of date. There was no mention of a `SyncSender`, and the entire "Outside the runtime" section isn't really true any more (or really all that relevant). This also updates a few other doc blocks and adds some examples.
2014-04-15std: Update documentation on the `comm` moduleAlex Crichton-23/+77
Some of this documentation got a little out of date. There was no mention of a `SyncSender`, and the entire "Outside the runtime" section isn't really true any more (or really all that relevant). This also updates a few other doc blocks and adds some examples.
2014-04-13Make Result::{unwrap, unwrap_err} require ShowSteven Fackler-1/+1
`foo.ok().unwrap()` and `foo.err().unwrap()` are the fallbacks for types that aren't `Show`. Closes #13379
2014-04-10std: Make std::comm return types consistentAlex Crichton-155/+166
There are currently a number of return values from the std::comm methods, not all of which are necessarily completely expressive: Sender::try_send(t: T) -> bool This method currently doesn't transmit back the data `t` if the send fails due to the other end having disconnected. Additionally, this shares the name of the synchronous try_send method, but it differs in semantics in that it only has one failure case, not two (the buffer can never be full). SyncSender::try_send(t: T) -> TrySendResult<T> This method accurately conveys all possible information, but it uses a custom type to the std::comm module with no convenience methods on it. Additionally, if you want to inspect the result you're forced to import something from `std::comm`. SyncSender::send_opt(t: T) -> Option<T> This method uses Some(T) as an "error value" and None as a "success value", but almost all other uses of Option<T> have Some/None the other way Receiver::try_recv(t: T) -> TryRecvResult<T> Similarly to the synchronous try_send, this custom return type is lacking in terms of usability (no convenience methods). With this number of drawbacks in mind, I believed it was time to re-work the return types of these methods. The new API for the comm module is: Sender::send(t: T) -> () Sender::send_opt(t: T) -> Result<(), T> SyncSender::send(t: T) -> () SyncSender::send_opt(t: T) -> Result<(), T> SyncSender::try_send(t: T) -> Result<(), TrySendError<T>> Receiver::recv() -> T Receiver::recv_opt() -> Result<T, ()> Receiver::try_recv() -> Result<T, TryRecvError> The notable changes made are: * Sender::try_send => Sender::send_opt. This renaming brings the semantics in line with the SyncSender::send_opt method. An asychronous send only has one failure case, unlike the synchronous try_send method which has two failure cases (full/disconnected). * Sender::send_opt returns the data back to the caller if the send is guaranteed to fail. This method previously returned `bool`, but then it was unable to retrieve the data if the data was guaranteed to fail to send. There is still a race such that when `Ok(())` is returned the data could still fail to be received, but that's inherent to an asynchronous channel. * Result is now the basis of all return values. This not only adds lots of convenience methods to all return values for free, but it also means that you can inspect the return values with no extra imports (Ok/Err are in the prelude). Additionally, it's now self documenting when something failed or not because the return value has "Err" in the name. Things I'm a little uneasy about: * The methods send_opt and recv_opt are not returning options, but rather results. I felt more strongly that Option was the wrong return type than the _opt prefix was wrong, and I coudn't think of a much better name for these methods. One possible way to think about them is to read the _opt suffix as "optionally". * Result<T, ()> is often better expressed as Option<T>. This is only applicable to the recv_opt() method, but I thought it would be more consistent for everything to return Result rather than one method returning an Option. Despite my two reasons to feel uneasy, I feel much better about the consistency in return values at this point, and I think the only real open question is if there's a better suffix for {send,recv}_opt. Closes #11527
2014-04-06std: Ignore a flaky std::comm testAlex Crichton-1/+1
This test relies on the parent to be descheduled before the child sends its data. This has proved to be unreliable on libnative on the bots. It's a fairly trivial test regardless, so ignoring it for now won't lose much.
2014-04-02Fix fallout of requiring uint indicesAlex Crichton-1/+1
2014-03-31std: Switch field privacy as necessaryAlex Crichton-20/+20
2014-03-28Convert most code to new inner attribute syntax.Brian Anderson-1/+1
Closes #2569
2014-03-28syntax: Accept meta matchers in macrosAlex Crichton-3/+3
This removes the `attr` matcher and adds a `meta` matcher. The previous `attr` matcher is now ambiguous because it doesn't disambiguate whether it means inner attribute or outer attribute. The new behavior can still be achieved by taking an argument of the form `#[$foo:meta]` (the brackets are part of the macro pattern). Closes #13067
2014-03-24comm: Implement synchronous channelsAlex Crichton-2/+1217
This commit contains an implementation of synchronous, bounded channels for Rust. This is an implementation of the proposal made last January [1]. These channels are built on mutexes, and currently focus on a working implementation rather than speed. Receivers for sync channels have select() implemented for them, but there is currently no implementation of select() for sync senders. Rust will continue to provide both synchronous and asynchronous channels as part of the standard distribution, there is no intent to remove asynchronous channels. This flavor of channels is meant to provide an alternative to asynchronous channels because like green tasks, asynchronous channels are not appropriate for all situations. [1] - https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2014-January/007924.html
2014-03-23std: Move NativeMutex from &mut self to &selfAlex Crichton-1/+1
The proper usage of shared types is now sharing through `&self` rather than `&mut self` because the mutable version will provide stronger guarantees (no aliasing on *any* thread).
