| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
All methods are inlined into Iterator with `Self: Sized` bounds to make
sure Iterator is still object safe.
[breaking-change]
|
|
Previously a panic was generated for recursive prints due to a double-borrow of
a `RefCell`. This was solved by the second borrow's output being directed
towards the global stdout instead of the per-thread stdout (still experimental
functionality).
After this functionality was altered, however, recursive prints still deadlocked
due to the overridden `write_fmt` method which locked itself first and then
wrote all the data. This was fixed by removing the override of the `write_fmt`
method. This means that unlocked usage of `write!` on a `Stdout`/`Stderr` may be
slower due to acquiring more locks, but it's easy to make more performant with a
call to `.lock()`.
Closes #23781
|
|
Conflicts:
src/librustc/middle/ty.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/adt.rs
src/librustc_typeck/check/mod.rs
src/libserialize/json.rs
src/test/run-pass/spawn-fn.rs
|
|
Now that `<[_]>::split` is an inherent method, it will trump `BufRead::split`
when `BufRead` is in scope, so there is no longer a conflict. As a result,
calling `slice.split()` will probably always give you precisely what you want!
|
|
This attribute has been deprecated in favor of #[should_panic]. This also
updates rustdoc to no longer accept the `should_fail` directive and instead
renames it to `should_panic`.
|
|
Now that `<[_]>::split` is an inherent method, it will trump `BufRead::split`
when `BufRead` is in scope, so there is no longer a conflict. As a result,
calling `slice.split()` will probably always give you precisely what you want!
|
|
This attribute has been deprecated in favor of #[should_panic]. This also
updates rustdoc to no longer accept the `should_fail` directive and instead
renames it to `should_panic`.
|
|
Now that support has been removed, all lingering use cases are renamed.
|
|
before:
test bench_read_slice ... bench: 68 ns/iter (+/- 56)
test bench_read_vec ... bench: 78 ns/iter (+/- 21)
test bench_write_slice ... bench: 133 ns/iter (+/- 46)
test bench_write_vec ... bench: 308 ns/iter (+/- 69)
after:
test bench_read_slice ... bench: 32 ns/iter (+/- 10)
test bench_read_vec ... bench: 32 ns/iter (+/- 8)
test bench_write_slice ... bench: 53 ns/iter (+/- 12)
test bench_write_vec ... bench: 247 ns/iter (+/- 172)
|
|
When built with `rustc -O`:
before:
test bench_read_slice ... bench: 68 ns/iter (+/- 56)
test bench_read_vec ... bench: 78 ns/iter (+/- 21)
test bench_write_slice ... bench: 133 ns/iter (+/- 46)
test bench_write_vec ... bench: 308 ns/iter (+/- 69)
after:
test bench_read_slice ... bench: 32 ns/iter (+/- 10)
test bench_read_vec ... bench: 32 ns/iter (+/- 8)
test bench_write_slice ... bench: 53 ns/iter (+/- 12)
test bench_write_vec ... bench: 247 ns/iter (+/- 172)
|
|
Main motivation was to update docs for the removal or "demotion" of certain extension traits. The update to the slice docs was larger, since the text was largely outdated.
|
|
Reject specialized Drop impls.
See Issue #8142 for discussion.
This makes it illegal for a Drop impl to be more specialized than the original item.
So for example, all of the following are now rejected (when they would have been blindly accepted before):
```rust
struct S<A> { ... };
impl Drop for S<i8> { ... } // error: specialized to concrete type
struct T<'a> { ... };
impl Drop for T<'static> { ... } // error: specialized to concrete region
struct U<A> { ... };
impl<A:Clone> Drop for U<A> { ... } // error: added extra type requirement
struct V<'a,'b>;
impl<'a,'b:a> Drop for V<'a,'b> { ... } // error: added extra region requirement
```
Due to examples like the above, this is a [breaking-change].
