| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
This permits all coercions to be performed in casts, but adds lints to warn in those cases.
Part of this patch moves cast checking to a later stage of type checking. We acquire obligations to check casts as part of type checking where we previously checked them. Once we have type checked a function or module, then we check any cast obligations which have been acquired. That means we have more type information available to check casts (this was crucial to making coercions work properly in place of some casts), but it means that casts cannot feed input into type inference.
[breaking change]
* Adds two new lints for trivial casts and trivial numeric casts, these are warn by default, but can cause errors if you build with warnings as errors. Previously, trivial numeric casts and casts to trait objects were allowed.
* The unused casts lint has gone.
* Interactions between casting and type inference have changed in subtle ways. Two ways this might manifest are:
- You may need to 'direct' casts more with extra type information, for example, in some cases where `foo as _ as T` succeeded, you may now need to specify the type for `_`
- Casts do not influence inference of integer types. E.g., the following used to type check:
```
let x = 42;
let y = &x as *const u32;
```
Because the cast would inform inference that `x` must have type `u32`. This no longer applies and the compiler will fallback to `i32` for `x` and thus there will be a type error in the cast. The solution is to add more type information:
```
let x: u32 = 42;
let y = &x as *const u32;
```
|
|
into MethodTraitItem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a hack, but I don't think we can do much better as long as `derive` is
running at the syntax expansion phase.
If the custom_derive feature gate is enabled, this works with user-defined
traits and syntax extensions. Without the gate, you can't use e.g. #[derive_Clone]
directly, so this does not change the stable language.
This commit also cleans up the deriving code somewhat, and forbids some
previously-meaningless attribute syntax. For this reason it's technically a
[breaking-change]
|
|
Unstable items used in a macro expansion will now always trigger
stability warnings, *unless* the unstable items are directly inside a
macro marked with `#[allow_internal_unstable]`. IOW, the compiler warns
unless the span of the unstable item is a subspan of the definition of a
macro marked with that attribute.
E.g.
#[allow_internal_unstable]
macro_rules! foo {
($e: expr) => {{
$e;
unstable(); // no warning
only_called_by_foo!();
}}
}
macro_rules! only_called_by_foo {
() => { unstable() } // warning
}
foo!(unstable()) // warning
The unstable inside `foo` is fine, due to the attribute. But the
`unstable` inside `only_called_by_foo` is not, since that macro doesn't
have the attribute, and the `unstable` passed into `foo` is also not
fine since it isn't contained in the macro itself (that is, even though
it is only used directly in the macro).
In the process this makes the stability tracking much more precise,
e.g. previously `println!("{}", unstable())` got no warning, but now it
does. As such, this is a bug fix that may cause [breaking-change]s.
The attribute is definitely feature gated, since it explicitly allows
side-stepping the feature gating system.
---
This updates `thread_local!` macro to use the attribute, since it uses
unstable features internally (initialising a struct with unstable
fields).
|
|
Unstable items used in a macro expansion will now always trigger
stability warnings, *unless* the unstable items are directly inside a
macro marked with `#[allow_internal_unstable]`. IOW, the compiler warns
unless the span of the unstable item is a subspan of the definition of a
macro marked with that attribute.
E.g.
#[allow_internal_unstable]
macro_rules! foo {
($e: expr) => {{
$e;
unstable(); // no warning
only_called_by_foo!();
}}
}
macro_rules! only_called_by_foo {
() => { unstable() } // warning
}
foo!(unstable()) // warning
The unstable inside `foo` is fine, due to the attribute. But the
`unstable` inside `only_called_by_foo` is not, since that macro doesn't
have the attribute, and the `unstable` passed into `foo` is also not
fine since it isn't contained in the macro itself (that is, even though
it is only used directly in the macro).
In the process this makes the stability tracking much more precise,
e.g. previously `println!("{}", unstable())` got no warning, but now it
does. As such, this is a bug fix that may cause [breaking-change]s.
The attribute is definitely feature gated, since it explicitly allows
side-stepping the feature gating system.
|
|
When warnings and errors occur, the associated help message should not print the same code snippet.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/21938
|
|
Fixes #19674
Fixes #17396 (already closed, yeah)
cc @kmcallister , @cmr
|
|
|
|
Many of the modifications putting in `Box::new` calls also include a
pointer to Issue 22405, which tracks going back to `box <expr>` if
possible in the future.
(Still tried to use `Box<_>` where it sufficed; thus some tests still
have `box_syntax` enabled, as they use a mix of `box` and `Box::new`.)
Precursor for overloaded-`box` and placement-`in`; see Issue 22181.
|
|
|
|
MacEager is a MacResult implementation for the common case where you've already
built each form of AST that you might return.
Fixes #17637. Based on #18814.
This is a [breaking-change] for syntax extensions:
* MacExpr::new becomes MacEager::expr.
* MacPat::new becomes MacEager::pat.
* MacItems::new becomes MacEager::items. It takes a SmallVector directly,
not an iterator.
|
|
where possible.
|
|
This overlaps with #22276 (I left make check running overnight) but covers a number of additional cases and has a few rewrites where the clones are not even necessary.
This also implements `RandomAccessIterator` for `iter::Cloned`
cc @steveklabnik, you may want to glance at this before #22281 gets the bors treatment
|
|
|
|
Pass features along during expansion
Use the set of passed features to detect uses of feature-gated macros without the corresponding feature enabled.