2014-03-22std::comm: Remove Freeze / NoFreezeFlavio Percoco-6/+4
2014-03-20rename std::vec -> std::sliceDaniel Micay-2/+2
Closes #12702
2014-03-13std: Rename Chan/Port types and constructorAlex Crichton-534/+535
* Chan<T> => Sender<T> * Port<T> => Receiver<T> * Chan::new() => channel() * constructor returns (Sender, Receiver) instead of (Receiver, Sender) * local variables named `port` renamed to `rx` * local variables named `chan` renamed to `tx` Closes #11765
2014-03-12std: Relax an assertion in oneshot selectionAlex Crichton-7/+64
The assertion was erroneously ensuring that there was no data on the port when the port had selection aborted on it. This assertion was written in error because it's possible for data to be waiting on a port, even after it was disconnected. When aborting selection, if we see that there's data on the port, then we return true that data is available on the port. Closes #12802
2014-03-06fix typos with with repeated words, just like this sentence.Kang Seonghoon-1/+1
2014-02-28std: Change assert_eq!() to use {} instead of {:?}Alex Crichton-1/+1
Formatting via reflection has been a little questionable for some time now, and it's a little unfortunate that one of the standard macros will silently use reflection when you weren't expecting it. This adds small bits of code bloat to libraries, as well as not always being necessary. In light of this information, this commit switches assert_eq!() to using {} in the error message instead of {:?}. In updating existing code, there were a few error cases that I encountered: * It's impossible to define Show for [T, ..N]. I think DST will alleviate this because we can define Show for [T]. * A few types here and there just needed a #[deriving(Show)] * Type parameters needed a Show bound, I often moved this to `assert!(a == b)` * `Path` doesn't implement `Show`, so assert_eq!() cannot be used on two paths. I don't think this is much of a regression though because {:?} on paths looks awful (it's a byte array). Concretely speaking, this shaved 10K off a 656K binary. Not a lot, but sometime significant for smaller binaries.
2014-02-27std: Export the select! macroAlex Crichton-16/+0
Mark it as #[experimental] for now. In theory this attribute will be read in the future. I believe that the implementation is solid enough for general use, although I would not be surprised if there were bugs in it still. I think that it's at the point now where public usage of it will start to uncover hopefully the last few remaining bugs. Closes #12044
2014-02-21auto merge of #12419 : huonw/rust/compiler-unsafe, r=alexcrichtonbors-17/+13
Previously an `unsafe` block created by the compiler (like those in the formatting macros) would be "ignored" if surrounded by `unsafe`, that is, the internal unsafety would be being legitimised by the external block: unsafe { println!("...") } =(expansion)=> unsafe { ... unsafe { ... } } And the code in the inner block would be using the outer block, making it considered used (and the inner one considered unused). This patch forces the compiler to create a new unsafe context for compiler generated blocks, so that their internal unsafety doesn't escape to external blocks. Fixes #12418.
2014-02-20rustc: avoid compiler generated `unsafe` blocks leaking.Huon Wilson-17/+13
Previously an `unsafe` block created by the compiler (like those in the formatting macros) would be "ignored" if surrounded by `unsafe`, that is, the internal unsafety would be being legitimised by the external block: unsafe { println!("...") } =(expansion)=> unsafe { ... unsafe { ... } } And the code in the inner block would be using the outer block, making it considered used (and the inner one considered unused). This patch forces the compiler to create a new unsafe context for compiler generated blocks, so that their internal unsafety doesn't escape to external blocks. Fixes #12418.
2014-02-19Fix sending/try_recv on channels off the runtimeAlex Crichton-10/+49
The fairness yield mistakenly called `Local::take()` which meant that it would only work if a local task was available. In theory sending on a channel (or calling try_recv) requires no runtime because it never blocks, so there's no reason it shouldn't support such a use case. Closes #12391
2014-02-18auto merge of #12345 : huonw/rust/speeling, r=cmrbors-1/+1
2014-02-17Fix a deadlock in channels, again.Alex Crichton-4/+4
This deadlock was caused when the channel was closed at just the right time, so the extra `self.cnt.fetch_add` actually should have preserved the DISCONNECTED state of the channel. by modifying this the channel entered a state such that the port would never succeed in dropping. This also moves the increment of self.steals until after the MAX_STEALS block. The reason for this is that in 'fn recv()' the steals variable is decremented immediately after the try_recv(), which could in theory set steals to -1 if it was previously set to 0 in try_recv(). Closes #12340
2014-02-18Spellcheck library docs.Huon Wilson-1/+1
2014-02-15auto merge of #12302 : alexcrichton/rust/issue-12295, r=brsonbors-7/+28
The previous code erroneously assumed that 'steals > cnt' was always true, but that was a false assumption. The code was altered to decrement steals to a minimum of 0 instead of taking all of cnt into account. I didn't include the exact test from #12295 because it could run for quite awhile, and instead set the threshold for MAX_STEALS to much lower during testing. I found that this triggered the old bug quite frequently when running without this fix. Closes #12295
2014-02-15auto merge of #12298 : alexcrichton/rust/rustdoc-testing, r=sfacklerbors-1/+1
It's too easy to forget the `rust` tag to test something. Closes #11698
2014-02-15Correctly reset steals when hitting MAX_STEALSAlex Crichton-7/+28
The previous code erroneously assumed that 'steals > cnt' was always true, but that was a false assumption. The code was altered to decrement steals to a minimum of 0 instead of taking all of cnt into account. I didn't include the exact test from #12295 because it could run for quite awhile, and instead set the threshold for MAX_STEALS to much lower during testing. I found that this triggered the old bug quite frequently when running without this fix. Closes #12295
2014-02-16Convert some unnecessary StaticNativeMutexes to NativeMutexes.Huon Wilson-4/+3