| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
read: fix doc comment
No idea how that happened...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix a typo in Write::write_vectored docs
Fixed what seems like a typo. "Copy to from" is extremely confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buffer
|
|
Stabilize bufreader_buffer feature
FCP done in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45323#issuecomment-495937047
Closes #45323
r? @SimonSapin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix intra-doc link resolution failure on re-exporting libstd
Currently, re-exporting libstd items as below will [occur a lot of failures](https://gist.github.com/taiki-e/e33e0e8631ef47f65a74a3b69f456366).
```rust
pub use std::*;
```
Until the underlying issue (#56922) fixed, we can fix that so they don't propagate to downstream crates.
Related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56941 (That PR fixed failures that occur when re-exporting from libcore to libstd.)
r? @QuietMisdreavus
|
|
|
|
std: Derive `Default` for `io::Cursor`
I think this change is quite obvious, so made it insta-stable, but I won't insist on that.
|
|
(Partially) brings back https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/33921
|
|
|
|
Stabilized vectored IO
This renames `std::io::IoVec` to `std::io::IoSlice` and
`std::io::IoVecMut` to `std::io::IoSliceMut`, and stabilizes
`std::io::IoSlice`, `std::io::IoSliceMut`,
`std::io::Read::read_vectored`, and `std::io::Write::write_vectored`.
Closes #58452
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
|
|
This renames `std::io::IoVec` to `std::io::IoSlice` and
`std::io::IoVecMut` to `std::io::IoSliceMut`, and stabilizes
`std::io::IoSlice`, `std::io::IoSliceMut`,
`std::io::Read::read_vectored`, and `std::io::Write::write_vectored`.
Closes #58452
|
|
Closes #60271.
|
|
|
|
Make BufWriter use get_mut instead of manipulating inner in Write implementation
`get_mut` allows us to abstract over the implementation detail of inner being optional.
|
|
get_mut allows us to abstract over the implementation detail of inner being
optional.
|
|
This commit implements the `{read,write}_vectored` methods on more types
in the standard library, namely:
* `std::fs::File`
* `std::process::ChildStd{in,out,err}`
* `std::io::Std{in,out,err}`
* `std::io::Std{in,out,err}Lock`
* `std::io::Std{in,out,err}Raw`
Where supported the OS implementations hook up to native support,
otherwise it falls back to the already-defaulted implementation.
|
|
|
|
Calling `Read::read` or `Write::write` without checking the returned
`usize` value is almost always an error. Example code in the
documentation should demonstrate how to use the return value correctly.
Otherwise, people might copy the example code thinking that it is okay
to "fire and forget" these methods.
|
|
|
|
Fix link capitalization in documentation of std::io::BufWriter.
|
|
|
|
Resolves #55546
|
|
|
|
Add provided methods `Seek::{stream_len, stream_position}`
This adds two new, provided methods to the `io::Seek` trait:
- `fn stream_len(&mut self) -> Result<u64>`
- `fn stream_position(&mut self) -> Result<u64>`
Both are added for convenience and to improve readability in user code. Reading `file.stream_len()` is much better than to manually seek two or three times. Similarly, `file.stream_position()` is much more clear than `file.seek(SeekFrom::Current(0))`.
You can find prior discussions [in this internals thread](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-idea-extend-io-seek-with-convenience-methods-with-e-g-stream-len/9262). I think I addressed all concerns in that thread.
I already wrote three RFCs to add a small new API to libstd but I noticed that many public changes to libstd happen without an RFC. So I figured I can try opening a PR directly without going through RFCs first. After all, we do have rfcbot here too. If you think this change is too big to merge without an RFC, I can still close this PR and write an RFC.
|
|
Add new test case for possible bug in BufReader
When reading a large chunk from a BufReader, if all the bytes from the buffer have been already consumed, the internal buffer is bypassed entirely. However, it is not invalidated, and it's possible to access its contents using the `seek_relative` method, because it tries to reuse the existing buffer.
|
|
Fix typos in the documentation
Co-Authored-By: LukasKalbertodt <lukas.kalbertodt@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix SGX implementations of read/write_vectored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These two methods are defined in terms of `Seek::seek` and are
added for convenience. Tests are included.
|
|
overhaul unused doc comments lint
This PR contains a number of improvements to the `unused_doc_comments` lint.
- Extends the span to cover the entire comment when using sugared doc comments.
- Triggers the lint for all unused doc comments on a node, instead of just the first one.
- Triggers the lint on macro expansions, and provides a help note explaining that doc comments must be expanded by the macro.
- Adds a label pointing at the node that cannot be documented.
Furthermore, this PR fixes any instances in rustc where a macro expansion was erroneously documented.
|
|
Report the diagnostic on macro expansions, and add a label indicating
why the comment is unused.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two moments when a BufRead object needs to empty it's internal
buffer:
- In a seek call;
- In a read call when all data in the internal buffer had been already
consumed and the output buffer has a greater or equal size than the
internal buffer.
In both cases, the buffer was not being properly emptied, but only
marked as consumed (self.pos = self.cap). That should be no problem if
the inner reader is only Read, but if it is Seek as well, then it's
possible to access the data in the buffer by using the seek_relative
method. In order to prevent this from happening, both self.pos and
self.cap should be set to 0.
Two test cases were added to detect that failure:
- test_buffered_reader_invalidated_after_read
- test_buffered_reader_invalidated_after_seek
Both tests are very similar to each other. The inner reader contains the
following data: [5, 6, 7, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4]. The buffer capacity is 3
bytes.
- First, we call fill_buffer, which loads [5, 6, 7] into the internal
buffer, and then consume those 3 bytes.
- Then we either read the 5 remaining bytes in a single read call or we
move to the end of the stream by calling seek. In both cases the
buffer should be emptied to prevent the previous data [5, 6, 7] from
being read.
- We now call seek_relative(-2) and read two bytes, which should give us
the last 2 bytes of the stream: [3, 4].
Before this commit, the the seek_relative method would consider that
we're still in the range of the internal buffer, so instead of fetching
data from the inner reader, it would return the two last bytes that were
incorrectly still in the buffer: [6, 7]. Therefore, the test would fail.
Now, when seek_relative is called the buffer is empty. So the expected
data [3, 4] is fetched from the inner reader and the test passes.
|
|
|
|
Relax Read bounds on a bunch of BufReader<R> methods
|
|
|