Fix #22234.
----
Also, the framework this add (passing along a reference to the features in the expansion context) is a necessary precursor for landing a properly feature-gated desugaring-based overloaded-`box` and placement-`in` (#22181).
----
This is fixing a bug, but since there might be code out there that is unknowingly taking advantage of that bug, I feel obligated to mark this as a:
[breaking-change]
|
|
mostly improved, to my eye.
Nonetheless, as this commit demonstrates, the previous commits was a [breaking-change].
In practice, breakage is focused on functions of this form:
```rust
fn foo(..., object: Box<FnMut()>)
````
where `FnMut()` could be any trait object type. The older scheme defaulted objects in argument
position so that they were bounded by a fresh lifetime:
```rust
fn foo<'a>(..., object: Box<FnMut()+'a>)
```
This meant that the object could contain borrowed data. The newer
scheme defaults to a lifetime bound of `'static`:
```rust
fn foo(..., object: Box<FnMut()+'static>)
```
This means that the object cannot contain borrowed data. In some cases, the best fix
is to stop using `Box`:
```rust
fn foo(..., object: &mut FnMut())
```
but another option is to write an explicit annotation for the `'a`
lifetime that used to be implicit. Both fixes are demonstrated in
this commit.
|
|
|
|
Fixes #22070.
Fixes #19372.
|
|
Fixes #16803.
Fixes #14342.
Fixes half of #21827 -- slice syntax is still broken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/librustc/lint/builtin.rs
src/librustc/lint/context.rs
|
|
Conflicts:
mk/tests.mk
src/liballoc/arc.rs
src/liballoc/boxed.rs
src/liballoc/rc.rs
src/libcollections/bit.rs
src/libcollections/btree/map.rs
src/libcollections/btree/set.rs
src/libcollections/dlist.rs
src/libcollections/ring_buf.rs
src/libcollections/slice.rs
src/libcollections/str.rs
src/libcollections/string.rs
src/libcollections/vec.rs
src/libcollections/vec_map.rs
src/libcore/any.rs
src/libcore/array.rs
src/libcore/borrow.rs
src/libcore/error.rs
src/libcore/fmt/mod.rs
src/libcore/iter.rs
src/libcore/marker.rs
src/libcore/ops.rs
src/libcore/result.rs
src/libcore/slice.rs
src/libcore/str/mod.rs
src/libregex/lib.rs
src/libregex/re.rs
src/librustc/lint/builtin.rs
src/libstd/collections/hash/map.rs
src/libstd/collections/hash/set.rs
src/libstd/sync/mpsc/mod.rs
src/libstd/sync/mutex.rs
src/libstd/sync/poison.rs
src/libstd/sync/rwlock.rs
src/libsyntax/feature_gate.rs
src/libsyntax/test.rs
|
|
I'm beginning to suspect it's impossible to avoid accidentally writing
`#[deriving]` at least once in every program, and it results in
non-intuitive error messages: "Foo doesn't have any method in scope
`clone`" despite there being a `#[deriv...(Clone)]` attribute!
Also, lots of documentation around the internet uses `#[deriving]` so
providing this guidance is very helpful (lots of people ask in #rust
about this error).
Fixes #21166.
|
|
stable/unstable
Conflicts:
src/libcore/atomic.rs
src/libcore/finally.rs
src/test/auxiliary/inherited_stability.rs
src/test/auxiliary/lint_stability.rs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allows modifiers to be used on methods, associated types, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit performs a pass over the `std::macros` module, applying stability
attributes where necessary. In particular, this audits macros for patterns such
as:
* Standard use of forward-to-format-args via `$($arg:tt)*` (or `+`)
* Prevent macro-defined identifiers from leaking into expression arguments as
hygiene is not perfectly implemented.
* Wherever possible, `$crate` is used now.
Specifically, the following actions were taken:
* The `std::macros` module itself is no longer public.
* The `panic!` macro is stable
* The `assert!` macro is stable
* The `assert_eq!` macro is stable
* The `debug_assert!` macro is stable
* The `debug_assert_eq!` macro is stable
* The `unreachable!` macro is stable after removing the extra forms to bring the
definition in line with the `unimplemented!` macro.
* The `try!` macro is stable
* The `vec!` macro is stable
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of copy-pasting the whole macro_rules! item from the original .rs file,
we serialize a separate name, attributes list, and body, the latter as
pretty-printed TTs. The compilation of macro_rules! macros is decoupled
somewhat from the expansion of macros in item position.
This filters out comments, and facilitates selective imports.
|
|
The implementation of LetSyntaxTT was specialized to macro_rules! in various
ways. This gets rid of the false generality and simplifies the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[breaking-change]
`deriving is still accepted, but gives a deprecation warning
|
|
|
|
According to [RFC 344][], methods that return `&[u8]` should have names
ending in `bytes`. Though `include_bin!` is a macro not a method, it
seems reasonable to follow the convention anyway.
We keep the old name around for now, but trigger a deprecation warning
when it is used.
[RFC 344]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0344-conventions-galore.md
[breaking-change]
|
|
Conflicts:
src/libcore/str.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/closure.rs
src/librustc_typeck/collect.rs
src/libstd/path/posix.rs
src/libstd/path/windows.rs
|
|
cannot use an `as` expression to coerce, so I used a one-off function
instead (this is a no-op in stage0, but in stage1+ it triggers
coercion from the fn pointer to the fn item type).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
