| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prevously the `read_to_end` implementation for `std::io::Take` used its
own `limit` as a cap on the `reservation_size`. However, that could
still result in an over-allocation like this:
1. Call `reader.take(5).read_to_end(&mut vec)`.
2. `read_to_end_with_reservation` reserves 5 bytes and calls `read`.
3. `read` writes 5 bytes.
4. `read_to_end_with_reservation` reserves 5 bytes and calls `read`.
5. `read` writes 0 bytes.
6. The read loop ends with `vec` having length 5 and capacity 10.
The reservation of 5 bytes was correct for the read at step 2 but
unnecessary for the read at step 4. By that second read, `Take::limit`
is 0, but the `read_to_end_with_reservation` loop is still using the
same `reservation_size` it started with.
Solve this by having `read_to_end_with_reservation` take a closure,
which lets it get a fresh `reservation_size` for each read. This is an
implementation detail which doesn't affect any public API.
|
|
|
|
simplify std::io::Write::write rustdoc
The std::io::Write::write method currensly suggests consumers guaranteed
that `0 <= n <= buf.len()`, for `Ok(n)`, however `n` is of type `usize`
causing the compiler to emit a warning:
```
warning: comparison is useless due to type limits
--> lib.rs:6:18
|
6 | Ok(n) => 0 <= n && n <= output.len(),
| ^^^^^^
|
= note: #[warn(unused_comparisons)] on by default
```
This PR removes the suggestion to check `0 <= n` since it is moot.
r? @steveklabnik
|
|
Fix few Clippy warnings
|
|
read: fix doc comment
No idea how that happened...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The std::io::Write::write method currensly suggests consumers guaranteed
that `0 <= n <= buf.len()`, for `Ok(n)`, however `n` is of type `usize`
causing the compiler to emit a warning:
```
warning: comparison is useless due to type limits
--> lib.rs:6:18
|
6 | Ok(n) => 0 <= n && n <= output.len(),
| ^^^^^^
|
= note: #[warn(unused_comparisons)] on by default
```
This PR removes the suggestion to check `0 <= n` since it is moot.
r? @steveklabnik
|
|
Fix a typo in Write::write_vectored docs
Fixed what seems like a typo. "Copy to from" is extremely confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buffer
|
|
Stabilize bufreader_buffer feature
FCP done in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45323#issuecomment-495937047
Closes #45323
r? @SimonSapin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix intra-doc link resolution failure on re-exporting libstd
Currently, re-exporting libstd items as below will [occur a lot of failures](https://gist.github.com/taiki-e/e33e0e8631ef47f65a74a3b69f456366).
```rust
pub use std::*;
```
Until the underlying issue (#56922) fixed, we can fix that so they don't propagate to downstream crates.
Related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56941 (That PR fixed failures that occur when re-exporting from libcore to libstd.)
r? @QuietMisdreavus
|
|
|
|
std: Derive `Default` for `io::Cursor`
I think this change is quite obvious, so made it insta-stable, but I won't insist on that.
|
|
(Partially) brings back https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/33921
|
|
|
|
Stabilized vectored IO
This renames `std::io::IoVec` to `std::io::IoSlice` and
`std::io::IoVecMut` to `std::io::IoSliceMut`, and stabilizes
`std::io::IoSlice`, `std::io::IoSliceMut`,
`std::io::Read::read_vectored`, and `std::io::Write::write_vectored`.
Closes #58452
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
|
|
This renames `std::io::IoVec` to `std::io::IoSlice` and
`std::io::IoVecMut` to `std::io::IoSliceMut`, and stabilizes
`std::io::IoSlice`, `std::io::IoSliceMut`,
`std::io::Read::read_vectored`, and `std::io::Write::write_vectored`.
Closes #58452
|
|
Closes #60271.
|
|
|
|
Make BufWriter use get_mut instead of manipulating inner in Write implementation
`get_mut` allows us to abstract over the implementation detail of inner being optional.
|
|
get_mut allows us to abstract over the implementation detail of inner being
optional.
|
|
This commit implements the `{read,write}_vectored` methods on more types
in the standard library, namely:
* `std::fs::File`
* `std::process::ChildStd{in,out,err}`
* `std::io::Std{in,out,err}`
* `std::io::Std{in,out,err}Lock`
* `std::io::Std{in,out,err}Raw`
Where supported the OS implementations hook up to native support,
otherwise it falls back to the already-defaulted implementation.
|
|
|
|
Calling `Read::read` or `Write::write` without checking the returned
`usize` value is almost always an error. Example code in the
documentation should demonstrate how to use the return value correctly.
Otherwise, people might copy the example code thinking that it is okay
to "fire and forget" these methods.
|
|
|
|
Fix link capitalization in documentation of std::io::BufWriter.
|
|
|
|
Resolves #55546
|
|
|
|
Add provided methods `Seek::{stream_len, stream_position}`
This adds two new, provided methods to the `io::Seek` trait:
- `fn stream_len(&mut self) -> Result<u64>`
- `fn stream_position(&mut self) -> Result<u64>`
Both are added for convenience and to improve readability in user code. Reading `file.stream_len()` is much better than to manually seek two or three times. Similarly, `file.stream_position()` is much more clear than `file.seek(SeekFrom::Current(0))`.
You can find prior discussions [in this internals thread](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-idea-extend-io-seek-with-convenience-methods-with-e-g-stream-len/9262). I think I addressed all concerns in that thread.
I already wrote three RFCs to add a small new API to libstd but I noticed that many public changes to libstd happen without an RFC. So I figured I can try opening a PR directly without going through RFCs first. After all, we do have rfcbot here too. If you think this change is too big to merge without an RFC, I can still close this PR and write an RFC.
|
|
Add new test case for possible bug in BufReader
When reading a large chunk from a BufReader, if all the bytes from the buffer have been already consumed, the internal buffer is bypassed entirely. However, it is not invalidated, and it's possible to access its contents using the `seek_relative` method, because it tries to reuse the existing buffer.
|