(The fix is to either remove the specialization from the `Drop` impl, or to transcribe the requirements into the struct/enum definition; examples of both are shown in the PR's fixed to `libstd`.)
----
This is likely to be the last thing blocking the removal of the `#[unsafe_destructor]` attribute.
Fix #8142
Fix #23584
|
|
This commit alters the behavior of the `Read::read_to_end()` method to zero all
memory instead of passing an uninitialized buffer to `read`. This change is
motivated by the [discussion on the internals forum][discuss] where the
conclusion has been that the standard library will not expose uninitialized
memory.
[discuss]: http://internals.rust-lang.org/t/uninitialized-memory/1652
Closes #20314
|
|
There have been some recent panics on the bots and this commit is an attempt to
appease them. Previously it was considered invalid to run `rt::at_exit` after
the handlers had already started running. Due to the multithreaded nature of
applications, however, it is not always possible to guarantee this. For example
[this program][ex] will show off the abort.
[ex]: https://gist.github.com/alexcrichton/56300b87af6fa554e52d
The semantics of the `rt::at_exit` function have been modified as such:
* It is now legal to call `rt::at_exit` at any time. The return value now
indicates whether the closure was successfully registered or not. Callers must
now decide what to do with this information.
* The `rt::at_exit` handlers will now be run for a fixed number of iterations.
Common cases (such as the example shown) may end up registering a new handler
while others are running perhaps once or twice, so this common condition is
covered by re-running the handlers a fixed number of times, after which new
registrations are forbidden.
Some usage of `rt::at_exit` was updated to handle these new semantics, but
deprecated or unstable libraries calling `rt::at_exit` were not updated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit alters the behavior of the `Read::read_to_end()` method to zero all
memory instead of passing an uninitialized buffer to `read`. This change is
motivated by the [discussion on the internals forum][discuss] where the
conclusion has been that the standard library will not expose uninitialized
memory.
[discuss]: http://internals.rust-lang.org/t/uninitialized-memory/1652
Closes #20314
|
|
Fixes #23196
|
|
r? @steveklabnik
|
|
Closes #23599
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
This small commit stabilizes the `Error` trait as-is, except that `Send`
and `Debug` are added as constraints. The `Send` constraint is because
most uses of `Error` will be for trait objects, and by default we would
like these objects to be transferrable between threads. The `Debug`
constraint is to ensure that e.g. `Box<Error>` is `Debug`, and because
types that implement `Display` should certainly implement `Debug` in any case.
In the near future we expect to add `Any`-like downcasting features to
`Error`, but this is waiting on some additional
mechanisms (`Reflect`). It will be added before 1.0 via default methods.
[breaking-change]
r? @alexcrichton
Closes #21790
|
|
This small commit stabilizes the `Error` trait as-is, except that `Send`
and `Debug` are added as constraints. The `Send` constraint is because
most uses of `Error` will be for trait objects, and by default we would
like these objects to be transferrable between threads. The `Debug`
constraint is to ensure that e.g. `Box<Error>` is `Debug`, and because
types that implement `Display` should certainly implement `Debug` in any case.
In the near future we expect to add `Any`-like downcasting features to
`Error`, but this is waiting on some additional
mechanisms (`Reflect`). It will be added before 1.0 via default methods.
[breaking-change]
|
|
Fixes #23196
|
|
|
|
|
|
There have been some recent panics on the bots and this commit is an attempt to
appease them. Previously it was considered invalid to run `rt::at_exit` after
the handlers had already started running. Due to the multithreaded nature of
applications, however, it is not always possible to guarantee this. For example
[this program][ex] will show off the abort.
[ex]: https://gist.github.com/alexcrichton/56300b87af6fa554e52d
The semantics of the `rt::at_exit` function have been modified as such:
* It is now legal to call `rt::at_exit` at any time. The return value now
indicates whether the closure was successfully registered or not. Callers must
now decide what to do with this information.
* The `rt::at_exit` handlers will now be run for a fixed number of iterations.
