| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/libcore/cell.rs
src/librustc_driver/test.rs
src/libstd/old_io/net/tcp.rs
src/libstd/old_io/process.rs
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/librustc/lint/builtin.rs
src/librustc/lint/context.rs
|
|
This ends up propagating all the way out to the output of dep-info which then
makes Cargo think that files are not existent (it thinks the files have quotes
in their name) when they in fact do.
|
|
Fixes #21497
I don't know if this can be tested with built-in tests.
|
|
I'm beginning to suspect it's impossible to avoid accidentally writing
`#[deriving]` at least once in every program, and it results in
non-intuitive error messages: "Foo doesn't have any method in scope
`clone`" despite there being a `#[deriv...(Clone)]` attribute!
Also, lots of documentation around the internet uses `#[deriving]` so
providing this guidance is very helpful (lots of people ask in #rust
about this error).
|
|
Conflicts:
src/libcore/cmp.rs
src/libcore/fmt/mod.rs
src/libcore/iter.rs
src/libcore/marker.rs
src/libcore/num/f32.rs
src/libcore/num/f64.rs
src/libcore/result.rs
src/libcore/str/mod.rs
src/librustc/lint/builtin.rs
src/librustc/lint/context.rs
src/libstd/sync/mpsc/mod.rs
src/libstd/sync/poison.rs
|
|
Conflicts:
mk/tests.mk
src/liballoc/arc.rs
src/liballoc/boxed.rs
src/liballoc/rc.rs
src/libcollections/bit.rs
src/libcollections/btree/map.rs
src/libcollections/btree/set.rs
src/libcollections/dlist.rs
src/libcollections/ring_buf.rs
src/libcollections/slice.rs
src/libcollections/str.rs
src/libcollections/string.rs
src/libcollections/vec.rs
src/libcollections/vec_map.rs
src/libcore/any.rs
src/libcore/array.rs
src/libcore/borrow.rs
src/libcore/error.rs
src/libcore/fmt/mod.rs
src/libcore/iter.rs
src/libcore/marker.rs
src/libcore/ops.rs
src/libcore/result.rs
src/libcore/slice.rs
src/libcore/str/mod.rs
src/libregex/lib.rs
src/libregex/re.rs
src/librustc/lint/builtin.rs
src/libstd/collections/hash/map.rs
src/libstd/collections/hash/set.rs
src/libstd/sync/mpsc/mod.rs
src/libstd/sync/mutex.rs
src/libstd/sync/poison.rs
src/libstd/sync/rwlock.rs
src/libsyntax/feature_gate.rs
src/libsyntax/test.rs
|
|
This ends up propagating all the way out to the output of dep-info which then
makes Cargo think that files are not existent (it thinks the files have quotes
in their name) when they in fact do.
|
|
|
|
I'm beginning to suspect it's impossible to avoid accidentally writing
`#[deriving]` at least once in every program, and it results in
non-intuitive error messages: "Foo doesn't have any method in scope
`clone`" despite there being a `#[deriv...(Clone)]` attribute!
Also, lots of documentation around the internet uses `#[deriving]` so
providing this guidance is very helpful (lots of people ask in #rust
about this error).
Fixes #21166.
|
|
|
|
stable/unstable
Conflicts:
src/libcore/atomic.rs
src/libcore/finally.rs
src/test/auxiliary/inherited_stability.rs
src/test/auxiliary/lint_stability.rs
|
|
Also, print help on valid fragment specifiers.
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/librustc/diagnostics.rs
src/librustdoc/clean/mod.rs
src/librustdoc/html/format.rs
src/libsyntax/parse/parser.rs
|
|
Conflicts:
src/liballoc/boxed.rs
src/librustc/middle/traits/error_reporting.rs
src/libstd/sync/mpsc/mod.rs
|
|
This is little clean code of this PR: #21366. I patched the same thing as aochagavia but too slowly obviously. This is a merge of our two codes, more "rust-like".
|
|
Collaboration with @rylev!
I didn't change `int` in the [quasi-quoter](https://github.com/pshc/rust/blob/99ae1a30f3ca28c0f7e431620560d30e44627124/src/libsyntax/ext/quote.rs#L328), because I'm not sure if there will be adverse effects.
Addresses #21095.
|
|
|
|
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 565][rfc] which is a stabilization of
the `std::fmt` module and the implementations of various formatting traits.
Specifically, the following changes were performed:
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0565-show-string-guidelines.md
* The `Show` trait is now deprecated, it was renamed to `Debug`
* The `String` trait is now deprecated, it was renamed to `Display`
* Many `Debug` and `Display` implementations were audited in accordance with the
RFC and audited implementations now have the `#[stable]` attribute
* Integers and floats no longer print a suffix
* Smart pointers no longer print details that they are a smart pointer
* Paths with `Debug` are now quoted and escape characters
* The `unwrap` methods on `Result` now require `Display` instead of `Debug`
* The `Error` trait no longer has a `detail` method and now requires that
`Display` must be implemented. With the loss of `String`, this has moved into
libcore.
* `impl<E: Error> FromError<E> for Box<Error>` now exists
* `derive(Show)` has been renamed to `derive(Debug)`. This is not currently
warned about due to warnings being emitted on stage1+
While backwards compatibility is attempted to be maintained with a blanket
implementation of `Display` for the old `String` trait (and the same for
`Show`/`Debug`) this is still a breaking change due to primitives no longer
implementing `String` as well as modifications such as `unwrap` and the `Error`
trait. Most code is fairly straightforward to update with a rename or tweaks of
method calls.
[breaking-change]
Closes #21436
|
|
There are a large number of places that incorrectly refer
to deriving in comments, instead of derives.
If someone could look at src/etc/generate-deriving-span-tests.py,
I'm not sure how those tests were passing before/if they were.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes #21350
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are a large number of places that incorrectly refer
to deriving in comments, instead of derives.
Fixes #20984
|
|
This fixes #16530 by hashing nullary structs [the same way as the empty tuple] (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/libcore/hash/mod.rs#L185). Other approaches are possible, but this was the simplest.
|
|
Currently, we build a closure that does nothing but pass its argument
through to another function, this is rather wasteful and creates lots of
unnecessary closures.
|
|
expansion now uses `::std::hash::Hash::hash(&*__self_0_0, __arg_0)` instead of
`(*__self_0_0).hash(__arg_0)`
closes #21160
r? @alexcrichton
|
|
Fixes #21045
|
|
Allows modifiers to be used on methods, associated types, etc.
r? @sfackler
|
|
Currently, we build a closure that does nothing but pass its argument
through to another function, this is rather wasteful and creates lots of
unnecessary closures.
|
|
fixes #16530
|
|
|
|
expansion now uses `::std::hash::Hash::hash(&*__self_0_0, __arg_0)` instead of
`(*__self_0_0).hash(__arg_0)`
closes #21160
|
|
Allows modifiers to be used on methods, associated types, etc.
|
|
Fixes #21045
|
|
Syntax and a few fixed bugs etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/libcollections/vec.rs
src/libcore/fmt/mod.rs
src/librustc/lint/builtin.rs
src/librustc/session/config.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/base.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/context.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/type_.rs
src/librustc_typeck/check/_match.rs
src/librustdoc/html/format.rs
src/libsyntax/std_inject.rs
src/libsyntax/util/interner.rs
src/test/compile-fail/mut-pattern-mismatched.rs
|