| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Remove the `NonMatchesExplode` variant now that no deriving impl uses it.
Removed `EnumNonMatching` entirely.
Remove now irrelevant `on_matching` field and `HandleNonMatchingEnums` type.
Removed unused `EnumNonMatchFunc` type def.
Drive-by: revise `EnumNonMatchCollapsedFunc` doc.
Made all calls to `expand_enum_method_body` go directly to
`build_enum_match_tuple`.
Alpha-rename `enum_nonmatch_g` back to `enum_nonmatch_f` to reduce overall diff noise.
Inline sole call of `some_ordering_const`.
Inline sole call of `ordering_const`.
Removed a bunch of code that became dead after the above changes.
|
|
In the above formulas, `n` is the number of variants, and `k` is the
number of self-args fed into deriving. In the particular case of
interest (namely `PartialOrd` and `Ord`), `k` is always 2, so we are
basically comparing `O(n)` versus `O(n^2)`.
Also, the stage is set for having *all* enum deriving codes go through
`build_enum_match_tuple` and getting rid of `build_enum_match`.
Also, seriously attempted to clean up the code itself. Added a bunch
of comments attempting to document what I learned as I worked through
the original code and adapted it to this new strategy.
|
|
In particular, I want authors of deriving modes to understand what
they are opting into (namely quadratic code size or worse) when they
select NonMatchesExplode.
|
|
|
|
* The select/plural methods from format strings are removed
* The # character no longer needs to be escaped
* The \-based escapes have been removed
* '{{' is now an escape for '{'
* '}}' is now an escape for '}'
Closes #14810
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
`quote_expr!` now injects two more (priv) `use` globs.
This may cause extra unused_imports warning.
|
|
[breaking-change]
|
|
Currently, the format_args!() macro takes as its first argument an expression
which is the callee of an ExprCall. This means that if format_args!() is used
with calling a method a closure must be used. Consider this code, however:
format_args!(|args| { foo.writer.write_fmt(args) }, "{}", foo.field)
The closure borrows the entire `foo` structure, disallowing the later borrow of
`foo.field`. To preserve the semantics of the `write!` macro, it is also
impossible to borrow specifically the `writer` field of the `foo` structure
because it must be borrowed mutably, but the `foo` structure is not guaranteed
to be mutable itself.
This new macro is invoked like:
format_args_method!(foo.writer, write_fmt, "{}", foo.field)
This macro will generate an ExprMethodCall which allows the borrow checker to
understand that `writer` and `field` should be borrowed separately.
This macro is not strictly necessary, with DST or possibly UFCS other
workarounds could be used. For now, though, it looks like this is required to
implement the `write!` macro.
|
|
|
|
Closes #13698
|
|
This fixes various issues throughout the standard distribution and tests.
|
|
Closes #13698
|
|
port all code over to use it.
|
|
It's now in the prelude.
|
|
Closes #12771
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously, format!("{a}{b}", a=foo(), b=bar()) has foo() and bar() run in a
nondeterminisc order. This is clearly a non-desirable property, so this commit
uses iteration over a list instead of iteration over a hash map to provide
deterministic code generation of these format arguments.
|
|
These two containers are indeed collections, so their place is in
libcollections, not in libstd. There will always be a hash map as part of the
standard distribution of Rust, but by moving it out of the standard library it
makes libstd that much more portable to more platforms and environments.
This conveniently also removes the stuttering of 'std::hashmap::HashMap',
although 'collections::HashMap' is only one character shorter.
|
|
|
|
Preparatory work for removing unique vectors from the language, which is
itself preparatory work for dynamically sized types.
|
|
The old method of building up a list of items and threading it through
all of the decorators was unwieldy and not really scalable as
non-deriving ItemDecorators become possible. The API is now that the
decorator gets an immutable reference to the item it's attached to, and
a callback that it can pass new items to. If we want to add syntax
extensions that can modify the item they're attached to, we can add that
later, but I think it'll have to be separate from ItemDecorator to avoid
strange ordering issues.
@huonw
|
|
|
|
The old method of building up a list of items and threading it through
all of the decorators was unwieldy and not really scalable as
non-deriving ItemDecorators become possible. The API is now that the
decorator gets an immutable reference to the item it's attached to, and
a callback that it can pass new items to. If we want to add syntax
extensions that can modify the item they're attached to, we can add that
later, but I think it'll have to be separate from ItemDecorator to avoid
strange ordering issues.
|
|
|
|
|