Common cases (such as the example shown) may end up registering a new handler
while others are running perhaps once or twice, so this common condition is
covered by re-running the handlers a fixed number of times, after which new
registrations are forbidden.
Some usage of `rt::at_exit` was updated to handle these new semantics, but
deprecated or unstable libraries calling `rt::at_exit` were not updated.
|
|
This commit removes the reexports of `old_io` traits as well as `old_path` types
and traits from the prelude. This functionality is now all deprecated and needs
to be removed to make way for other functionality like `Seek` in the `std::io`
module (currently reexported as `NewSeek` in the io prelude).
Closes #23377
Closes #23378
|
|
This commit removes the reexports of `old_io` traits as well as `old_path` types
and traits from the prelude. This functionality is now all deprecated and needs
to be removed to make way for other functionality like `Seek` in the `std::io`
module (currently reexported as `NewSeek` in the io prelude).
Closes #23377
Closes #23378
|
|
because then the call to `unwrap()` will not print the error object.
|
|
|
|
Multiple people have been suprised by this aspect of read_line's behavior, which is not obvious from the docs.
|
|
This commit stabilizes the `ErrorKind` enumeration which is consumed by and
generated by the `io::Error` type. The purpose of this type is to serve as a
cross-platform namespace to categorize errors into. Two specific issues are
addressed as part of this stablization:
* The naming of each variant was scrutinized and some were tweaked. An example
is how `FileNotFound` was renamed to simply `NotFound`. These names should not
show either a Unix or Windows bias and the set of names is intended to grow
over time. For now the names will likely largely consist of those errors
generated by the I/O APIs in the standard library.
* The mapping of OS error codes onto kinds has been altered. Coalescing no
longer occurs (multiple error codes become one kind). It is intended that each
OS error code, if bound, corresponds to only one `ErrorKind`. The current set
of error kinds was expanded slightly to include some networking errors.
This commit also adds a `raw_os_error` function which returns an `Option<i32>`
to extract the underlying raw error code from the `Error`.
Closes #16666
[breaking-change]
|
|
This commit stabilizes the `ErrorKind` enumeration which is consumed by and
generated by the `io::Error` type. The purpose of this type is to serve as a
cross-platform namespace to categorize errors into. Two specific issues are
addressed as part of this stablization:
* The naming of each variant was scrutinized and some were tweaked. An example
is how `FileNotFound` was renamed to simply `NotFound`. These names should not
show either a Unix or Windows bias and the set of names is intended to grow
over time. For now the names will likely largely consist of those errors
generated by the I/O APIs in the standard library.
* The mapping of OS error codes onto kinds has been altered. Coalescing no
longer occurs (multiple error codes become one kind). It is intended that each
OS error code, if bound, corresponds to only one `ErrorKind`. The current set
of error kinds was expanded slightly to include some networking errors.
This commit also adds a `raw_os_error` function which returns an `Option<i32>`
to extract the underlying raw error code from the `Error`.
|
|
I corrected misspelled comments in several crates.
|
|
I corrected misspelled comments in several crates.
|
|
Nothing inside of the read/write interface itself can panic, so any
poison must have been the result of user code which the lock isn't
protecting.
This seems safe to me, but if we don't want to go this route we should update the docs to indicate that these methods can panic.
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
Multiple people have been suprised by this aspect of read_line's behavior,
which is not obvious from the docs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
&b"..."[..] instead.
|
|
Nothing inside of the read/write interface itself can panic, so any
poison must have been the result of user code which the lock isn't
protecting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolves #23386.
|
|
The [associated RFC][rfc] for possibly splitting out `flush` has been closed and
as a result there are no more blockers for stabilizing this method, so this
commit marks the method as such.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/950
|
|
The word 'flush' may be misinterpreted as if `flush` is called on the
underlying writer, which is not the case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The [associated RFC][rfc] for possibly splitting out `flush` has been closed and
as a result there are no more blockers for stabilizing this method, so this
commit marks the method as such.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/950
|
